The most controversial to the CMMI model is its two ways of expressing - stage performance and continuous performance. Stage types show their charm in their own unique way. Its most important feature is the "way of thinking" of the conversion organization. Staged performance mode When the organization is increasing, the organization has undergone a transformation of a culture. Continuous expression, in turn, feels redefined in force. It is sometimes too dead when applied in the fields and needs of different characteristics. However, it is undeniable that continuous expression is very adjustable, which optimizes improvement strategies according to different organizational characteristics and unique operational environments. CMMI3 has 14 key process domains. 14! How to organize improvements in fourteen critical processes? Most organizations will first classify their work, then concentrate on improving important key process domains. Priority work definitions are likely to depends on project interest orientation, such as demand development, integrated project management, etc.) or organizational interest orientation, such as organizational process definition, organizational training, etc.). Therefore, in the stage range, most organizations will choose "first taste", and replace the operation of "an elephant swallowed". They will pick the most "bitter" part first. In continuous aspects, it is usually in the most "foundation" and the most "value" area. These regions are often easily considered "the most valuable" within phase 2 and 3. These "foundations" "valuable" process area selection method reflects the directness of continuous expression - this is the lack of stage. Tim Kasse gathers the advantages of two expressions, developing a mixed expression method CMMI "constagedeous model." We don't think this model is "Continuous Include" or "stages include continuous, "It is worthy of that this model has collected the advantages of two expressions. Perhaps, it is better to experience the advantages of this mixed model with its debate stages or continuous advantages. In this way, the organization can use a stage method as a model of organizational change and a long-term benefit of the organization's strategic business objectives. Target, for example, within a year, organizations can withstand X% defect reduction rate without affecting current cost, schedule or functional changes. "The successful implementation of a tactical depends on this tactical support strategic objective may be:" in ten Within the second month, CMMI2 is reached. "It launches seven process improvement teams, so that each process ranges to reach level 2 level, organizations may be prioritized to first deal with less process domain, time-interlace efforts. Continuous expression From the provision of methods, execution, implementation, to tracking progress and personal processes, it is a topic, that is, gradual as priority. Many arguments believe that CMMI should only target an expression.. In two ways, it is conceivable that the continuous expression method provides a powerful planning and management improvement procedure. Let organizations reach double harvest in business objectives and process improvements! This expression of the two advantages - "Constagedeous model." It is reflected in the power of CMMI! - - - -
