These two days are ready to take over the project of Tianjin Firm. But in the process of picking up, the understanding of the entire project is very difficult. The biggest problem is to do not understand the business. Tianjin Firm is not big, the core business is the suite, and it is surrounded around the suite. In fact, it is not particularly complicated, but it turns to turn, the closed account, what is the credential subject, indeed, the outside of a finance, is an abnormal headache. Although there is still a downside demand document, these needs are more representative of the performance, but there is no description for business processes and related knowledge. The business does not understand, even if there is not much help even if you look at the code, the quality of the code is not very good. Most of the code is a tiled code, if a single method (business method) is concerned, it is easy to understand. However, the problem is that there are more than 70 such business methods in such a kind of such business, and there is no classification. The annotation is only a simple description. If you don't understand the business, this is a nightmare, I don't know where to start. Such classes have about 20, purely description of the class, extremely depressed. For technology, there are still architectures, often have a variety of doubts, but more is to weigh one more important, that is, the so-called robustness. At present, there is a model for technology and architectural discussions in technology, but can it really meet these complex business? Or use these popular things to achieve my business, can you really achieve easy to expand easy to maintain? Is there a community of these businesses? Everyone is more concerned with pure technology such as architecture. In practical applications, isn't it the business of the company's profit? Maybe there is no truly correct answer.
