Current guest
Professor of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Telecom Expert 阚 阚 力 特约 主
: The Director of the Beijing Morning News Economy, Telecom Reporter Wang Zhengpeng On the afternoon of October 20th, the professor of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications experts, the well-known domestic telecom experts 阚 阚 作 作 新 新 浪 问题 问题 问题 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交 交One of the experts online series
. The chat record is as follows:
Discuss 3G needs to be cleared three relations Wang Zhengpeng: everyone in Sina is good! Today, we are honored to go to the famous Telecom experts in China to the Sina chat room, and you talk about a topic of hot this year, 3G problem. We first invited the teacher to speech to netizens before talking.
阚 阚 力: I can't say a speech, everyone's good afternoon, today I am very happy to go to Sina Guest chat room and everyone exchanges about 3G issues.
Wang Zhengpeng: Wang Xudong has a speech, 3G does not have time, 3G test is still going, do you think is his speech? Is there any strategic value?
阚 阚 力: I think Wang Xudong's speech, very summarized, and very accurately describe our country's industrial policy, a timetable without 3G in our country. The second, we are tested, and our country should see the maturity of 3G technology and the maturity of the market, I think this is the key to the problem, and should be a policy of 3G on our country.
Wang Zhengpeng: I heard that you have new insights in the country's 3G industry in 2004, you can introduce your netizens.
阚 阚 力: I think 3G is very hot, and what problems are grown together with 3G. 3G This question is first because there are three relationships issues: the first, commonly known as the relationship between 3G business and 3G systems. The second is to locate the government and enterprises on the 3G issue. The third is that our country does not engage in 3G and our country should not increase the relationship between the two issues of mobile licenses.
Wang Zhengpeng: These three relationships, we can feel that you think is now for 3G industries, in China, whether operators are operators or equipment, have some mistakes. However, we can also feel that before the Beijing International Communications Exhibition, each operator and equipment is ready. Everyone feels that I have to send 3G licenses next year. It seems that this has become the industry's consensus. How do you think this? problem?
阚 阚 力: Or because of the three relationships just said, first, the first, unlimited broadband business and 3G technology system relationship, wireless broadband business, in fact, our country has already opened, not only opened, but also Open all, like Unicom's CDMA, there is also mobile GPRS, actually open the business that 3G can open. Like a wireless Internet, but also a broadband high-speed, even a video of 12 channels like Unicom's CDMA1x, you can watch TV. In this case, I am afraid that the business that can be provided by the 3G system has long been provided in our country, that is, 3G business, or wireless broadband business does not mean to be WCDMA, CDMA2000, or TDSCDMA, these three technical standards, Last system, and to do large-scale investment, this problem is critical, I think it is necessary to draft the second relationship problem, which is the positioning problem between the government and the enterprise.
Like Unicom, mobile is also available, they have provided a large number of high-end wireless broadband services, including Internet, including video, should be applied by these enterprises in their own business development, he will apply. For example, Unicom, now spend 180 billion throughout the national upgrade, but because the business is too hot, the network capacity is not enough, it is necessary to adopt a new technical means, and need new frequencies, this time should be connected by mobile operators or Mobile to apply to the Ministry of Information Industry, I need a new frequency band, I need a new technical system and then consider by the government. Of course, when their mobile operators have filed an application, of course, he must make the necessity, feasibility, and even plan arguments, and then the government will review these, and even find experts to comment, solicit the opinions of society, and then the government can decide Is it batch to his new frequency band. Enterprises and governments, can't get on a certain technology, it should be a company to take the initiative, not the government, whether you want, I am from the government to decide whether you come to a system, this government and enterprise, put the relationship Inverted, this I think is an fundamental confusion of the two relationships wrong positioning. Wang Zhengpeng: According to your inference, from macro, 3G application pushes technology, and the company is pushing to the government.
阚 阚 力: Yes, it should be like this, even more accurate points, is like Wang Xudong's minister, first of all, to see social needs, social needs push the company, then apply to the government, pushing the government. It seems like public opinion and media, put pressure on the government, why not China is not 3G, is because the government does not issue a license, this I want to have a fundamental relationship. China has developed 3G can't make big leap forward
Wang Zhengpeng: The government has sent a year to a year, and it seems to be bubble earlier in the past few years. In this case, I will do a small test to you, between the equipment, operators, and the government, you have a priority, who is most eager to distribute 3G licenses?
