Four-level exam briefing symbol

xiaoxiao2021-03-06 66

The third possible type of the fourth part of the four-level examination is a simple answer question, referred to as a simplicity. The short text difficulty and length selected by the short answer is similar to the reading comprehension article, and the sector is about 250-300 words. After the text, there are 5 questions or incomplete sentences, and the candidates are required to use short text after reading short text (can be sentences, or word or phrases) to answer the question or supplement is incomplete. sentence. 2 points per question, a total of 10 points, and the test time is 15 minutes.

Since the beginning of the new question, the brief answer has been examined four times (January 1997, June 1999, June 2002). The subject matter requires candidates to read the content of the article in the case of reading the article, mainly testing the ability of candidates to express the exact understanding of English and expressing English in English, examining the basis of reading understanding The candidates have been examined for the English expression ability and generalization capabilities. Like the translation questions, the basic understanding of the questions is still reading understanding, but higher requirements for reading understandings. In a certain sense, a simple question is close to the reading understanding, and there is a detailed question, and there is also a question, and there is even a question of candidates to summarize. However, due to the only problem with the sake of the brief, it is required to answer the language of the brief language (more than 10 words to deduct points), but also pay attention to spelling, the grammar is correct, which makes a brief summary. From the previous year's examine, this part of the score is relatively low. If you can get 30 points in the reading understanding, I may only get 5 points in this section.

Another reason for the brief answer is that there is almost no guessment in this section that there is no fantasy when you usually review, but it is necessary to fundamentally improve your reading ability.

Since the examination point of the brief answer is very similar to the reading understanding, the method of usually improved the ability to make a short answer is that when doing reading and understanding questions, I don't look at the option, try to answer my own words.

Second, the principle of scoring questions and standards, and the brief answer requires students to answer questions with the correct and simple language on the basis of reading the article. Consider content and language while scoring. Each question is divided into 2 points, minimum is 0 points.

Second, give a standard standard

2 points - answer all content, correct language;

1 point - answer part of the content, correct language;

0 points - there is no answer to the problem.

Third, deduction standard

1. Language error deduction is 0.5 points, each language error deduction is not more than 0.5 points (punctuation and case error ignore ignore);

2. Revenue non-related contents to deduct 0.5 points; if there is a contradictory content in the answer, the contents of the content are not divided;

3. The whole sentence is not allowed to move, deduct 0.5 points;

4. Candidates give the answer more than 10 words deducted 0.5 points.

If the answer covers two aspects, the candidates only answer one of the aspects, the answer is no longer deducted by additional information after deducting 1 point, but in which it is deducted by 0.5 points,

Third, you will try the following is the June four-level examination part of the four-level examination in June 2002, please do it first, then look at how much you can do with the standard scoring criteria. Part IV Short Answer Questions (15 minutes) Directions: In this part there is a short passage with five questions or incomplete statements Read the passage carefully Then answer the questions or complete the statements in the fewest possible words (not exceeding 10 words).. .

As researchers learn more about how children's intelligence develops, they are increasingly surprised by the power of parents The power of the school has been replaced by the home To begin with, all the factors which are part of intelligence -.. The child's understanding of language , learning patterns, curiosity -.. are established well before the child enters school at the age of six Study after study has shown that even after school begins, children's achievements have been far more influenced by parents than by teachers This is particularly true about learning that is language-related. The school rather than the home is given credit for variations in achievement in subjects such as science.In view of their power, it's sad to see so many parents not making the most of their child's intelligence. Until recently parents Had Been Warned by Educators Who asked The Many Teachers Now REALIZE THATREN CANNOT BE EDUCATED ONLY At School and PARENTS Are BEI Ng asked to controle Both Before and after the child enters school.

Parents have been particularly afraid to teach reading at home Of course, children should not be pushed to read by their parents, but educators have discovered that reading is best taught individually -.. And the easiest place to do this is at home Many four - And Five-Year-Olds WHO HAVE BEEN Shown A Few Letters and Taught Their Sounds Will Compose Single Words of Their Own with Them Even Before They Have Been Taught To Read.

Questions:

S1. What has been studence of pedelligence?

S2. What do reasoning the about children's learning pattern?

S3. IN WHICH Area May School Play A More Important Role?

S4. Why Did Many PARENTS FAIL TO MAKE THE MOST OF THEIR CHILDREN'S Intelligence?

S5. The Author Suggests in the last paragraph That PARENTS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO _______________________________.

Below is the scoring criteria in the same year, in parentheses is an explanation of the author of this article.

S1: What HAVE RESEARCHERS FOUND OUT ABOUT THE INFLUENCE OF PARENTS AND THE SCHOOL ON CHILDREN'S INTELLIGENCE?

PARENTS HAVE GREATER Influnce Than The School.

PARENTS 'Influnce Is Greater Than The School's.

2 minutes

1. The Influence of Parents Is Greater Than That of School. (Description: The word underline is the key, then deduct points less.)

2. The Power of Parents Has Influenced Children More.

3. PARENTS INFLUENCE Children More TEACHERS.

4. The power of the school is replaced by parents. (There is not much difference with the photo, but change the time and "home". Is it earned compared with the second question of 1.5?)

5. The influence of perents is more important ^. (^ Indicates that the corresponding content can be added later, such as "Than Teachers")

6. The Parents Are More Important Than The School.

1.5 points

1. ^ Far More Influenced by PARENTS THAN BY TEACHERS. (Syntax error, no subject, unspecified)

2. The power of the school has been replaced by home. (Original sentence)

3. Researches Think That The Influence of Parents Better Than School's. ("IS" in front of Better; there should be "That of" before School's

4. PARENTS PUT MORE Influence Than The School On Children's Intelligence.

5. PARENTS INFLUENCED ^ More Than School Less objects

6. Children's intelligence is ^ inflow by parents. By teachers.

0.5 points

The Power Of Parents. (As the answer to some content, give 1 point; original sentence, deduct 0.5)

0 marks

1. The children's intelligence develops has replaced by the home. (The subject is wrong, the predicate is also used.)

2. The School Has Been Replaced by Their Parents. (The subject is wrong, the whole is not understood) 3. PARENTS Arefal More Influenced Than The School.

4. They is increasingly surprised by The Power of Two Place.

5. Research has followed out the power of the.

6. IT is Both Important for Children's Intelligence.

7. The power of the school doesn't replace by the parents.

8. The power of the home has replaced by the school.

9. They felt surprised by the power of piers.

S2. What do reasoning the about children's learning pattern?

They is established Well Before The Age of 6.

