Why is China still don't have a university? It is because the charge is too low. A truly good system, I can charge high, but I spent 80% in scholarship, the poor got university. For example, let the poor have 4,000 yuan a year, he also can't afford it;
Northern undergraduate students a year cost of 20,000 yuan, then the remaining 16,000 yuan is the government in subsidies, this is the poor in subsidizing the rich. Why don't you let rich people have some money? For example, tuition fees can receive 20,000 yuan, and children in poor families give him full scholarship, which is the rich subsidy of the rich. Now let the rich people pay money, of course, the poor will not work.
Nowadays, many universities in China are also beautiful than the world's first-class universities. But the temple is easy, please and still difficult. I don't think about it, the pastor does not believe, what is the use of the temple?
Without the real principal, there is no real educator. It is impossible to come out now, I think everyone understands this truth.
Chinese education should form a diversification of education through full competition, which will form a relatively fair diversification. Under the current system, too many people lock their goals in Peking University, Tsinghua, the United States is not like this. He will not say that I am not going to Harvard, Yale, Stein Buddha, Princeton, is very good. Each school has the characteristics of each school.
China's entrepreneur, when the company has made companies, the biggest feelings are often very tired, which is not because management costs and time, but because the social environment facing entrepreneur changes; There is a word in China, called during the day, nothing to do, but he is not afraid of ghosts in the middle of the night. China's entrepreneurs do not have a mistake during the day, but still afraid of ghosts.
All of us can think of whether there is no value for society and have two angles of interest, so that four combinations: The first is that you do what is valuable to society; second It is worthless of the society. The third is that there is no value for the society but has interests, the last one is that there is no interest in the society. The first kind of person is a gentleman, contributing to the society while pursuing interest, and only contributing to society will gain value, so-called "gentleman loves money, take it". The second is the sages of sages, requires a strong social responsibility, and the public welfare. The third is a bad person, a small person, a dry thing, does not have value for society, and even destroying the value of society. The fourth category is a fool, and the dry matter is not only worthless of the society, and it is also worthless of the individual. What is our entrepreneurs do? Mainly a first type, and contribute to the society while seeking benefits, this is the result of competition. The real scholar is mainly a second type of thing, but some so-called scholars actually do three things in the truth, but unknown people think they are in the second type of thing.
In fact, the most difficult thing in this society is not an entrepreneur, the most difficult is to face the public opinion to maintain independence, this is the independence of a scholar really should have. But very regret, now who dares into entrepreneurs, think that this person is independent, if you don't dare, you must think that this person took the benefits of entrepreneurs.
Scholars can also fell into the name of academic freedom to fall into others, and talk to others is not responsible. Our media should also reflect. Don't say that these people have social conscience, and another person does not have a social conscience, which will only hinder academic debate, and the debate between scholars should be solved by the interior.
Zhang Wei: Scholars must have credibility, I don't fight with shameless people.