阚 阚 力: Now, from me, because of a few aspects, I am afraid now the most active or equipment manufacturer, especially those of these transnational companies. I told in a forum in March this year. Please go back to your country. It is North American company. You go back to North America. It is European company. You go back to Europe, you go to the 3G network. As long as you have successfully succeed in your Europe or North America, it is really hot, and operators can have corresponding economic benefits. At this time, you don't need you to mobilize China, and China will definitely.
More than 20 years ago, like China's decision-making exchange, this simply did not have Western manufacturers to push China, and then China is still very determined to come to the program. Therefore, this practice test truth, does not require your multinational manufacturers to try to work hard to affect China's industrial policy.
Wang Zhengpeng: The previous time, just in the United States, it is often concerned about the 3G situation of Sweden and Germany. What is their 3G construction?
阚 阚 力: In general, it is still beginning. In general, the high-end business universal demand universal needs is not enough, so now, the world has a consensus, the main business of the 3G system is still a voice, its main income is still from the voice.
Then there is a problem, in China's voice network system, whether GSM is good, or CDMA, this capacity is very abundant, especially Unicom's CDMA, large capacity, still missing And the marks often encounter a lot of difficulties. So in this case, the capacity of our national voice network is more than enough. In this case, I think that mobile operators are good, or China Unicom is also good, they think about it. Don't go to 3G, but according to what I have heard, they are in the short term, or now, as soon as possible I am afraid that I am actuated in 3G is not high, because they don't understand the 3G necessity through their own business. So no matter how mobile GPRS is also, or CDMA on Unicom is actually provided with high-end business and applications of wireless broadband, this itself is also cultivating the market, this market is cultivated to need a process.
Wang Zhengpeng: China Mobile has created a dream network in Asia in the past two or three years. China's video, telecommunications business, these two companies look, now in the use of operators, it is still very interested in mobile operators in their so-called 3G licenses.
阚 阚 力: At least there is at least a strong, urgent society, so mobile operators naturally consider a large amount of investment, what kind of economic benefits will be brought to the future, or lose money. So I think they have much more realistic.
Wang Zhengpeng: Now we have heard a general inference is that in 2005, we sent a 3G license. In the 5.17, in 2006, in 2008, it will inevitably become a logic. How do you think about this problem?
阚 阚 力: This I think is within half a year, or China will have a 3G license within one year. This is probably at least four or five years. Some people say that because China has to open the Olympics in 2008, it must be 3G. I am afraid this is too expensive. If there is no social demand, it is simply to show the technical level, then I believe it is better to come to Shenzhou 6! That is to be proud in our country's national national, only three countries in the world, and now there is a manned space technology level and ability, China is one of the three. I think we can do this again, and may drive more other industries in our country.
Wang Zhengpeng: I heard, you think that if such a logic, 3G technology will generate a big leap forward. But recently, the opposite, many foreign telecommunications technicians or other experts, they believe that if China does not send 3G licenses in 2005, I missed the god of 3G development. Many media friends don't understand this problem. How do you think about this problem?
阚 阚 力: I think this problem is this, it is difficult to say that now 3G is a good opportunity, because what? This opportunity is not a good opportunity, and the key should still look at the market demand. I remembered the mid-1980s, ISDN was still not very popular in the world's telecommunications industry, and everyone described it as an information highway. But in fact, the biggest problem at that time is what is ISDN to do in the 1980s? No one can solve it. After ten years, the Internet is popular, it is a broadest application for the data business, but ISDN has been behind ten years, because these technologies like ADSL, Wireless LANs, etc. So this time, there are some companies in the world, and it is also a hugegar to engage in ISDN, but I am afraid that I have lost a loss, and ISDN has not played role. Wang Zhengpeng: Technical fanatics is easy to cause a high technology. I don't agree with the fixed-line operator to mobile license.
Netizen: China is now in addition to the four major operators, and if there are 3G licenses, will it cause 3G leap forward?
阚 阚 力: This is the three concerns I have said. Our country should engage in 3G. This is a technology. Do you want to increase the number of mobile communication operators, or do not increase mobile license, this is two yards, don't Mix this technical issue and a license issue. Our country now mobile operators should say two, one is China Mobile, and the other is China Unicom, there are three networks, two companies.
