Learning middleware sentiment
MiddleWare is actually a middleman, it is doing a proxy. There is a middleware theory in the computer: no matter how many problems, as long as there is a middleware, you can solve all problems. In fact, it is not only on the computer, it is all in reality!
With middleware, it can be very convenient to solve problems. If the existing system has a bottleneck, or there is a problem with the extension, you will add a middle piece. This can better utilize existing systems. With middleware, you can better achieve your value. IBM has long proposed to make a middleware service because the middleware is available. The computer has developed very quickly. Your system may be eliminated when it will be eliminated. With middleware, you may be permanently used, as long as you are willing. In fact, the theory of middleware can indeed do this! Just when you see your system becomes more complicated, your performance is getting worse, you don't want this zishe system. . It is relative. When you add a middleware, the system can achieve some new features, but the performance improvement is not high, or your maintenance cost is too high, you can't add its complexity, you will choose to give up this system. There is a value concept here: the middleware is universal, but when you add a middleware, you will have the restart of the burden, you will choose to start. The middleware is actually just delays that you have been eliminated!
When you learn new technologies, its cost is too high, and the general company will not abandon the existing system, because it has historical users, the company has N reasons without this new technology, and does not want to replace the system often. So you do middleware services, you use your new technology, develop middleware, add in existing systems, so that the company's cost is not high, you have also used the land. The middleware gives you this opportunity. The reason why IBM is to be middleware is because it is needed in the market, and it has this capital to do this. IBM's talent reserves are quite strong, it has this technical ability. IBM has been a leader in the computer for many years. It has to do what is the most needed in the market, and doing things that don't do other small companies. Now that the microcomputer manufacturer is so much, the flowers are unique, I have no more technical core, and the profits are too small, why do I do this. Small companies do this may have profitable profits. IBM is not good, it is too big, a business aircraft carrier. This little money is not enough for me. The company must have a bloated. I have made a small money, but I have to be a big company's mission. I want to develop it. I want ... I have to waste my talent reserves, disperse my management, it is better I am giving up, this is also the sorrow of the big company. Once a big company can't find a good business, it will be killed soon. A people who have a big book, do not have to do some small things that waste time waste. Otherwise, what can be made big! IBM is the company I admired. It is the most admiring, a company that has made a large machine, actively developing a microcomputer, and actively give up the microcomputer, from doing hardware to do software, service. Not simple! Looking at it, can any other companies can be like this? Can hard work.