2 minutes

1. They area established Well Before the child entes / The Enter School.

2. Children's Learning Patterns Are Established Before The ENTER SCHOOL.

3. Children's Learning Patterns Are Developed At The Early Age.

1.5 points

1. They area established before entering school at the age of sa.

2. Children Have Learned Pattern Before 6 Years Old.

3. Establish Well Before The Enter School At Six.

4. IT WAS Established Well Before Entering School.

5. They're Part of Intelligence Which is Established Before Entering School.

6. They are formed at 6 Before School And at Home.

7. The Yy Should Be Taught Before School And At Home.

8. PARENTS Are Important to Forming Young Children's Learning Patterns.

9. It is established Before School

1 point

0.5 points

0 marks

1. Both The Teacher and Parents Are Responsible for them.

2. Part of Learning Patterns is Established Before Children Enter School. (I used a similar answer, in fact, I didn't understand the original sentence)

3. Children's Learning from PARENTS Before Six Is Important.

4. The Yy Should Be Educated Before School And At Home.

5. They are more inflow by parents Than Be Teachers Before Schooling.

6. All the factory..................................

8. They is part of children's intelligence.

9. They are far more inflow by parents before entering school.

10. They are concerned.

11. Children Learn from their parents.

S3. IN WHICH Area May School Play A More Important Role?

(This is the most concise answer)

SCIENCE SUBJECTS. (This is the most correct answer)

2 minutes

1. In Subjects / CourseS Such as science / teaching science.

2. (The) School Plays A More Important Role In Science Course. (Once, but also on the idea).

SCIENCE.

4. IT's Given Credit for Variation Subjects. (Basic photo original, but change the main language according to the question. This is a very insurance smart practice!)

5. It is weght to be good at science subjects.

SCIENCE.

1.5 points

IN Achievement In Subjects Such as Science. (In Achievement)

2. Children Learn Language At Home, Science At School (unswervingly)

3. TO TEACH The Subjects Such as science. (Not matching questions)

4. In Other Fields Except Language Such As Science (including extra information)

5. Variations in Achievement in Subjects Such as Science

6. School May Play ^ Important Role in Science (less "A more" at ^, too much)

7. Teaching Subjects Which is Not Language Related Such as Science

8. It is Given Credit in Subjects Such as Science.

1 point

1. Promote Children's Learning in Science And Other Skills

2. In Achievement and in Subjects as Science

0.5 points (none)

0 marks

1. Teaching Courses Which Couldn't Be Taught Be Parents

2. Subjects Such as science and reading (contradiction)

3. There is in subjects Such as science. (This sentence type error indicates that there is no understanding of the article, nor does it understand the problem) 4. The Science and Technology Knowledge.

..................

6. In Achievement in Subjects.

7. Giving Students Credits for Variations in Science

8. Credit for Variations in Achievement in Subjects Such As Science

9. Offering Variations in Achievement In Subjects Such as Science

S4. Why Did Many PARENTS FAIL TO MAKE THE MOST OF THEIR CHILDREN'S Intelligence?

THEY WERE TOLD by Educators Not to EDUCATE Their Children.

2 points (To point out they were warned by educators and the didn't educate their children two information)

(Because) Some / The Educators Warned / Told / Asked PARENTS / THEM NOT To EDUCATE THEIR / LITTLE CHILDREN. (You can use Warned, Asked, etc.

2. (Because) PARENTS / The WERE WARNED (by educators) Not to Educate Their Children.

3. They had been asked / warned not to educate / teach their children. (Requires the past or in the past)

1.5 points

PARENTS Are Warned by The Educators Not To EDUCATE Them. (Time error; pronoun refers to unclear)

1 point (only part of the information)

2. Because the didn't realize the shouth ildui.

3. The educators warned..

4. They were warned by educators who asked.

5. Because Many PARENTS HAD BEEN WARNED by Educators.

0.5 points

1. Because They / these Parents don't educate their children.

2. The Children Haven't Been Taught at home by their parents.

3. They neglect teaching their children.

4. Because The Didn't realize the importance to teach in home.

5. Because They ^ Warned by educators how and what to do.

6. Their Parents Had Been Warned by Educators Who asked Them. (Contradictory Excess Information) 7. Because Recently PARENTS HAD BEEN WARNED by Educators.

8. Many Parents ^ Warned by Educators Not Educating Kids Before School.

0 marks

1. PARENTS Are / Have Been (Particularly) AfRaid to Teach Children At Home / by Themselves.

2. Because They Didn't Discover That Reading is Best Taught Individally.

3. NOT (to) EDUCATE Their Children

4. Many PARENTS (WERE) Not Making The Most of Their Child's Children's Intelligence.

5. The children cannot be educated at home by their parents.

6. BECAUSE MANY PARENTS DIDN'T Make Their Efforts to Children's Intelligence.

7. They depend on school.

8. They can be educated online.

9. Because They hadn't been warned to do so.

10. Because They / THESE PARENTS EDUCATE Their Child Not Very Well.

11. Because The Didn't Teach Well Before and After Entering School.

S5. The Author Suggests in the last paragraph That PARENTS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO _______________________________.

TEACH Reading At Home

2 minutes

TEACH READING

2. Teach the children to read

3. THEY SHOULD BE Encouraged to Teach THEIR CHILDEN TOE READ

4. Teach THEIR CHILDREN how to read

1.5 points

1. Teach Children to Sound and Read At Home (more)

2. TEACH CHILD READING AT Home (Plux)

3. Teach Their Children to Study Such As Reading (多)

4. Teach THEIR CHILDREN to Read and Write

5. Teach THEIR CHILDEN REEDING WHEN ARE VERY YOUNG

6. Teach Reading to Their Children As Much As Possible

7. Teach Their Children Sounds of Single Words and TEACHETING

8. PARENTS SHOULD TEACHING THEIR CHILDREN READED

9. Teach Reading Individually and Teach THEIR CHILDREN TOE READ

10. Teach Their Children Reading At Home from Letters To Words11. Teach Their Children How To Read But Not ^ Push Them

12. Teach The Children to Read Words

1 point

1. TEACH Read show a few letters and teach their sounds

2. Teach Children Read in An Effectient Way

3. Teach Reading with Their Children At Home OFTEN

4. Teach Child Reading At Home Before and After The Enter SCHOOL

5. Teach Their Children to Read Before Children Go To School

0 marks

TEACH THEIR CHILDREN INDIVIDUALLY

2. REALIZE That The Easiest Place To Read Is At Home

3. Read and show a few letters

4. Do Some Reading for Their Children At Home

5. Read for Children and TEACH THEM A FEW Letters

6. Compose Single Words of Their OWN

7. Taught Child Sounds with Single Words Before Taught To Read

8. The Y Y Should TEACH THEIR CHILDREN AT Home By Reading

9. Teach CHildren Language and Single Words At Home

10. Reading is best taught to the children

11. The Author Suggests That Parents Encourage Children to Read

12. Let Their Children Read by Themselves At Home

14. Give the children Early Reading

15. make their child Reading at home

From the above rating criteria we can see that the key to the short answer is to read the original text, answer the questions in the question, the form of answers must be consistent with the form of the problem. Here, we have remind everyone that if you don't have too much grasp, you may wish to copy the original text, so at least one point (more than 10 words). This is a vulnerability of the score standard, which can be used when he is helpless. One. Solution steps for the short answer: Don't add the snake to you don't have a quick answer. The first step is slightly read. The so-called secret reading refers to rapidly scanning the full text, abandonment of unrelated details, and fully captures the reading method of the article. The following is the target in order to read it.