Another problem, China Telecom and Netcom Group, they do not do mobile communications business, this involves an industrial pattern, an industrial policy and competition pattern, this should not be pulled with 3G, even if China has developed 3G this technology It is also not necessary to give a license to the mobile communication.
On the same aspect, if the government decides to increase the mobile communication license, it must be 3G. Very simple, like China Unicom, it is now CDMA and GSM two networks. Everyone describes the left hand to hit the right hand, it is indeed a bit of contradictory contradiction, these two networks, these two strengths are basically the same, all SMS is the main.
Then, in order to strengthen the competition of our country's mobile communications, further promote the decline of mobile communication tariffs, the most expensive, and the cheapest approach, and do not need national investment, what should I do? It is to separate China Unicom's two networks. In this case, China only has three mobile operators, one is now China Mobile; the other is the original Unicom; the third is Unicom CDMA, which forms three consecutive, competes with each other, It actually increases a license.
Also as China Telecom, or Netcom Group, if they really want to move the license, this is very simple, they said that a few years ago, I took the move from our China, and I just said that I was wrong. The State Council is required, or the State-owned Assets Supervision Commission re-comes back, there is no need to pull it with 3G, and it is not necessary to say that it will go to the investment of 3G to 3G. This is actually a way to hurt money, and ask it again. Come back, isn't it finished?
Wang Zhengpeng: In the distribution of mobile operators, if you need three, China Telecom and China Netcom will receive a mobile license. It is not necessarily a 3G license. It is a three competition. How to design is reasonable?
阚 阚 力: I felt that a few years ago, the mobile communication business splits it from China Telecom. It was 99 years. In 2000, I think that the decision of the time is correct, because this promotes the fair competition of our country's mobile communications industry. So subsequently followed by 99 years, 2000, until the rapid development of the national mobile communication business in 2001, because China Mobile can better compete better, because China Mobile does not continue to rely on China Telecom is relatively equit of a monopoly advantage of fixed network, and competition is relatively fair, and this fair has promoted development. So I found it fundamentally, I don't agree with China's fixed-network operator to increase the mobile communication license. What do you do will do something? For example, now broadband Internet access, this is also a big business growth point of fixed-network operators. This thing is to do well, which is better to promote our country's information society, both social benefits, and economic benefits.
Netizen: If we go to the 3G network, will not hurt the current mobile communications industry that China is booming, will there be a harmful role?
阚 阚 力: To said, I personally think that I am sure that it is definitely, because what? To engage in 3G must need a lot of billions of investments, but economic benefits from the whole world, it is very poor, and just a few aspects, now to 3G business, 3G is the least active It is a consumer. Wang Zhengpeng: The end is inverted.
阚 阚 力: This consumers are not active, then operators go to 3G to go to 3G, I am afraid that the economic benefits are very poor, the economic benefits are very poor, I am afraid that the wool is still in the sheep, and the mobile operator will be from other 2G networks. And business, like voice, Netcom these areas, because these are listed companies, so naturally, consumers will also be unfavorable.
So I think it is very disadvantageous from mobile operators to go to 3G now, I am very disadvantageous, I am really unfavorable. Wang Zhengpeng: When we are talking about it today, the equipment project of Beijing International Exhibition Center is busy, and everyone says that if 3G is saying from small aspects, can you develop 3G opportunities in China, let Huawei, ZTE, Datang so excellent Company, can have a company with Ericsson, Siemens, becomes a telecommunications giant, is there such a possibility?
阚 阚 力: I think first of our country is a member of the WTO. Our country's technical policy, industrial policy cannot engage in protectionism, if China has 3G, only let China's manufacturers to sell equipment, do not let foreign people to sell Equipment, this is definitely unreasonable. And even such a protectionist policy, it is also not conducive to the healthy development of these manufacturers, which becomes the flowers in the greenhouse.
Because our country is a member of the WTO, what is Huawei, ZTE has quickly moved to the international market, as a whole world as their market, I think this is a right path, light relying on our national government to engage in protectionism, protect Their development is sure, I think it is unfavorable to them. What's more, 3G this system itself is now, I am afraid that the economic benefits are very bad, and it is difficult to grow rapidly. It is difficult to develop such a technology in China, so I am afraid this is not a good way.
