It was initially understood that the Ministry of Education is carrying out the curriculum reform in high school. The overall feel is that it is very powerful. Just like accidentally discovering the entire road outside the community. 1. New curriculum reform concept
I think this currica has highlighted a word, "people". It puts the goal of education from the eyes "far", and the training goal has to turn the "high score" student to cultivate the competitive "social people" after adulthood. On the one hand, pay attention to the essence of human life, respect the uniqueness of life, understand the generation of life, and treat the autonomy of life, and take the overall life of life. On the other hand, I want to have the understanding of future society and the functional construction of social people.
If you play an example, before the education is a greenhouse, you should take a bunch of stacks, specify how they grow, the purpose is to spend more and better when selling it. Now break the framework, education is only to provide the most suitable flowering environment, let the flow of freedom, and learn how to grow, the purpose is to sell, the better, the better, the better.
2. New curriculum
The current test education has been very mature, and the frame frame is guaranteed and promoted "high-quality" education. The new curriculum reform is mainly "breaking the frame", and there is a few aspects to break:
1. Breaking the fixed class: divide the courses into compulsory and elective repairs, so that students have begun to have the freedom of choosing lessons like university.
2. Breaking the fixed content: The difficulty, comparative, bias, and old detailed content of the old textbooks are changed to the Ministry of Education only propose basic knowledge and skill requirements (understandable as only one frame box). (For example: 1-2 grade knowledge common Chinese characters 1600 - 1800, less than 50,000 words in lesson reading. 7-9 grade knowledge common Chinese characters. 3,500, less than 26 million words, less than 26 million words. As for the first How much is learned in a year, the second year does not make specific provisions, as long as it meets the standard within the specified time.)
3. Breaking the fixed textbook: Each publisher can make a textbook, and organize the textbooks to choose the Book of Books.
4. Breaking a fixed class: Elective class students to take a class to sit into a classroom, learn not to re-repair, and let the students in each grade to take a classroom.
5. Breaking the fixed lectures: build an equal, pleasant learning environment, from past understanding, understanding and application, experience, experience and feelings.
6. Breaking the fixed assessment method: Each student builds a growth record, small test score, defense, long homework, short homework, collective review, etc. to appreciate a student.
7. Breaking the fixed management method: From the management education of the Education Bureau to school-based education, give the school freedom, let it arrange a lot of things in the school.
3. A preliminary feeling of new curriculum reform
It is preliminary feeling that this class revives yourself to an unfavorable location, and it is not enough.
It involves the interests of too many people (students and teachers, school managers, educational product markets, education management agencies), will also cause relationships between people and people (no fixed class, students small groups and overall, collective reviews. The problem can be shown), social security (students are self-managed, and the school lost control), the regional differences (the gap between the school campus causes the difference in the poorestity of the students, the regional gap, urban and rural gaps), and the power of interest adjustment.
It feels that this self-driving force is not sufficient to address these blocking power. The preliminary feeling, this driving force is a bit like an individual, and the finger is educated to education. "Turn it into a car."
Because one is that the overall level of teachers can not reach, although the young teacher in some cities show new power, the vast majority of teachers are limited, and they only want to have a life. Second, grassroots education managers have to get more interests to implement it. Third, the content necessary for new education cannot come out at all. I think this curriculum change is most likely to have problems, it must be on the college entrance examination. Because, teach better, no use is good, but no one can make good bad. If the score of the required course is used to judge, the curriculum is just an existing education to change the skin.
