A few days ago, my colleague said "let the seat."
"Now it's not a seat. I have given it to it. Recently I feel that the old man is so early every morning, why are you going to work with us? They will go out later. Anyway, I also go to the park. Play or buy anything. "
"There is also a person gives him (she), he (she) will also shake the big shake, even if they are not."
"Not thinking about our considering, you have to die every day, it is difficult to have a seat !?"
"Some old man is deliberately sitting in that kind of car, he (she) knows that there is anyone to give seats."
"..."
Of course, I have to express my point of view. "As a young man, if I don't have tired when I take the car, if there is a old and eternal passenger passenger, it should still be allowed."
Of course, it also contains several layers:
First, if you are really tired, I don't think it is, as I know, as a siderier, I should think that "people may be tired", should not feel "young people must Let ", maybe someone does not want to let, this is the quality problem, and there may be an anti-counterpart.
Second, if you are not tired, it should still be made, as China's good tradition should still be maintained and inherited.
Third, if you can't determine if he (she) is old, it is a regenerative passenger. Of course, you will see that you love the adventure to make people do it, or think not to know. Because this is not, there is a passenger to give a little bigger, and that person is still unwilling, saying that he is not so old; there is still a pregnant woman, she still doesn't want to do it, I like the station, this time is That uncomfortable; ...
Fourth, "should" represent you have this right, but it doesn't necessarily have this obligation, but from the so-called morality, it will be made up of rights and obligations.
Friends, don't know how you feel! ?