1) Promote the article in general understanding of the article, what is the article is about which aspect.

2) Discover the central idea of the article and the basic view of the author.

3) There is a basic impression of the article structure context, knowing the approximate viewpoint, illustration and the specific analysis.

The target of the slightly reads determines the slight reading only to focus on the subject sentences of the article, these parts, the rest, such as: specific discussion, details, numbers, etc., you can skip. Therefore, the slightly read speed is twice that of the general reading speed, that is, the short text of the Summary Site should be read once.

Review of the second step. The so-called illustrative review refers to the question of the answer. Usually the title is readily read after passing the book, and it can be done directly if time is limited. Pay attention to the following:

1. Fully understand the problem, it must be accurately understood, and the object you need to find in the article is required.

2. According to the impression of the password, return to the article to find the answer.

3. In the article related part, you should read the sentences before and after.

4. The comparison problem determines the basic content of the answer.

The third step is concise. After basically identifying the answer content of each question, it is necessary to express it with concise, accurate English. Pay attention to the following points when summarizing, tissue answers: 1. The answer should be consistent with the question.

If you ask questions with WHO, you will answer some / individual, and you can't answer the statement. Otherwise, you will deflate or don't score.

2. To avoid language errors.

When an organizes answer, try to avoid language errors, such as: Times, mainly consistent, sentence structure and spelling. Try to use your own words, phrases, and sentence patterns.

3. It is necessary to take the keyword of the original text.

When looking for and organizes the answer, you can quote the original text of the key content of the answer, but avoid the whole sentence, to be properly changed, otherwise it will be deducted.

4. Watch the number of words.

The short answer requires the answer to the word within 10 words, and the number of words is exceeded, it will be deducted. 5. Pay attention to the roll.

The answer should be standardized, serious, and the first letter should be capitalized. The use of punctuation symbols should be specified.

The fourth step carefully. After the answer is written, the time is allowed to check the core, avoid mistakes. This point should be checked:

1. Re-exam again, confirm that the answer is compliant, avoiding the question.

2. Clear syntax, language error. Language errors have spelling errors, mispot points, upper and lower cases, etc. Common grammatical errors sometimes inconsistent with the original text, the auspices is inconsistent, and the vocabulary is not properly.

3. The maximum number of words is not exceeded.

Second, the brief answer (click here to open the answer and annotation) After a full understanding of the summary question, let us make a few sets of test questions to familiarize with this question method and answer.

Like reading, doing reading, our first step is to read the full text, engage in the genre, topics, themes and basic structures of the article. Then look for the problem to find clues. On this basis, come back to find or summarize the answer.

January 1999 exam Would-be language teachers everywhere have one thing in common:. They all want some recognition of their professional status and skills, and a job The former requirement is obviously important on a personal level, but it is vital if you Are to have, annoy.

Ten years ago, the situation was very different. In virtually every developing country, and in many developed countries as well, being a native English speaker was enough to get you employed as an English teacher.

Now employers will only look at teachers who have the knowledge, the skills and attitudes to teach English effectively. The result of this has been to raise non-native English teachers to the same status as their native counter-parts (corresponding people) --- something they have always deserved but seldom enjoyed. Non-natives are happy --- linguistic discrimination (discrimination on the language) is a thing of the past.An ongoing research project, funded by the University of Cambridge, asked a sample of teachers, educators and employers in more than 40 countries whether they regarded the native / non-native speakers distinction as being at all important. "No" was the answer. As long as candidates can teach and had the required level of English, it did not matter who they were and where they came from. Thus, a new form of discrimination --- this time justified because it singled out the unqualified --- liberated the linguistically oppressed (oppression). But the Cambridge did more Than Just That: It confirmed That the needs of native and Non-Native Teachers Were Extreme Similar.

1. The Selection of English Teachers Used to be mainly based on ________.

2.What Did Non-Native ENGLISH TEACHERS DESERVE But Seldom Enjoy?

3. What Kind of People Can Now Find A Job As an ENGLISH TEACHER?

4. What is the result of the "new form of discrimination" (line 5, para.4)?

5. The phrase "the linguistical optic" (Line 6, Para. 4) Refers to Those WHO WERE_________.

June 1999 Directions: In this part, there is a short passage with five questions or incomplete statements Read the passage carefully Then answer the questions or complete the statements in the fewest possible words (15 minutes)...

For many women choosing whether to work or not to work outside their home is a luxury: they must work to survive Others face a hard decision.Perhaps the easiest choice has to do with economics One husband said, "Marge and I decided after.. careful consideration that for her to go back to work at this moment was an extravagance (luxury) we couldn "t afford." with two preschool children, it soon became clear in their figuring that with babysitters (temporary child-care), transportation, And Increased Taxes, Rather Than Having More Money, They Might Actually End Up with Less.

Economic factors are usually the first to be considered, but they are not the most important. The most important aspects of the decision have to do with the emotional needs of each member of the family. It is in this area that husbands and wives find themselves Having to face many confusing and conflicting feelings.

There are many women who find that homemaking is boring or who feel imprisoned (imprisoned person) if they have to stay home with a young child or several children. On the other hand, there are women who think that homemaking gives them the deepest satisfaction.

From my own experience, I would like to suggest that sometimes the decision to go back to work is made in too much haste. There are few decisions that I now regret more. I wasn "t mature enough to see how much I could have gained At Home. I. I. Wish I Had Allowed Myself The Luxury of Watching The World THROUGH My Little Girl "s Eves.

Questions: (Note: The answer is short as possible, more than 10 words should be deducted. Each horizontal line is limited to one English word, the punctuation is not occupied.)

S1. Which Word in The First Two Paragraphs Best Explains Why Many Women Have to Work?

S2. Why Did Marge And Her Her Her THINK IT An Extravagance for Marge To Go Back to Work? S3. What Are The Two Major Considerations in Deciding Women Should Go Out To Work?

S4. Some Women Would Rather Do HouseWork and Take Care of Their Children Than Pursue a Career Because They Feel_____.

S5. If Given a second probably choose to ______.

January 1997 In Britain, the old Road Traffic Act restricted speeds to 2 mph (miles per hour) in towns and 4 mph in the country. Later parliament increased the speed limit to 14 mph But by 1903 the development of the car industry had made it necessary to raise the limit to 20 mph By 1930, however, the law was so widely ignored that speeding restrictions were done away with altogether. For five years motorists were free to drive at whatever speeds they liked. Then in 1935 the Road Traffic ACT IMPOSED A 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT IN Built-Up Areas, Along With The Introduction of Driving Tests and Pedestrian Crossings.

