Reposted an article from a small four, every time I read a new feeling, I feel that the gap between the master is worth collecting.
content:
Many people ask how to get started how to get started, but I don't know what to ask. I rarely read some good articles patiently from the head, I have a deep understanding this time. For example, Yuan Ge's Sniffer principle has always thought that he was very clear about Sniffer's original, so he did not read this article in Yuan Ge. Later, there were days and Yuan Ge discussing, how to get the MAC address directly through port reading and write, why Antisniff can get real MAC addresses, not to change the impact of MAC address technology, how to get a real MAC address under Linux. I have been reading and writing of ports under Linux, I always think that the ports in the protection mode have done a memory image. As a result, Yuan Ge asked me, you carefully look at the article I wrote, I have, I have to print a monthly document because I have to print a monthly document, I have to print a lot of documents before.
I was forced to smash them, I found that Yuan Ge's article made me new understanding. Then I finally sorted into several buffers of TT overflow, especially the above about Solaris to load the kernel module, then even more embarrassed. I used to say that the book is not read, and now the article is left on the hard disk but not read. In fact, this version has been a lot of classic articles, but also recommended a lot of classic books, have a few very much. W.Richard.stevens' unp, I have a serious look, Apue is not so serious, and half of the volume II is seriously read, read the reading notes, the volume III doesn't look at a page. Douglas's Volume I, Volume III is a serious look, volume II is only intermittent. And many technical articles, if you get your hands, you will be too lazy, but I don't know how much resources are wasted, how much resources have been ignored. Is BBS to really learn something? Rain said no, I said it is not. However, here can open the vision, you can get guidelines in the big direction, enough. I have always hoped that everyone learned here is not the technology itself, but the learning method and a unseafulness. Many technologies, tomorrow will time, if you have a learning method, then you still have a chance, if you master this technology itself, you have no chance. In fact, I really don't understand system security, because I have always liked to watch the program writing programs but I don't like it or have no ability to attack who's host / site. What I can do here is to provide you with a direction, a kind of enthusiasm for your fanaticism. If you are written in the
