Foreword
In the middle of 2011, Jinshan ended the 50 yuan price price reduction action of "drug tyrant" and re-put the price. The price of China's domestic anti-virus software is finally reported, and the industry colleagues and consumers who have gradually been promoted, they are also awakened by the re-pricing price of Jinshan. I only feel "price war", "Ministry of Public Security Select the first "and wait for the event, like the world, seems to be in the dream.
This is unable to hinder our question: In this moving, you will die, the Chinese anti-virus software manufacturer of China, in addition to the price and propaganda market means, the 2003 anti-virus software technology, performance of major anti-virus manufacturers, how to ?
This is not a problem that brought to each other to show off his own, which is about consumer interests and safety. If the market plan is very good, his technology is not too much, and it is not comprehensive for virus detection, slow, then this software has failed. From another level, the 2003 anti-virus software technology and performance testing is also the main sign of the level and strength of a software company.
For domestic major anti-virus software vendors, since September, three manufacturers have come up with a slogan like the "Public Security Department to select the first" as a publicity. We are no longer a more discussion on who is the first question. What we want to tell you is the performance and status of Chinese anti-virus software vendors in the international security community. This may be accused by certain manufacturers as a statement, no authority. It doesn't matter, we just have to reflect the facts, which also played the role of tiles, let experts who truly understand the data security industry, more comprehensive facts. Ok, we are no longer talking, talk about the topic.
China's anti-virus collective disappearance on the international rankings
Everyone can click http://toronto.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/tests.xml; this URL is first referred to, there is a probably aware of our report today. The URL we offer is published in the VB 100% anti-virus software testing list, which is hosted by Virus Bulletin.
From the 1990s, VB 100% test is widely accepted by the industry. Virus Bulletin will compare the success rate, scanning speed, performance and other content of the virus according to the major anti-virus software. Evaluation did not score, in Virus Bulletin, only two results: pass or not pass. Because in their view, the characteristics of anti-virus software determine the room without middle compromises, for the virus, only killing and not killing, performance, only good and bad. If the test is passed, the VB 100% certification will be obtained on the participating platform. For example, the famous Panda Software passed Virus Bulletin all tests on the Windows 2000 platform in April this year, which obtained VB 100% certification. On the Windows XP platform in November, it can only be used as the evaluation result. This is not because the panda anti-virus is poor, but it may be that it is poor in one of the tests.
So, VB 100% is the most stringent anti-virus detection in the world. All internationally renowned anti-virus software companies will appear in this evaluation, although many companies are missing in various comments, but they still have hard The head is accepted, because this is a fair and fair authority evaluation result.
Unfortunately, all the VB 100% of all the evaluation results, whether it is from the Windows platform or the Linux platform, the NetWare platform, we did not find the shadow of China's domestic anti-virus products in the manufacturer - no, no one nor . Regardless of domestic enterprises to promote their product technology, how much anti-virus engine has been used, and it has launched any international version. It does not have an end of VB 100% - we are not to get certification, just to be involved.
If the level of domestic anti-virus software vendors is really high, why didn't you show it in this international review? Because I don't know if there is such a ranking, I don't have to send inspections, because I don't want to "get together" with Norton, McAfee, Panda, trends and other manufacturers. "Computer virus also has the national conditions, China's situation with foreign countries Very different, don't want to compare, or because of other reasons?
China's domestic anti-virus software manufacturer is absent from VB 100% inspection, which makes people generate their truly technical levels such as foggy, which makes us start to explore the second question: Is Chinese manufacturers have been 100% VB 100% Scared, I dare not. Because even McAfee, Panda, Trend, Kaspersky, CA has a famous product, and has to pass all platform tests, and have to accept "fail" (fail, not pass) facts on certain platform tests. If Chinese manufacturers "rose" participate in test and "fail", they have grasped the entire topic to the whole topic, as if they will be unfavorable.
Is it reasonable?
Is it really useless? Is it not used to retreat the manufacturer?
Let's take a look at the situation of three unwanted manufacturers. First, the public is more familiar with McAfee (McAfee), in 2002, they pass Windows 2000 and Windows XP tests, but they do not have access to NetWare and SUSE Linux platform. Since January 1998, it is possible to say that he has repeatedly defeated, repeatedly defeated, and has adopted 9 in 25 platform evaluations from calendar years, and increased year by year. If you don't pass it, it is useless. If you don't pass it, you should make this kind of drum, then McAfee should be absent in 2000, because Virus Bulletin only gave them a VB 100% certification, but also a DOS platform. However, in subsequent tests, we still see McAfee's figure, and today McAfee is an internationally renowned anti-virus software. This is enough to explain that VB 100% has become a big head to compete, there is no backward reason. .
again, look at the public is not familiar, but the industry is an excellent ESET (product name ESET NOD32), which has become a symbol of quality products in Western camp, but even if they have first-class technology, still this year "Fail" on the SUSE Linux platform. Does this affect the overall reputation of ESET NOD32? No. Today, in an enterprise anti-virus product, experienced network management is still proud to have NOD32.
Let's take a look at Symantec Norton, regardless of the industry, or ordinary users, the software "cattle" to what extent, see the Norton threads in the price war this year, Norton screws can be understood from the side. But even if the "cattle" enterprise, it is not completely passed through all certifications. You can see that there is "fail" in his history. But will this make people feel that this product is not? !
From the above three manufacturers, if China's domestic anti-virus software is lacking the reason for "face", it seems that it can't be said. If it is because "face" problem, then it can only speculate on the products of our products. There is no confidence at all, think that each item will "fail".
Not a summary