Speeding is now the most common motoring offence in Britain Offences for speeding fall into three classes:. Exceeding the limit on restricted road, exceeding on any road the limit for the vehicle you are driving, and exceeding the 70 mph limit on any road A. Restricted Mad Is One Where The Street Lamps Are 200 Yards Apart, or More.

The main controversy (debate) surrounding speeding laws is the extent of their safety value. The Ministry of Transport maintains that speed limits reduce accidents. It claims that when the 30 mph limit was introduced in 1935 there was a fall of 15 percent in fatal accidents . Likewise, when the 40 mph speed limit was imposed on a number of roads in London in the late fifties, there was a 28 percent reduction in serious accidents. there were also fewer casualties (death) in the year after the 70 mph motorway limit was imposed in 1966.In America, however, it is thought that the reduced accident figures are due rather to the increase in traffic density. This is why it has even been suggested that the present speed limits should be done away with completely, or that A Guide Should Be Given To INExperienced Drivers and The Speed Limits Made Advisory, AS DONE IN Parts of The USA.

Questions:

1. During Which PERIOD COULD BRITISH MOTORSTS Drive WITHOUT LIMITS?

2. What MeasureS WERE Adopted In 1935 in Addition To The speted restrictions?

3. Speeding is a motoring offense a driver commits when he __________.

4. What is the opinion of British Authorities Concerning Speeding Laws?

5. What REASON DO AMERICANS GIVE for THE REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS? What is the standard of an English teacher in January 1999? Is it possible if it is a native english speaker? Is the Native ENGLISH SPEAKER is better than a non-native english speaker? The text contracted the situation of the past and the current professional requirements and qualification evaluation of English teachers, introduced the current change of colleagues in English teachers and non-national language English teachers. The first title of English TEACHERS Used to be mainly based on ________. Question: The important clue of this question is "used to" in the topic. The second paragraph of the article refers to "Ten years ago, ... as long as a native english speaker, you are enough to be a English teacher." In other words, it is the criterion that has chosen English teachers to see that you are a native english speaker. So the correct answer to this question can be: ... WHETHER THEY WERE ENGLISH SPEAKERS. Important: (1) Note The answer is "ON" object, and there is "whether" ... ", the answer should be used by the Wenzi clan in the WHETHER

(2) The "used to" in the question is telling us that the answer should be used in the answer; if the letter writes to WHETHER, WHETHER THEY Aree English Speakers is 0.5 points;

(3) The "english teachers" in the topic is a plural, and the plural is also used in the answer. If your belief is written to WHETHER HE WAS ENGLISH SPEAKERS is to deduct 0.5 points;

Please refer to other scoring criteria:

l You can answer 2.0 points:

1) THEIR NATIONALITY

2) WHETHER THEY WERE Native Speakers or Not

3) The Language The Teachers Had As Mother Tongue

4) The Job Applicants' Nationality

5) WHERE THEY CAME from AND THEIR MOTHER TONGUE

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) WHETHER IS A Native Speaker or Not

The lack of lack of clauses, the syntax error deducts 0.5 points.

2) Their Citizenship, WHETHER THE JOB Applicants WERE ENGLISH SPEAKERS ONOT.

Extra word, a total of 11 words, deducted 0.5 points. l You can answer 1 point

1) Being a native speaker Was Enough To Get you Employed

Take the original text and deduct 0.5 points. It is not matched with the supplementary sentence syntax, deducting 0.5 points.

2) THEY WERE Native Speakers or Not and WHether Professional Status

"WHETHER ... or NOT" sentence is incorrect, deducted 0.5 points. Some content is independent of the problem, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

MAN IS ENOUGH TO BE A ENGLISH TEACHER.

The answer is not comprehensive, contains only part of the correct content, deducting 0.5 points. Syntax errors (should be, the turning error should be in the past) deduct 0.5 points.

2) Speaking. You Should Being a native speaker. Answer is not comprehensive, including part of the correct content, get 1 point. Language errors, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 0 points:

1) THEIR Professional Status and Skills

2) a Personal Level

3) a native english speaker

4) The Knowledge, The Skills and The attits.

Did not answer the correct content, no points.

Question 2 What Did Non-Native English Teachers DeServe But Seldom Enjoy? Question: This question has a more clear clue, in the third paragraph, there is "Something The Have Always Deserved Butle Seldom Enjoyed", this question is obviously this "something" So what is it referring to? The answer is very simple, there is a dramatic number in front of Something, I'm looking for a word phrase in front, so the answer is: The Same Status as Their Native Counterparts.

Important: The problem is to ask questions in what and ask things, so on the form of noun. Due to the simplest question, the deduction is also more embarrassed.

l You have a 2.0 point reply:.

1) The Status That / Which The Native Counterparts Have.

2) The Same Status as the native english teachers

3) Having The Same Status As Those Native Speakers.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) Same status as their native counterparts. Syntax errors should be 0.5 points for the Same Status.

2) There wouldn't be linguistic discrimination. The question should be answered, but the contents of the sentence are basically engaged in the problem, so deduct 0.5 points.

3) Raising Them to the Same Status as the native speakers. Vocal errors should be passive, deducted 0.5 points.

4) The Native ENGLISH TEACHERS. Tempest error should be 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1. Recognition of Professional Status and Skills and a job. Answer containing some answers, but not comprehensive, unclear, deduct 1 point.

2. The result is the.. Have the Same Status as their native counterparts. Question is something that is not enjoyed, answering the result, not too valid, deduct 0.5 points. Extra word, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) Raising of their status. Only mentioned the lifting of the status, but the key content is not covered, thus deducting 1.5 points.

2) They can teach ENGLISH LIKE NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS.

Just mentioned the same lesson like this northern teacher, but did not involve it, ignoring the key part, deduct 1.5 points. l Answer 0 points:

LINGUITISTIC DISCRIMINATION.

2) Like their native counterparts.

THE CHANCES TO BE An ENGLISH Teacher.

4) The native english teacher

I am not asked, I don't score.

Question II Kind of People Can Now Find A Job As an ENGLISH TEACHER? Question: This question has two important clues, as long as you find one, you can find the correct answer. These two clues are: the first sentence of the third paragraph, now the employers only pay attention to those people, the part of the omitted number is the key to the answer. Another clue is the second sentence of the fourth paragraph, "as long as they can ...", you can answer here, it is correct.

Important: (1) The problem is "What kind of person", so the answer to this question should be the name phrase, it is best to use the attributive clause.

(2) The "CAN" in the topic shows that this is an important clue when it is now.

Other scoring criteria:

standard answer:

Those Who is qualified.

Those Who Can CAN TEACH ENGLISH Effectively.

l Answer 2 points:

1) Those Who Have Good Skills and attitudes to teach effectively.

2) Both Qualified Native English Speakers and Non-Native Speakers.

