Written in the early morning of Sunday
A conversation of a thinking
Sunshineor@msn.com
Sun Xianghui
Look at time, it is already on Sunday, that is, as a Saturday, yesterday has passed.
Yesterday, when the opening meeting, I quarreled with people. The reason is very simple, because everyone is a cattle ^ * _ * ^.
This is really not my original intention, I believe it is not his original intention. The root cause of quarrels is because there is a difference between everyone's thinking. (Oh, like nonsense, but I am thinking now, it is to analyze this difference and the cause of the cause).
So many years of education, the mind, everyone will say a bunch: "Discover problems, analyze problems, solve problems", "important thinking than tools", "foreign things, do not meet China's national conditions". . . wait wait wait. When such a big trial is hung on the mouth, often, directly affect our essential thinking.
Before the end of the meeting yesterday, the Meng project made everyone talk about the opinions and suggestions of "team culture construction", so, a sword is completely changed, and it turns into a "service virtual party". This is indeed a good strategy for transferring the target. The problem is: Under the guidance of such a duty thought, our problem is hidden. It is not eliminated and resolved. Even our problems are intensified, and it is possible to generate a qualitative change.
When he exchanged in Tianxiong, he gave me a lot of advice. According to his method, I started my own idea from my head. The question of people is a illusion, as if it is very understanding at the time. The answer is me, a quarrel party. I believe that as a quarrel, he will have something to say, but I don't know what he will say.
"Why is it to be angry?"
"Because he does not understand, stand out to accuse our work and try to guide our work, and add a lot of project management in our work. This is not our responsibility."
"Oh, I have three questions asking you. Question 1: Why do you say that he doesn't understand?"
"Because he said that our iterative group should not care about the content of the business, it should not be deep enough business, but should have a detailed work guide and cooperate with a detailed example."
"Is there any problem?"
"Yes, we are the iterative group, according to the meaning of iteration, we must achieve a part of the real system, if we don't really practice, it is impossible to carry out the RUP process, in fact, the cut does not have too much relationship, if We have time and experience, full practice RUP is also complete. The key is that project requirements, we must have all members of the V3 project group have a standard that can be implemented, this standard should be the most effective in our project. Solution, the problem we iterated by the group is basically the other groups encountered during work. According to what he said, it is a prototype group to do, the prototype is the most important specific specificity of the spiral declaration cycle model. We are iterative groups. "
"What is the meaning of iteration, and whether they know how they are different from the spiral model?"
"I know, I have given them to the waterfall, spiral, iterative life cycle model, characteristics, advantages, disadvantages."
"What do they say?"
"They said too theory, they hope that when I am training, I can go straight theme, telling them that the case should be written, how to write accurate."
"How do you do it?"
"I want everyone to reach a consensus. In the afternoon, I used the actual example. Now I still don't want it very well. When I lecture in the morning, everyone thinks that such a large channel is understanding, don't listen."
"It seems that you need to worry about the training content"
"Yeah. But I still have a question, is that we have sent too much hope for training?"
"Why do you say that?"
"Training is very role, but there should not be too many training in the project, and don't expect training to solve all problems, because training results, often depends on the factors of those involved in training. Successful project team, It is usually not doing so. Their usual practice is to launch a project, then list the needs of the personnel, then in the range of the project, find someone with such skills, rather than training new people in the project. They see that the ultimate goal of training is to let everyone reach a consensus, and this consensus cannot come from people who have uneven awareness, even if we can achieve local consensus, but such efforts are usually It is not worth it. "
"Don't you think this is not in compliance with China?" "No, it is because there is such an idea, so we can never make progress."
"But this is a real problem."
"I didn't say it, but if we don't take the first step, just sitting there with abroad, there is no meaning. If you find an excuse, you will never solve the problem, don't let the excuse become the effective resistance of our advancement."
"How do you feel this first step?"
"Summary our skills needed in our previous projects, do training in advance; for new projects, not in a hurry, but first unify thinking. This unified idea is not a few people sitting at home. It should be a wide discussion. , Level, skills from the project success in the success of the project; for the already procedures, when there is a problem, first organize which is caused by the insufficient preparation of people, and adjust the shortcomings. "
"Wait, you said that people are not prepared? What does this mean?"
