English education made "the most basic fault"
Li Jiashi / Jinan International University professor professor in Chinese, two verbs, of course, can appear in the sentence at the same time, "I like the book", "I don't like music" These are correct sentences. However, in English, two verbs are used together, but they have made a big taboo.
Therefore, the officials of the Ministry of Education have written "Each Party Is Reasonably Access To Research", which caused an uproar, because "IS" and "Provide" are verbs. This kind of mistake, I call "fatal mistakes", my student has made this mistake, I will write Fe, meaning that you made a Fatal Error.
Although the media has speculated on this matter, I can't think of it, because I believe that most students will make this mistake. I taught in the university for many years. I also participated in the graduate paper seminar every week. I know the English level of my classmates, and I said that I have not listened, they are a group of people who will make basic literary laws.
I don't like anyone here, we should be deeply reviewed, why students will make this most basic Chinese law mistake? Our students, I have read three years in the country, in high school, I have read three years in English; enter high school, to take English, enter the university, and to test English, but why not basic literary law?
The truth is very simple, our English education does not pay attention to basic literacy. Most teachers pay attention to the difficulty of cultural law, virtual tone, articles, etc. are all the most love of teachers, as for the most basic part in the literary law, never appear in the examination questions.
Go until now, college students often forget to add S behind the verbs, forgetting sometimes to use HAS, but can't use Have. They will also add TO behind the MUST or CAN, and forget to use the past words when using the current completion, so that two verbs are used together, they are home to the house.
Although these students are so confused, as long as they drink them as a head, they will not make the basic literary law mistakes. My student should write a short middle Turkish, and there is a computer system that is modified in English. Every time I change my composition, I will definitely spend the name of the students. I explain that he is wrong there. Of course, Warning him will not make a reappearance, all of which are recorded by the computer, and after the post can see, I can hear that I will warn him. One year, it is probably not to make this basic and fatal mistake.
I have to change one hundred articles about a hundred weekends. Every error is included in the file. I will explain these errors to my classmates when I start classes. Change one hundred English compositions every week, not a pleasant thing. Before each change in the text, you must eat blood pressure, to prevent the absurd articles, will be a life. But at the end of the semester, I saw that the chances of the students made mistakes were getting smaller and smaller, and the blood pressure drugs were probably no longer needed.
I have to ask a serious warning to society. The English exam in the country did not pay attention to the most basic part of English. Even if the students passed the exam, they still can't ask him to write an English article. I have evidence that I have a student write English essays, but he has taken a high score in an important exam held in the country.
English education must be pragmatic, that is, it should be a common goal: students write English sentences do not commit fundamental law errors. Sometimes, students' lessons seem to be great, but the basic skills of students can't do. Teachers always have no interest in the work of students, just want to teach those things that are very learning, and the test is also the things that have learned. Students seem to have learned a very deep understanding. In fact, once he wrote a writing article, he will connect two verbs very strongly. Once, a classmate used three verbs, he said that he only knows that you can't use two verbs, so he uses three verbs, which is probably correct.
If our English exam is still unparalleled, and if the students will not pay for the mistakes of the basic Chinese law, I only advise the government officials to write any English documents, so as not to be blind.
Students can do not make basic literacy errors, if they don't make a choice questions from small, but the real guns will write English sentences and English composition. Once they make mistakes, the teacher will tell him. Government officials should not be afraid to write a strange English article.