3) Whoever Has The Knowledge, The Skills and The Right Attitudes.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) Having The Knowledge, The Skill and Teaching English Effectively.

What kind of person asked in the question is to find the teacher's job, answer and ask questions, only mentioned the quality, thus deducting points.

2) Those Who Have Knowledge and Skills, Can Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIVELY. Language error, should be, deducted.

3) WHO CAN TEACH AND HAVE THE REQUIRED LEVEL OF ENGLISH. Language errors should be added to have noun, deductible.

l Answer 1 point:

1) People Who Has Knowledge, The Skills and attits to teach ENGLISH EFFECTILELY. Language errors should be Have, deducted. Extraordinary, deduction.

2) The Knowledgeable, Skillful People Who Have The Required English Level.

Error uses Knowledgeable, the word means "profous", independent of the content of the answer, deduct 0.5 points. If the specific answer is the condition of an English teacher, it should only refer to the Skill, and the answer is only 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) The people who had the required level of english. The key content is missing, deducting 1 point. Time error, deduct 0.5 points. 2) a people who have the attits to teacher english effective. There are more language errors and deduct 0.5 points. Sentence language is far from the original meaning, deducting 1 point.

l Answer 0 points:

1) He's The Knowledge, The Skills, Attitudes to Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

2) People Can Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

! ! Special Note:

These two answers seem to be unrelated to the problem. But slightly add changes to the correct answer:

1) He Who Has The Knowledge ... (1.5 points)

2) People Who Can CAN TEACH ... (2 points)

I may write the two answers that have already understood the article, but because of their serious mistakes, their answer must answer, they cannot score. Please pay attention to this.

The fourth question What is the result of the "new form of discrtrimination" (line 5, para.4)? Question: This is similar to the question of reading understanding in the word meaning, but is different from the reading understanding, reading understanding There are two kinds of words in the present, one is to examine students' ability to use the context guess words, and the other is the understanding of the understanding of the context (mainly familiar) words. In addition, in addition, the object examined is mainly the second point.

After finding this phrase in the fourth paragraph, some content after the "A New Form of Discrrimination" is found to be the answer. Slightly tissue, you can fully answer to IT Singled out the unqualified and limited the linguistically oppressed.

If this sentence is really understood, it can be seen that it means "it eliminates the unqualified (teacher), liberating the previously oppressed (teachers)".

Important: The problem is "..." The result "should be answered with a complete sentence.

Other scoring criteria:

l Standard answer:

The linguistically oppressed is Liberated.

UNQualified English Teachers Are Singled Out.

l Answer 2 points:

1) The result is what the linguistically oppressed.

2) Singling out the unqualified, librating the linguistically oppressed.

3) The UNQualified Teachers Are Singled Out While The Qualified Liberated.

4) IT Liberated The Non-Native English Teachers Linguistical Oppressed.

5) It selected the qualified teachers and sales out the unqualified.

l Answer by 1.5 points: 1) The inqualified english teachers is since out. Language errors, deduct 0.5 points.

2) IT Single Out The Unqualified Liberated ^ Linguistical Or Oppressed. Multi-language errors, buckle 0..5 points.

3) TO LIBERATE THE LINGUISTICALLY OPPRESSED NOTE Table In the future, the question asks the resulting consequences, the time does not match, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1) Qualification may be more important. The meaning of sentence is not appropriate and the text content is not appropriate, deducting 1 point.

2) The Non-Native Teachers Replace Those Uqualified Native Teachers.

The answer is not accurate, what kind of non-national language teachers have not clear, this is precisely an important part of the answer, deducting 1 point.

3) The UNQualified Native English Teachers Will Be Fired.

The sentence is incorrect, deducted 0.5 points. The meaning of sentence is not accurate, deducting 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

The Non-Natives Could Also Become An ENGLISH TEACHER.

It is too far from the short message meaning, deducting 1.5 points.

l Get 0 points:

1) Teachers Are Justified if they.

2) IT Will Improve The Teachers' All Kinds of Level.

3) The Non-Native Speaks Are Liberate.

I am not asked, I don't score.

The Phrase "The Linguistical Oppressed" (Line 6, Para. 4) Refers to Those WHO WERE_________. Question: The position of this question is in the same sentence in the same sentence, but the clue of the answer is not the same. Its clues are actually based on the understanding of the full text. This article is mainly compared to the issue of English teachers, and will compare the attitude of Native English Speakers and Non-Native English Speakers in Native English Speakers and Non-Native English Speakers. In the second paragraph (the first question of the problem), it pointed out that in the past, as long as it is Native English Speaker, you can be an English teacher, which suggests that people's blind tendencies in Native English Speaker; the third paragraph points out people now judge English teachers Standard (second question), the last sentence says "Non-Natives Are Happy --- Linguistic Discrimination (language discrimination) IS A Thing of the Past", in addition to Non-Natives in the past is discriminated in the past. Then "discrimination" and "oppressed" clearly refers to the same kind of person, so the answer to this question is very simple, it is the English teacher of Non-Native English Speakers, which can be expressed in English: Non-Native Teachers of English.

However, there is a trap in this question, which is the front IT Singled out the unqualified. There is definitely unqualified and unqualified in the past Non-Native Teachers of English, which is obviously not all Non-Native Teachers of English is liberated, those unqualified or excluded. So if you only answer the Non-Native Teachers of English, just understand half, the correct answer to the final question should be before the Non-Native Teachers of English before adding Qualified. Important: (1) The problem of the idiom slavement is to be filled in the problem, indicating what kind of person, so the answer should be a term phrase instead of using the sentence.

(2) The "WHO WERE" in the topic shows that this is an important clue when it is in the past.

l Standard answer:

Qualified Non -native Teachers of English.

l Answer 2 points:

1) Qualified in tea - native speakers.

2) Good English Teachers But Were Non-natives.

3) Non-native english teachers Who Could Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) Non-native speakers but have the ability to teach well.

There is no clear teaching in the answer, and it is slightly different from the short message significance, deducting 0.5 points. If it is "TEACH ENGLISH", it is right.

2) Able to teach english but not a native english speaker.

The answer does not specify the quality of the English teaching, and it is not very suitable for the short message, deducting 0.5 points.

3) The Non-Native Speakers Who Are Qualified for the Job.

The problem is that the time is in the past, and the time is not in accordance with the present, and the timing does not match, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1) NON-NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS

The definition of the short text contains two definitions: 1. Non-native, 2. Qualified. On only one aspect of the definition, 1 point is deducted.

2) Non-Native English Teachers But Had The Required Level of English.

The answer is not comprehensive, deducted 1 point. The English level mentioned in the answer is only one of the qualifications requirements of English teacher, and it cannot be represented by Qualified.

3) Qualified But Unemployed for their Being Non-Native Speakers

In the answer, there is both Qualified and Nonnative, the meaning is complete, but the qualified will follow UNEMPLOYED, and the meaning of the original meaning, and the Qualified and UNEMPLOYED have contradictory, therefore, deduct 1 point.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) Non-native english teachers without right treatment. Answer is not comprehensive, and some content is language error, deducting 1.5 points.