Wang Zhengpeng: You said that you should put them in the wolves, like Huawei, ZTE, so that they are now grabbing, layout their business around the world, which should be a hope of revitalizing the national industry. However, Datang is a special company. In the past few years, he has always taking care of TDSCDMA, but this exhibition is the eye-catching phenomenon, and the domestic legion is fully unveiled, its mobile phone, chip, telecommunications equipment come out, Datang It is very bitter, but the bright appears. You should look at Datang in the past two years and in the future.阚 阚 力: I think TDSCDMA technology is seen from two aspects. The first thing that we should say that all Chinese people are proud of this, because China has occupied a place in a major international telecommunications technology standard, which makes it a International standards, I think this represents a level of our national telecommunications manufacturing industry, especially the level of research and development capabilities, we have entered the finals of the World Cup, this shows that our technical level is improved.
On the other hand, as a large amount of capital and resources, people, labor, material, and financial resources to industrialize it, this I think that Datang must first look at the market, there is no market demand. I think that TDSCDMA is actually the same as those of the other two WCDMA and CDMA2000. If 3G is in the near future, the market demand is unclear, it is no exception to TDSCDMA, so I feel that Datang has went to go all right, even if it is broken. In pushing TDSCDMA's industrialization, I think there is room for explore in business strategies.
Wang Zhengpeng: If it is 3G market, China's TDSCDMA technology is likely to be China-centered, radiated around China's surrounding strong 3G standards?
阚 阚 力: This may have to read a lot of factors, because like our country, like the first generation of mobile communications, we have made a set of own standards, in fact, grafting the US frequency and European knowledge, which becomes China Unique thing. The results encountered many problems: the first, regardless of the equipment, the mobile phone is good, there is no scale economy, only China is only used. Second, there are many problems with this thing to international roaming. In this case, in the process of our second generation of mobile communications, our country is unswervingly adopted by GSM in the world standard, around 1995. Therefore, once this standard is adopted, one side has very good, the scale economy within the world, on the other hand, promotes global roaming, otherwise mobile brands called Global Pass? Because it is indeed roaming worldwide.
This scale economy is largely the construction of GSM systems in the world, so that China has a lot of cheapness. At the same time, because GSM is the most common standard in the world, it has also created a very favorable condition for our country, whether it is a mobile phone manufacturing or equipment manufacturing, and quickly enters the international market.
As a TDSCDMA, it can be used as a technical standard that our country must adopt, I remember that a few days ago had a clear statement, this is a technical standard developed by our country, but it does not necessarily mean mobile operations in our country. Commercial must use this technical standard, and there are many other factors. The four-in-one bits are not as simply four-in-one Wang Zhengpeng: I just talked about the provision of the market. There are many netizens asking questions, let's take a look at the questions of netizens.
Netizen: What difficulties encountered in non-symmetrical controls in the competition of state-owned telecom companies?
阚 阚 力: This question, I think it is not fair and unfair to enterprises. First of all, we must fair, the government's goal is to promote the interests of consumers and promote the development of social productivity. For this purpose, especially in the early stages of competition, there are almost no exceptions in the world, to take asymmetrical control on telecom operators. Some of the competitors who dominate the leadership, and encourage some competitors, these operators. Come to development. Our country is still more mild, such as South Korea, South Korea, which is very clear, you are in the market share, the first mobile operator is clear, prohibiting you to develop new users.
Wang Zhengpeng: It can't exceed 52%.
阚 阚 力: Western countries have similar policies, why? Because the government's goal is to promote productivity development, in order to protect consumers 'interests, the competition is fully effective, this is most effective to protect consumers' interests. So this asymmetrical control is completely essential for the government supervision in the competition.
Is there any difficulty? It should be said that in our country encounters some of our China's national conditions to determine the special difficulties, first of our telecom operators are state-owned enterprises. Therefore, it is also involved in the government in addition to telecommunications supervision like the Ministry of Information Industry; on the other hand, there are also state-owned enterprises, value-added issues, which is of course considering from other departments of the State-owned Assets Supervision Commission.
But in order to protect the value of state-owned enterprises, value added, often turning into a contradiction between promoting sufficient and effective competition. There are some messages in the first few months, saying that telecom operators 4 and 2, or 6 and 3, I have to evaluate this, I said that if I have a state-owned asset, value-added, simply 4 and 1, 6 and 1 calculated , Restore China Telecom's exclusive monopoly, this time, the stock will rise sharply, and there is no competition, and there is no business risk. When the official business can monopoly. So I think this is how state-owned enterprises go digest, how to gradually solve this problem is our national telecom system reform, and a major problem in the entire national economic system reform is gradually solved.
