Title:
Recently important things 20041018
CONTENT:
Recently, the sporadic look at some management books, gradually felt that some stress did not have experience, bringing greater profits to enterprises to rising cornerstone. May now work is not managed, just some small posts of the technical skills, almost no impact from corporate decisions on these positions. Perhaps too much consideration is a little high, I always believe in one sentence: I don't want to be a soldier who will not be a good soldier. Yesterday, my girlfriend said that I was a little big. For the theory to praise it, I am blindly, huh, huh, I thought about it last night. For the current situation, I did not use it, but I want to manage the knowledge sooner. If you wait until you have a management position and study, I am afraid that it is too late, and then the position is an embodiment of my ability. If you have no ability, you can't have a higher management position to wait for yourself.
I have been doing Lotus development, calculating the time in LOUTS is almost three years, graduating for four years, doing network implementation for 6 months, doing ASP.NET for 4 months, there is Java, VB, VC, is an exposure to a period of time. And your main project experience is still on Lotus, it is basically a wild road. There is no teacher's guidance, and it has always been self-study, learn to bring others, think carefully, when you bring your colleagues, yourself The mistakes made are basically all in them.
Speaking of colleagues who have just graduated, after several years of observation and coexistence (I am a more payment details, huh, huh), form a concept: the students graduated now, the quality is worse than the generation (may be a little even ", I don't know It is a problem that the problem is still changing. From the work, there are several serious defects: self-large, no need to accept opinions, brush small smart, work responsibility is not strong, life is not said, self-reliance is very poor, lack some basic morality . Due to the above problems, the difficulty of bringing new employees will not say, and the company's attitude is encouraged. Results Every time, the evaluation of these colleagues is not painless, it is very poor, and it is necessary to have a praise.嗐, these are the previous problems, and now the evaluation must be pragmatic, otherwise they are guilty, the company also loses losses, but unlucky is still the project. It is also experienced. To combat and encourage coexistence, there must be a problem to fight, usually to encourage (huh, I don't know if it is 歪 理 邪), have to bring people in a period of time, always think they will be self-constrained, too I believe in their ability, the result is their "ability", let me suffer from the double criticism of customers and the company, so I will decide to strict requirements, not to palliary.