2) NON-NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER AND HAVE The Required Level of English. Answer is not comprehensive, and there is a language error, and 1.5 points. l Get 0 points:

1) Employed as a teacher.

2) The native speakers

3) Employers Who Have Required Level But A Non-Native.

Answer Answer or fully understood the wrong, not score.

In June 1999, the article guided whether there is a child's woman going to work? This is the topic that many people often argue. The author of this article first analyzes the reason for women - in order to earn money, then use the facts (paragraph 1) and the truth (second, three), this is not compensated. The first paragraph quoted a husband, calculated a bill, prove that women's work is not coming; the second paragraph points out that economic factors are not the most important, family members' feelings are the most important. In the third paragraph, step by step, pointed out that many women stayed in the family, but there were many people got the greatest fun from housework. The last paragraph pointed out that women in their own personal feelings is a decision of a herbs, suggesting that their home may get more.

The first question Which Word in The First Two Paragraphs Best Explains Why Many Women Have To Work? Question: This article is the primary title, requiring candidates to summarize the reasons for women 's work. Survive is mentioned in these paragraphs, you can know that women go out is mainly for survival. So the answer to this question should be the noun Survive. Of course, it is also understood that they are to make money to survive, so Economy or Economics can also count as a correct answer.

Important: Pay attention to the Which Word in the problem, so the answer to this question should be a word, not to "the Must Work to Survive".

Question 2 Why Did Marge and Her Her Husband Think It An Extravagance for Marge To Go Back to Work? Question: This question belongs to the details of the details. The second paragraph of the article: Macchi and her husband think that she re-outing work is a luxury for the whole family. They have two preschool children. If you take a child's fees, transportation and increased taxes, you will not only make money, not only make money, but the income may also be reduced.

Important: (1) This question is concerned from Macchi and her husband's perspective. The answer to the answer is the opposite of the facts. Therefore, the answer is in the form of virtual tone contrary to the facts. Otherwise it is to deduct.

(2) The problem is why. It is best to start with Because when answering (although the Because is not deducted).

Answer: Because The might end up with less money.

Or Because They Would Spend More Than Their Earnings.

Or Because Their Earnings Wouldn't Cover The spending.

Or Because The Couldn't Afford The Extra Payments of Double-Worker Family.

Or Because Going Back to Work Might Cost More Money.

Question I all the Two Major Considerations in Deciding Women Women Should Go Out To Work? Question: The considration in the topic is a keyword to find the answer. From the article, you can find the word in the third paragraph. This sentence is clearly said "Economic Factors Are USUALLY THE FIRST to Be Considered", so the Economic Factors here is definitely one aspect of the answer. But the problem is "The Two Major Considances", so there is another aspect. According to the next sentence of this sentence, "The Most Important Aspects of the Decision Have to do with the emotional needed" is "The Emotional Needs". Important: Pay attention to the organization's answer to specification and improvement, if Economic Factors, Emotional Needs is irregular, definitely will not be full.

Answer: Economic Factors and Emotional Needs (of Each Family MEMBER)

Or ONE IS Economic Factors, The Other Is Emotional Needs.

Or They Are Economic Factors and Emotional Needs.

The fourth question Some Women WOULD RATHER Do HouseWork and Take Care of THEIR CHILDREN THAN PURSUE A CAREER BECAUSE The Feel______. Question: This topic is relatively simple, from the contrast of the fourth paragraph, you can know the answer in the last sentence, homemaking gives the the THE Deepest Satisfaction.

Important: This question only answers the correct answer from the sentence, don't draw the snake.

Answer: satisfied with homemaking

Or That Homemaking Gives The Deepest Satisfaction

Or That Homemaking and Being with children Give Themen Deepest Satisfaction

The fifth question IF Given A Second Chance, The Writer Would PROBLY Choose to ______. Question: This question belongs to the inferred capital. In the fifth paragraph, the author is concluded through its own experience, not to give up the family life, she can't wait to work out to repent, and expand it, I hope to enjoy the happiness to see the world with my own children. This can be concluded that if there is a chance, she would rather stay with her daughter, so the answer is Stay Home With Her Little Girl or Stay Home and Enjoy Family Life.

Why does the article introduce a traffic accident in January 1997? Is it because the speed of the vehicle is too fast? This article will be imaged in the development and change of speed restrictions on the UK Highway Traffic Law. The second paragraph points out that the speed is now the most common motor vehicle violation of the UK and suits three violations. So how to reduce the speed of traffic? The third paragraph lists the numbers in different historical periods. The last paragraph of the article puts forward another view that in the United States, the reduction in the number of accidents is attributed to the increase in traffic density.

Question During Which Period Could BRITISH MOTORSTS Drive WITHOUT SPEED LIMITS? The question is required to solve the first paragraph 3, 4, 5. The third sentence says 1930 "Speeding Restrictions Were Done Away With Altogether", then, "For Five Years Motorists Were Free to Drive At WhatVer Speeds thei Liked", it is understood that the speedless limit is from 1930. (Included in 1930), it continued for 5 years, ie the five years of 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934. The last sentence "THEN IN 1935 The Road Traffic Act Imposed A 30 m. P. H. Speed Limit In Built-Up Areas", in 1935, Speed Limit was implemented. Key points: Question is "During Which Period", just give a time expression in the answer, there is no need to answer the whole sentence, so as not to say much. A candidate answers this: During 1930 and 1935 Could British Motorists Drive without Speed Limits. There is a lot of words, this flip is also a problem. A simple judges give 1.5 points, a little bit of 1 point, you can't lose money?

Answer: from 1930 to 1935.

Or Between 1930 and 1935

Or 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934.

Question 2 What MeasureS Were Adopted In 1935 in Addition to the speseding resting restrictions? 1935 is the clear clues of the answer to the answer, obviously in the first paragraph "THEN 1935 The Road Traffic Act Imposed A 30M. Ph SPEED LIMIT in Built-Up Areas, Along with Pedestrian Crossings. Speed Restrictions in the topic correspond to the A 30 m. P. H. H. SPEED LIMIT IN Built-Up Areas, the remaining natural is the Introduction of Driving Tests and Pedestrian Crossings.

To point this question, just answer what measure, no need to add a predicate part.

Answer driving tests and pedestrian crossings.

Or The Introduction of Driving Tests and Pedestrian Crossings.

The third question Speeding is a motoring offense a driver commits when he __________. The question is from the "Motoring Offense" in the topic. The first sentence in the second paragraph. This sentence is the topic sentence of the second paragraph. It summits the description of three Speeding after three cases, Speeding is exceying the ... (speted).

It is required to fill in the point space is a predicate, and use the words to explain the words of speteding, so you must fill the words form. At the same time, pay attention to the third person singles and timings.