"Readyness). This is a very important model in the Microsoft MSF framework. Sorry, let's go, let's hit it."
"Oh, I am a bit blush, huh, huh. What kind of summary can you do before the beginning of the second question?"
"Training in the project, it is a bit too late, and the effect is not obvious; there is even if you train, you should pay attention to the quality of training, pay attention to the theory must contact practice; in addition, people who participate in training, no matter what you think Do you have a lot of bulls, don't feel what you have, a full cup can't put something else. In addition, theory is the most powerful weapon for guiding practice. "
"Well. So let's see the second question. Question 2: You said 'accusation and trying to guide' But many people think this is to give you opinions, not as serious as you said."
"Oh, such a problem, mainly from responsibility and standard questions. First, the starting point of his speech is that he is unknown to our group's responsibility, he thinks we are a prototype group. About the milestones and processes he mentioned Model, not by our group, we work under the instructions of the project manager, and our work is from demand analysis. For the process of demand analysis, we have been moving, for We can only say how far it is from our request. We can only advise and promote improvement, adoption or not, is the category of project management. "
"That is not a blame"
"You can say this, but if there is no consensus on the problem, the comments will often be accused. Because this is because of your own reasons, it is a changeable negation for others. This is actually A very serious thing. "
"Is your group not to negate the previous work? This will make everyone very unhappy."
"Oh, the premise is different, our project is required to ensure quality, and our team also has a responsibility to ask for a demand for the working defects in the previous stage. We don't want to fight everyone's work, but tell everyone, What is the quagmire (risk), we must evade, nature is two. As for you to let everyone not happy, I think this is our responsibility. "
"You always seem to be very reasonable."
"This is really a job requirement, not a strong debt"
"That's good, take your basis to give you a look."
"When the project starts, there is a clear division of labor and responsibilities to the team. This actually triggered the standard of the standards I said."
"What standard problem?"
"This duties division, is it a standard for our work? Do you have a different understanding of this standard? According to this standard, our team is responsible for the specified standard, with our own work steps, this step is our group To develop, you are welcome to make an opinion, but the premise is that your work should be familiar with our work; the product responsible for our team, if you encounter problems in your application, our group is responsible for modifying the standard To meet your requirements. However, it is limited to amend to you in the standard. Otherwise, this standard is no authoritative. Therefore, it is meaningless. If anyone feels interested in this standard, And there is enough preparation, dare to take responsibility, you can join this group to the project manager, and propose a solution according to the problem. China software industry is not lacking, the Chinese software industry is lacking is a tacit team; China software industry is not lacking Standard, China's software industry lack is a practical standard, lack of identity and execution of standards. Each cattle wants to make a "X characteristic" standard. "" I am very interested in this group, huh, huh. Can you clear your group responsibilities? "
"Our team is responsible for the implementation of standards, guidance standards, and is responsible for the standard maintenance, the mistakes caused by the standard, but do not afford the responsibility of project management."
"So, the last question, problem 3: Let us look back, where is the essence of the problem?"
"Projects or teamworks, there is a mistake for training, there is no proactive initiative for learning, and the learning consciousness and learning content in the team is too weak, responsibilities and standard authority are not clear. We welcome communication, but exchange is premise The premise is that you have a clear understanding of the border of the communication, and there is enough preparation for the content of the communication. If you are not prepared, you want to communicate, please learn more. "
"Is that, is it necessary to solve it by quarreling? Is there a substantive change in the problem after quarrel?"
"No, I am wrong ..."
"Do you have anything else?"
"I quote, John Feng, Nogan," If you don't know what you are discussing, then for it is impressive. ', This sentence as a premise of discussion or exploration, is Very meaningful."
"Oh, I want you to apologize ..."
"Sorry, you are a colleague. Although the quarrel will make the problem nature more obvious, but still have more ways to discover the problem. I will work hard in the future, I will not take it. The temper is talking. At the same time, thank you for giving me such a good opportunity, telling your mind, and apologies. "
Grass in the early morning of 2004
