In fact, the people of the year were almost almost, but the hatred of the two countries was still there. If both parties can use a peaceful way to resolve the hate in the past, it is of course the best. However, since they are not willing to express this, it has obviously expressed the hostility of my country. Even if the claim is successful, this is nothing to do. However, the claim is of course an intentional thinking. If Japan is actively apologizing to my country, it is best. If my country is stronger, Japan apologize again, this is also a thing that is meaningless, this shows the sincerity of the two countries, but also the old hate, the new hatred, the difference between the two countries is clearly The wealthy, I don't know why the Japanese does the Japanese government's approach?
Under the influence of the five thousand years of feudal culture, our people really seem to be a bit vulgar, but I don't think this kind of civilization is not good, but we can't learn the culture of Chinese culture, and to discriminate against Japan's culture? But I don't know, I am now very don't like the Japanese culture that Japan is doing. But in my country, our education is to say that the Japanese's bad things, the education of the Japanese is said to say our bad things, that can be imagined, in the near future, the war between us is inevitable, Who is the last victim of the war?
Since the Japanese government has a lot of ambitions to my country, it also shows that our country is too despised on this problem.
Japan's geographic factors make Japanese only a few roads, which also makes him become our most annoying person. The Japanese always want to swallow and we, this is worth understanding. But in the three-shot policy used in the war, people all over the world can't forgive Japanese. But the two atomic bombs used by Americans have made them awake more! Let them know that they are just people, others must experience it, they don't want to endure themselves.
We now use a humanitarian means to solve the Japanese problem, then we are definitely unable to solve this problem with the usual people who kill Japan. In fact, my country has also used a lot of non-humanistic techniques to treat their own civil war. We can only spread friendly ideas to their people, a world of thoughts.
How did the English-like colonial countries treat those countries that are occupied? What is the human leader of the year? Like the present, such a thing is in the UK, in the United States, is it very solved? Of course, their solutions have relied on strong economies, and there are people who rely on different ethnicities.
In fact, so many wars are all stages of social development, we believe in our future, people live in this world through our efforts, people of the people, and even the universe of the universe. But our people have to eat, this is a kind of war, an aggression against other creatures. If we can't solve the problem of the original source of the universe, then the war will never be avoided, isn't it?
Therefore, we have strong self-cultivation in one side, making them stronger, don't help our neighbors, so that they can develop soon, not to dominate them. Our folk is now asking Japan's indemnity or not, we can only deepen the hatred between the two countries, but will not benefit from the development of the two countries. This may benefit a few people, but the ultimately harmful people are even more victorious.
