Change is a power of life! Chang is a power of life! How to follow the organization while running in your own position
In order to suppress the individuality of the employee, the company has made a decimal to use all the tools: formulate standards, rules and regulations, organizational systems and behavioral norms. However, the result has a great negative impact on the innovation of the product, process and organizational structure. For example: "Budget is supra!" "Employees are unreliable!" "We must control performance at any time, and continue to pressure." "If other companies don't do this, then have the reason, we don't have to take this risk. "" The Board can think of these. "" "Go tell them, this is what they should know." Many companies believe that they can successfully control employees. I don't fully believe in the power of "control" in management. But there is no exception, most companies' board and management of the management are convinced of the theory. They put the focus in mistakes, weak links and cost, and there is also extremely serious bureaucratic. ("Is this a final budget?", "Can the chart do?") Most companies are still overproc in despair. No wonder MBA is known as the Master of Industry and Commerce. In the management philosophy of the personnel department, it is just a tool to make money. They are installed in the box and are monitored every day. Successful stories and behaviors of some dictators are hung in their mouths, and to prevent the company's uniqueness to prevent the company's dual moral standards from being challenged. In short, there are people to question the health of the enterprise. "I" or "we"? The relationship between individuals and groups is not necessarily full of gunpowder, but how do companies have contributed to the business? How can we reach "I" and "We", "Keep" and "Reform", "Independent" and "Cooperation", "Self-responsible" and "Super Command"? On the one hand, we must fully pay full attention to the rules of the economic regulations, and the other hand must be quickly, flexiblely letting new products; on the one hand, we must pay attention to the quality of the product, the cost reduction and efficiency of the cost, on the other hand in confrontation At the time of international competition, it must pay attention to innovation; on the one hand, we must adapt to the organization, on the other hand, we urgently need an individual to create excellent results. Briefly, we need innovation and adaptation, entrepreneurship and ISO9000, outstanding performance and obedience. Many companies are trapped in the internal contradictory mud, which cannot be self-extricted. Employees are treated as a mouse in the laboratory, often accepting contradictory orders. Therefore, organizations must face unprecedented challenges and conflicts, adjustments or re-construct a new set of structures. Can companies only pay attention to technological innovation, and I ignore the transformation of self-cognition in internal employees in the enterprise? Don't we take every individual seriously? In the face of new employees, don't we take more elaborate personnel management systems? Don't we distinguish between different qualities between employees? Is the role of organizations to standardize individuals? Not just a trade union in the handicraft industry, even if the high level of modern enterprises will be impossible to face this deformity organization. The more desire to personally, the less attention will pay attention to the particularity of the individual. People's mind is full of "adaptation, adaptation, re-adaptation" of the averageist era, in fact, this is also a residency in the era of centralized centralism.
The most effective way to solve the most crisis is often the way people deliberately escape or resistance.
Creativity requires open space, freedom work and goals, moderate pressure, and diversity
Let's make a guessing game. Please tell the joint characteristics of the following famous characters: Konradadenauer, Franzbeckenbauer, Henryford, San Zanni, Bill Gore ( Billgore, Maxgrundig, Johnf.kennedy, Martinlutherking, Lenin, Moses, Johnd.Rockefeller, Saver Chergaretthatcher, Lechwalesa. A very interesting combination, isn't it? If you don't look at their historical background, personal traits, and the industry you are doing, you also abandon your personal commencement, what did you see? What is the reason to make them a great person? Very simple, only one reason: someone is willing to follow them, some people are willing to hear them. Because people believe that they can bring a better life for themselves, and people let them become leaders. If you know the essence of leaders, you should ask: "How should I support employees?" Or, "How can I help?" Success under the ministry? "" How can I win the trust under the part? "The success of the leadership is indirect, and it is built on the success of the employee. In other words, they can only help others succeed, this is the difference between "authority" and "dictatorship".
Let us see those young entrepreneurs who are insufficient and even experienced, they are successful because they don't have much experience, and experiences often make people's gaze narrow. "Habits" is the most hard stone in the world. Once we are used to a successful route, we are hard to try other ways. Unless you succeed, it is "no principle", or "we always keep it different from others."