Answer, the speted limit or breaking the speted laws. Fourth question What is the opinion of british authorities Concerning speeding Laws? Solve the question Dry British authorities, refers to the second paragraph second sentence The MINTISTRY OF TRANSTRY, and the morin word in this sentence is a word commonly used in the quotation, often means "... think", then the content behind it is the answer to this question.

Key points (1) This topic is better, but pay attention to avoid the original text, otherwise it will be deducted 0.5 points. In fact, as long as the "The Ministry of Transport Maintain is changed to" The MAINTAIN "(note the number of separate numbers).

(2) If the answer to the answer, pay attention to the guidance word "That" of the object, otherwise it will look more, it will be lost.

Answer SPEED LIMITS Reduce Accidents. Or Speed Limits Help Reduce Accidents.

The fifth question What REASON DO AMERICANS GIVE for THE REACTIONIN TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS? The title is in the four-level exam, and there are also a lot of sending questions. "Americans" in this question tells us that its answer is definitely in the last paragraph. In fact, as long as I understand the first sentence of the fourth paragraph, I see that "Due (Rather) is a correct answer, ie" The Increase In Traffic Density ".

It is important to pay attention to the way the question is consistent, otherwise it is deducted. What is the standard of an English teacher in January 1999? Is it possible if it is a native english speaker? Is the Native ENGLISH SPEAKER is better than a non-native english speaker? The text contracted the situation of the past and the current professional requirements and qualification evaluation of English teachers, introduced the current change of colleagues in English teachers and non-national language English teachers. The first title of English TEACHERS Used to be mainly based on ________. Question: The important clue of this question is "used to" in the topic. The second paragraph of the article refers to "Ten years ago, ... as long as a native english speaker, you are enough to be a English teacher." In other words, it is the criterion that has chosen English teachers to see that you are a native english speaker. So the correct answer to this question can be: ... WHETHER THEY WERE ENGLISH SPEAKERS.

Important: (1) Note The answer is "ON" object, and there is "whether" ... ", the answer should be used by the Wenzi clan in the WHETHER

(2) The "used to" in the question is telling us that the answer should be used in the answer; if the letter writes to WHETHER, WHETHER THEY Aree English Speakers is 0.5 points;

(3) The "english teachers" in the topic is a plural, and the plural is also used in the answer. If your belief is written to WHETHER HE WAS ENGLISH SPEAKERS is to deduct 0.5 points;

Please refer to other scoring criteria:

l You have a 2.0 point Answer: 1) THEIR NATIONALITY

2) WHETHER THEY WERE Native Speakers or Not

3) The Language The Teachers Had As Mother Tongue

4) The Job Applicants' Nationality

5) WHERE THEY CAME from AND THEIR MOTHER TONGUE

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) WHETHER IS A Native Speaker or Not

The lack of lack of clauses, the syntax error deducts 0.5 points.

2) Their Citizenship, WHETHER THE JOB Applicants WERE ENGLISH SPEAKERS ONOT.

Extra word, a total of 11 words, deducted 0.5 points. l You can answer 1 point

1) Being a native speaker Was Enough To Get you Employed

Take the original text and deduct 0.5 points. It is not matched with the supplementary sentence syntax, deducting 0.5 points.

2) THEY WERE Native Speakers or Not and WHether Professional Status

"WHETHER ... or NOT" sentence is incorrect, deducted 0.5 points. Some content is independent of the problem, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

MAN IS ENOUGH TO BE A ENGLISH TEACHER.

The answer is not comprehensive, contains only part of the correct content, deducting 0.5 points. Syntax errors (should be, the turning error should be in the past) deduct 0.5 points.

2) Speaking. You Should Being a Native Speaker.

The answer is not comprehensive, including part of the correct content, get 1 point. Language errors, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 0 points:

1) THEIR Professional Status and Skills

2) a Personal Level

3) a native english speaker

4) The Knowledge, The Skills and The attits.

Did not answer the correct content, no points.

Important: The problem is to ask questions in what and ask things, so on the form of noun. Due to the simplest question, the deduction is also more embarrassed.

l You have a 2.0 point reply:.

1) The Status That / Which The Native Counterparts Have.

2) The Same Status as the native english teachers

3) Having The Same Status As Those Native Speakers.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) Same status as their native counterparts. Syntax errors should be 0.5 points for the Same Status. 2) There wouldn't be linguistic discrimination. The question should be answered, but the contents of the sentence are basically engaged in the problem, so deduct 0.5 points.

3) Raising Them to the Same Status as the native speakers. Vocal errors should be passive, deducted 0.5 points.

4) The Native ENGLISH TEACHERS. Tempest error should be 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1. Recognition of Professional Status and Skills and a job. Answer containing some answers, but not comprehensive, unclear, deduct 1 point.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) Raising of their status. Only mentioned the lifting of the status, but the key content is not covered, thus deducting 1.5 points.

2) They can teach ENGLISH LIKE NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS.

Just mentioned the same lesson like this northern teacher, but did not involve it, ignoring the key part, deduct 1.5 points.

l Answer 0 points:

LINGUITISTIC DISCRIMINATION.

2) Like their native counterparts.

THE CHANCES TO BE An ENGLISH Teacher.

4) The native english teacher

I am not asked, I don't score.

Important: (1) The problem is "What kind of person", so the answer to this question should be the name phrase, it is best to use the attributive clause.

(2) The "CAN" in the topic shows that this is an important clue when it is now.

Other scoring criteria:

standard answer:

Those Who is qualified.

Those Who Can CAN TEACH ENGLISH Effectively.

l Answer 2 points:

1) Those Who Have Good Skills and attitudes to teach effectively.

2) Both Qualified Native English Speakers and Non-Native Speakers.

3) Whoever Has The Knowledge, The skills and the right attits.l can get a 1.5-point answer:

1) Having The Knowledge, The Skill and Teaching English Effectively.

What kind of person asked in the question is to find the teacher's job, answer and ask questions, only mentioned the quality, thus deducting points.

2) Those Who Have Knowledge and Skills, Can Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIVELY. Language error, should be, deducted.

3) WHO CAN TEACH AND HAVE THE REQUIRED LEVEL OF ENGLISH. Language errors should be added to have noun, deductible.

l Answer 1 point:

1) People Who Has Knowledge, The Skills and attits to teach ENGLISH EFFECTILELY. Language errors should be Have, deducted. Extraordinary, deduction.

2) The Knowledgeable, Skillful People Who Have The Required English Level.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) The people who had the required level of english. The key content is missing, deducting 1 point. Time error, deduct 0.5 points.

2) a people who have the attits to teacher english effective. There are more language errors and deduct 0.5 points. Sentence language is far from the original meaning, deducting 1 point.

l Answer 0 points:

1) He's The Knowledge, The Skills, Attitudes to Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

2) People Can Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

! ! Special Note:

These two answers seem to be unrelated to the problem. But slightly add changes to the correct answer:

1) He Who Has The Knowledge ... (1.5 points)

2) People Who Can CAN TEACH ... (2 points)

I may write the two answers that have already understood the article, but because of their serious mistakes, their answer must answer, they cannot score. Please pay attention to this.

