The assembly language and microcomputer principles are two-person lesson. Your mathematics / theoretical foundation is better, and it is not cheap. The order between the two classes is also better than having a chicken or the first egg. No matter which door you will learn, it will involve another class. So, I can only calm down slowly. This is a typical engineering class, there is no need to smart and epidemic, but it takes the step of water drop stone wear. It is not difficult to find in the computer bookstore. Get a few newest, look at it. The principles of the composition "Computer Components and Structure" were written by Professor Wang Aiying, Tsinghua University. Assembly language, you will take 8086/8088 into a door, and you must learn 80x86 assembly language. Practical value, no backward, structure and good, write high-efficiency viruses, high-grade language in the high-level language, the underlying development, always inseparable from him, recommend the "IBM-PC assembly language program design" of Tsinghua University Shen Mingming. Some people say that they don't want to understand the computer architecture, nor do they want to make a computer, so there is no need to learn, such as computer principles, assembly language, and interfaces. Is this reasonable? Obviously unreasonable, these things have to be mastered late sooner, they are sure to contact, and this is a few advantages compared to other professional students. When you do a project, you can understand that these are very important. It is impossible to say that just for technology, people who do only know the technology can do the most coding workers, but will never fully understand the design of the entire system, and the coding workers are more I don't pay much money. Regarding the composition of the composition, there is a question. When I learned this course, I broke the CPU work originally known as a micro-program design. The reason is that our country engages in CPU technology. It is not as good as other countries. Time is not easy to have a dragon core than the Intel's more than 100,000 miles, so we recommend that we don't want to learn. I see this, I am not seeing in each school! If he said, the Chinese computer science can stop, hardware and software, application, there are several wearables, but I can't do it, then we are sitting here? The concept of teaching needs to be transformed. Our school now has a school brother to specialize in the design of the CPU. It usually communicates a lot. It is found that he can apply the software design idea to the chip design. I am really good, I am afraid that I am afraid to be strong than those who are daunting.
The discipline of the analog circuit, not only the computer system is indefinite, but also the electronic student is more scared. If you really want the hardware and software to eat, then I suggest you look at Qiu Guanyuan's "circuit principle", and maybe it will look at the analog circuit in the analog circuit. Textbook: "Electronic Technology Basics" (Higher Education Publishing House) of Kanghuaguang is not bad (our school is used). Interested, you can also refer to Tong Poetry.
Digital circuits should be much better than the analog circuit. It is recommended to see "Digital Logic" written by Professor Liu Yinchen, Beijing University of Technology. The results of the performance have said this book has a reference value (mechanical industry publishing house). The reason is very clear, the practical value is high, and it is a feeling of "enjoying science". The book of Tsinghua University is also a good textbook. Unfortunately, the integrated circuit is less. I am really interested, take a look at the large-scale digital system design (more than the use of North Airlines).
