Undoubtedly, software project failure has caused great harm to customers and software companies. Customers waste time, money, manpower, and some even have fear of using software and new software projects. Software companies have lost their profits, more serious is to lose a certain number of customers' trust, not just the current customer. Obviously, no one is willing to fail with the software project. However, in reality, the failed software project seems to have more and more. The software market quietly shrinks in a high failure rate, and the homogeneous competition accompanied by software is getting more and more serious, the price of software can only be the river day. It is also no wonder that the software company that has lost quality, reputation, and characteristics. In addition to price cut, can any other better ways? For the failure of the software project, there seems to be a lot. Here I extracted a friend. Summarizing his thoughts, that is: the failure of the software project is first in the customer management level is not valued. For the wrong, I believe that the reader has its own publication. 1: Management selection management software first looks at the basis of management, it is the need for the system, and finally is software! I think it is mainly a management basis and a working attitude. I have long been a system implementation of Japanese companies. I think they are unsuccessful, or there are very few software without using software; why? Because they are very dedicated, it is very sincere to the work. When I introduced a Japanese-funded enterprise, they participate in input data (of course only to participate in part), will such a system not succeeded? As many companies general manager, I am very attached to the system, but I have no time to participate; the degree of attention to things, according to time distribution, you can see the important order of things, more important things, and allocate time. many. The boundaries of people and systems are not distinguished, which work is the strength of the software system? What kind of work is to handle? Can my management are going to step? What do I want to improve the shortage of management work? If these are not square, it is not clear; there will be no good end! I have made a certain comparison when Chinese companies and Japanese companies have done in investigation needs. Chinese companies ask: There is no SCM, CRM, quality management in this software, can not implement B2B; and the person in charge of Japanese companies will ask: Can I not be able to find it at any time? Orders will cause me what plans should be adjusted; I can not send my expected orders directly to my supplier through email; I can automatically split a big order to multiple delivery time, then give me the supply Commercial, keep my stocks minimum; I have a thousand orders every day, can I let my supplier answers to me after seeing the order, can I pay, can be completed, pay a few times, delivery time, I will confirm it. . There are a lot of differences! ! 2: What is the standard for enterprises and benefits?
Of course, the so-called solving information island, and improve efficiency is not discussed! ! But what is the subsequent standards? First: Accurate inventory, accurate financial, and reasonable cost. This is the basic requirement. Many software vendors' training standards are like this. After many companies apply to this extent, they think that they have been informized, they can use computer tubes! Subsequent revenue, companies are ignored, the software supplier understands, but because the company is satisfied, they are too lazy to continue to follow up. Many times, it is implemented. The suppliers of businesses and software are gradually alienated, but with the gradual deepening of enterprise applications, many applications are produced. At this time, the software supplier is going to follow and solve this problem? Or here, it is an opportunity to deepen the income of informationization in the enterprise. Of course, the former cost is low, the latter cost is relatively high! The idea of judge whether the information is favorable for informationization is often based on the outside of the company, rather than being responsible within it. Simply put, the company has not judged from its own angle. Whether the information system has brought new management ideas to the company, providing a new method - in fact, this is not the role of the information system, the information is only the management tool, the management idea Or the method is highly efficient and accurate. Whether the new method and the idea should look at the company to see how the company "Execute", many companies have requested providers to be responsible for their management behavior.
Silk can make clothes, if it is used as a rag, it is not a silk mistake.
