My Go is mad (three)
Later, I said that I will walk two steps, this time we have increased one party, come to a "three countries", which is the three colors of the three colors, and each side will take a step, the trimester is independent. The child in the tripartite is surrounded by the other two colors, even if it is extracted. Then, when it is determined that the subordinates are first considered as the same color, then the sub-election determination of different colors is then respectively considered. For example, the following figure (due to the limited conditions, I can only use the red circle in the white, referred to as the circle):
Black took down a point, then the white party and circle will be regarded as the same color. As a result, there is a breath, can't be pulled, and then judge the gas in the white and circle, and the result circle is to be taken. If the B point already has a black child, then take all the white and circles in the first step, rather than the black party to extract the white or circle.
What changes will this specify, give you two fun deaths:
In the figure above, the black has already surrounded the white and circle, but it can't eat it, because the two parties have set a perfective living, this shape can be called "lips and teeth."
This shape can be understood as white out of the four, the circles and the black are in the inside. You can calculate your own, even if it is a black side, the circle is walking, they can't eat white chess, and white chess can't clear the two "异 己 分" (the result of walking is more). It can be called "three-legged".
The above shape is purely entertainment, and it is unlikely to appear in actual combat. However, it is important to note that in the above first graphics, the white and circles can make "suicide" behavior as needed, and the other party "jade". This way of walking seems to be unfavorable, but according to the situation of the entire discretion, it is still useful in some cases, and it is not a trick.
Writing here, I originally imagined a few common death activities, but I found that this is really painful. For example, this is still this:
The circle can be calculated that there is a chance of white side, but the black suddenly found that he can't fall. If you want to eat white chess, only let the circles do, but in this way, let's pick cheap, and the circle will think why should I make this "相 相". Therefore, it is very likely that this situation will remain in the final.
It can be seen that in this three countries, a mealful chess may also be a chess for the other party. So I met a lot of trouble when I was disconnected, when I fight each other, I can't speculate on the psychology of the third party. He is a party to kill the chess, or a party that is killed, or It will have a distinct result.
In addition, this kind of play is also very emphasized that "Issues" can also be seen, and the death of many chess is subtle, you can't make a simple chess saying that a piece of chess is dead. Chess on the box, because there is a three-party interest involved in which one can kill the chess may give up the killing method. Only by the moses can be truly determined.
I tried to have this kind of Go when I got up on the paper. The overall feeling is that everyone must work hard to make their son in one, otherwise it is easy to eat, after all, face two opponents. Of course, if the two parties reach a tacit understanding, the other party is never resistant. However, after all, there can be only one winner. The alliance of the two parties can only be partial and temporary. If one of the allies, if you find that your league is too strong, you can come to suddenly turning, so that the other party can't work. This kind of trick can be described as "sinister", but in my imagination, this is a very interesting situation.