In this question, the original Chinese has given the meaning of words that do not know, so this is a question that does not guess the meaning of the meaning, but is required to determine the article in this article according to the context. Understanding questions. After finding this phrase in the fourth paragraph, some content after the "A New Form of Discrrimination" is found to be the answer. Slightly tissue, you can fully answer to IT Singled out the unqualified and limited the linguistically oppressed.

If this sentence is really understood, it can be seen that it means "it eliminates the unqualified (teacher), liberating the previously oppressed (teachers)".

Important: The problem is "..." The result "should be answered with a complete sentence.

Other scoring criteria:

l Standard answer:

The linguistically oppressed is Liberated.

UNQualified English Teachers Are Singled Out.

l Answer 2 points:

1) The result is what the linguistically oppressed.

2) Singling out the unqualified, librating the linguistically oppressed.

3) The UNQualified Teachers Are Singled Out While The Qualified Liberated.

4) IT Liberated The Non-Native English Teachers Linguistical Oppressed.

5) It selected the qualified teachers and sales out the unqualified.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) The Inqualified ENGLISH TEACHERS Are Singled Out. Language error, deduct 0.5 points.

2) IT Single Out The Unqualified Liberated ^ Linguistical Or Oppressed. Multi-language errors, buckle 0..5 points.

3) TO LIBERATE THE LINGUISTICALLY OPPRESSED NOTE Table In the future, the question asks the resulting consequences, the time does not match, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1) Qualification may be more important. The meaning of sentence is not appropriate and the text content is not appropriate, deducting 1 point.

2) The Non-Native Teachers Replace Those Uqualified Native Teachers.

The answer is not accurate, what kind of non-national language teachers have not clear, this is precisely an important part of the answer, deducting 1 point.

3) The UNQualified Native English Teachers Will Be Fired.

The sentence is incorrect, deducted 0.5 points. The meaning of sentence is not accurate, deducting 0.5 points.

l Answer by 0.5 points:

The Non-Natives Could Also Become An ENGLISH TEACHER.

It is too far from the short message meaning, deducting 1.5 points.

l Get 0 points:

1) Teachers Are Justified if they.

2) IT Will Improve The Teachers' All Kinds of Level.3) The Non-Native Speaks Are Liberate.

I am not asked, I don't score.

Important: (1) The problem of the idiom slavement is to be filled in the problem, indicating what kind of person, so the answer should be a term phrase instead of using the sentence.

(2) The "WHO WERE" in the topic shows that this is an important clue when it is in the past.

l Standard answer:

Qualified Non -native Teachers of English.

l Answer 2 points:

1) Qualified in tea - native speakers.

2) Good English Teachers But Were Non-natives.

3) Non-native english teachers Who Could Teach ENGLISH EFFECTIELY.

l You have a 1.5 point answer:

1) Non-native speakers but have the ability to teach well.

There is no clear teaching in the answer, and it is slightly different from the short message significance, deducting 0.5 points. If it is "TEACH ENGLISH", it is right.

2) ABLE TO TEACH ENGLISH But Not a native english speaker. There is no indication of the quality of English teaching in the answer, and it is not quite in line with the text significance, deducting 0.5 points.

3) The Non-Native Speakers Who Are Qualified for the Job.

The problem is that the time is in the past, and the time is not in accordance with the present, and the timing does not match, deduct 0.5 points.

l Answer 1 point:

1) NON-NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS

The definition of the short text contains two definitions: 1. Non-native, 2. Qualified. On only one aspect of the definition, 1 point is deducted.

2) Non-Native English Teachers But Had The Required Level of English.

3) Qualified But Unemployed for their Being Non-Native Speakers

l Answer by 0.5 points:

1) Non-native english teachers without right treatment. Answer is not comprehensive, and some content is language error, deducting 1.5 points.

2) NON-NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER AND HAVE The Required Level of English. Answer is not comprehensive, and there is a language error, and 1.5 points.

l Get 0 points:

1) Employed as a teacher.

2) The native speakers

3) Employers Who Have Required Level But A Non-Native.

Answer Answer or fully understood the wrong, not score.

Important: Pay attention to the Which Word in the problem, so the answer to this question should be a word, not to "the Must Work to Survive". Question 2 Why Did Marge and Her Her Husband Think It An Extravagance for Marge To Go Back to Work? Question: This question belongs to the details of the details. The second paragraph of the article: Macchi and her husband think that she re-outing work is a luxury for the whole family. They have two preschool children. If you take a child's fees, transportation and increased taxes, you will not only make money, not only make money, but the income may also be reduced.

(2) The problem is why. It is best to start with Because when answering (although the Because is not deducted).

Answer: Because The might end up with less money.

Or Because They Would Spend More Than Their Earnings.

Or Because Their Earnings Wouldn't Cover The spending.

Or Because The Couldn't Afford The Extra Payments of Double-Worker Family.

Or Because Going Back to Work Might Cost More Money.

Important: Pay attention to the organization's answer to specification and improvement, if Economic Factors, Emotional Needs is irregular, definitely will not be full.

Answer: Economic Factors and Emotional Needs (of Each Family MEMBER)

Or ONE IS Economic Factors, The Other Is Emotional Needs.

Or They Are Economic Factors and Emotional Needs.

Answer: satisfied with homemaking

Or That Homemaking Gives The Deepest Satisfaction

Or That Homemaking and Being with children Give Themen Deepest Satisfaction

Key points: Question is "During Which Period", just give a time expression in the answer, there is no need to answer the whole sentence, so as not to say much. A candidate answers this: During 1930 and 1935 Could British Motorists Drive without Speed Limits. There is a lot of words, this flip is also a problem. A simple judges give 1.5 points, a little bit of 1 point, you can't lose money?

Answer: from 1930 to 1935. or Between 1930 and 1935

Or 1930, 1931, 1932, 1933, 1934.

To point this question, just answer what measure, no need to add a predicate part.

Answer driving tests and pedestrian crossings.

Or The Introduction of Driving Tests and Pedestrian Crossings.

Answers Exceeds the speed limits. Or Drives over the speted limit or breaking the speeding laws.

The fourth issue What is the opinion of british authorities Concerning Speeding Laws? British authorities in the question, refers to the MINISTRY of Transport in the second paragraph, and the morin word in this sentence is A word commonly used in quotation, often means "... think", then the content behind it is the answer to this question.

(2) If the answer to the answer, pay attention to the guidance word "That" of the object, otherwise it will look more, it will be lost.

Answer SPEED LIMITS Reduce Accidents. Or Speed Limits Help Reduce Accidents.

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-110037.html

9cbs

New Post(0)