However, on this issue, it is often because of the realities of state-owned enterprises, so it will encounter some resistance and some difficulties in the government executive. CDMA dragged the hind leg of Unicom
Wang Zhengpeng: You just said that asymmetrical control, netizens have questions.
Netizen: In the mobile communications industry, it does have an asymmetrical control, Unicom and mobile prices are asymmetrical. Is this in the market need to introduce third-hold license companies to check?
阚 阚 力: I don't think it is a monopoly in our country's mobile market, but there is no doubt that it takes a lot of share in our market, and there is no doubt that is the lead operator. In this case, I think it first, China Unicom as a competitor, is it a good role in which it should be played, I think China Unicom has actually actually acts as a competitor since it on the CDMA network. It is weakened, because what? After CDMA, it caused a large-scale loss until today is also its GSM network to make money, to subsidize CDMA.
In this way, it becomes unable to go all out, like 99 years, in 2000 and China Mobile to compete, but need to keep it relatively high profit level, come to fill it in the CDMA's hole, this makes us The national mobile communications field is not sufficient. So from this point of view, the competition of mobile communication should be strengthened, I think a way is to divide the two networks into two different mobile operators. In this way, on the one hand, it has fully played the role of state-owned assets, and it is also beneficial to fully promote effective competition, so that consumers must be good. Netizen: China Unicom is strong, because China Mobile has the original advantage of China Telecom, and the death of death, only two oligarchy, is an asymmetrical competition, indeed need to introduce a third party. If you don't introduce a third party, can anyone fight against China?
阚 阚 力: That is to divide the two networks into two different operators, which has become three different operators, this competition is more fully. Moreover, some people may worry, saying that Unicom is divided into two, is it too weak, there is no way to compete, I don't have to worry about this problem. why? When I was 99 years, Unicom accounted for 4%, 5% of the market share, which is much smaller than today's regardless of CDMA, and the market share is much smaller, and the business income, also Due to much, and it doesn't have a decent network at that time. However, it fully played the role of competitors, especially after the establishment of the Ministry of Information Office in 1998, relatively, ended the previous referee and as athletes, so Unicom has reached a number of users in two years. .
Wang Zhengpeng: Three points in the world.
阚 阚 力: Yes, the result is from CDMA since 2001. Since the last three or four years, the basically its market share is no longer, because CDMA drags the hind legs of China Unicom's development, and it is not enough market competition. Not effective enough. So to increase the mobile operator, I think the best way, or Unicom is divided into two. As for other operators, I may need a large-scale investment in the country, which is unfavorable to the country. In this way, this will definitely increase significantly. Therefore, it is not a most favorable approach to consumers.
Wang Zhengpeng: If China Telecom and China Netcom get a license.
Netizen: If you get the mobile phone license, you will be able to put pressure on China Telecom and China Unicom with the power of China Telecom and China Net.
阚 阚 力: I agree, because the mobile communications split from China in the past few years, it is because this phenomenon is large, so this competition is unfair, so it is not possible to promote the rapid development of communications. So this netizen said, the front car is seen a few years ago, so I don't agree with the reasons why the fixed-network operator will send him a mobile license. Tietong Wei Mobile has not been able to take 3G license
Wang Zhengpeng: What about companies like Tietong and Wei News?
阚 阚 力: Such companies have market competition laws, they determine its fate, the market economy is the survival of the fittest, if Tiemong and Wei News are not able to find it very good positioning, especially make the wrong investment and market judgment, I am afraid it will be The market was eliminated. I feel like just said, the people of our country, to consumers, especially for the disadvantageous groups, such as the old people in the economic and non-developed regions of the country, and can help him develop. For the people, for consumers, for Chinese citizens, there is no advantageful fitting problem, you are old and weak, you must be eliminated, which is definitely unreasonable. But on the other hand, for the enterprise, the market economy is so ruthless, that is, it is necessary to look at the fittest, so I think that Tung Tong and Wei News are just a matter to find its proper positioning.
