Source: PConline SCO and IBM's UNIX intellectual property cases are illegally. The SCO has requested the Salt Lake City Local Court to give more time for more evidence. The IBM tries to end the case. On Wednesday, as the court heard four proposals, this dispute was pushed to a climax. Among them, it is worth paying attention to the SCO requires the court to give more time to find additional evidence. However, IBM requires the court to take the "Simple Decision" (ith decision) program, and decisions do not infringe the UNIX software intellectual property rights of SCO. 圣 圣 塞 律 律 律 律, "简 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 判 证The postponement of the hearing and summary plan is normal, so that the SCO has the opportunity to obtain the necessary evidence. Of course, if the IBM said, the evidence is not existed at all, then the SCO's success is delayed Avoid the results of the ruling. "To dismiss the copyright requirements of the SCO, IBM tandem is relative. IBM's lawyer David Marriott said that SCO could not explain which Linux code row infringed the SCO's UNIX copyright because the code is IBM's own design. He also said, "why SCO can't provide these evidence. The answer is very simple, the SCO does not do." A official of SCO said that after listening to these deep-thinking factories, the judge will make a decision in the future. " However, some analysts believe that the postponement will only make this case more confusing. Robert Frances Group Senior Business Analyst Stacey Quandt said, "The simple judgment will make the confusing to this, and the information is delivered: the SCO case has no value, but it is unclear."