As for them to do mobile communication, I think they have neither this strength, and there is no need. At present, they still do their own business, on the other hand, come to gradually The development of technology and the development of the market are better for some new other entrance points. Netizen: If the WCDMA, CDMA2000, the WCDMA, CDMA2000, the telecommunications network is sent, give it to Wei News, other bundle, what do you see for this market design?
阚 阚 力: I feel that Western countries, especially Europe, have issued 3G licenses through large-scale auction in the past few years, and this itself proves that the effect is very bad. Especially in our country, these telecom operators, including mobile operators, actually are state-owned enterprises, even if they are listed, most of them are in the country, in the government. So in this case, this kind of auction or even collect money is not in China, so I can't talk about them at all.
And for different technical institutions, take different fees, this itself does not meet the basic principles of WTO. This is the practice of protectionism. The Chinese government has solemn promised to the whole world, so I don't do this, so I believe this The situation will not occur.
Netizen: 阚 Teacher, I am your faithful audience. I want to ask the six major telecom operators which hopes to get 3G licenses?
阚 阚 力: I think the key should be seen that he does not feel an urgent need for this business development. Talking in China Mobile and China Unicom, I see that they have not mentioned 3G's enthusiasm, because now they all provide wireless broadband business or 3G service, and there is no shortage of network capacity, existing The problem of insufficient system technology skills. So I see two, will not be a horse to apply for a 3G license first.
As for China Telecom and Netcom Group, they first issues, the government will allow it to operate the mobile communication business, this government has not contained, so even if he wants, it is not necessary to get.
As for Tielectric and Waitong, the two problems exist. One of him has no ability to do 3G, not to mention the market demand, and it will be very difficult to operate. In addition, even if he wants, the government will give him, because of the 3G license, there are two practices, a auction, just said that China is definitely not applicable. There is also a choice of beauty, seeing your own condition. I have a good time, or it is good, I am afraid that the conditions are not very very.
Wang Zhengpeng: There is also such a saying last period. If China Unicom gets such a license with Netcom, but there is not exactive, China Mobile and Tietong will become a full-capacity operator, so that the license may be very large, this is also a for more time. Rumors.阚 阚 力: I think the operator of this full-service license and full business business, this practice is not reasonable, I think it needs to be built in itself. Because our country has just split mobile communications a few years ago, it has indeed a good effect, and the truth is true. Now I have urgent to negate the reform results of the previous paragraph, and some of the correct policies and policies proved, and then go to the full license, I think this problem is worth discussing.
Wang Zhengpeng: This deny is a reverse.阚 阚 力: Yes.
Netizen: If China has made 3G licenses in 2007, everyone began to do this network. According to preliminary estimates, the initial investment probably said that RMB is about 100 billion?
阚 阚 力: When the meeting in March this year, according to its estimate of the State Council Development Research Center, it is a need of 500 billion investment. Or do you say, almost about 5% of the total GDP in our country, or is equivalent to each of our annual fixed asset investment, the two hundred percent of 20%, so this competition is very huge. of.
Wang Zhengpeng: 5% of GDP to do a new industry in international manufacturers, or in practice, the risk is indeed relatively high.
阚 阚 力: It is indeed a big risk. So I think I reiterate the three relationships I said, and our country has launched wireless broadband services nationwide, or 3G business. In this way, do not promote 3G technology or 3G systems, WCDMA, CDMA2000, or TDSCDMA, to engage it and our country wireless broadband business or 3G business, do not mix technology and business to talk.
The second government and enterprises should be accurate, according to the needs of the market and the needs of business development, it should be used by mobile operators to assess investment and risk, and then apply by mobile operators to the government, rather than the government. License, no matter what you need, you need to force you.
Third, don't distribute 3G licenses, or 3G this technology system, don't talk to this problem with our country to increase the mobile communication license, after the three issues are clear, I think we have 3G The policy problem is very clear.
Wang Zhengpeng: Your three points have developed 3G industries next step, or we have to send 3G licenses, there will be a more important theoretical guidance. We specialize in the teacher today, the teacher's Sina chat room, answering questions from netizens, netizens have mentioned hundred questions, some issues we are together, some problems are very sorry because of time relationships. I am very sorry. Thank you again, thank you, thank you for your attention to the new wave, thank you.
阚 阚 力: I also thank you very much for our concern. In the future, we will pay attention to this problem in China, and everyone will actively promote the development of our national mobile communications. thank you all!
Wang Zhengpeng: Thank you teacher.
This time I chat.
