Fire prevention, anti-theft, anti-journalist
Media is a conscience of society. To be fair, its practitioners must first be right. "Fire, anti-theft, anti-journalists" have become a prestigious oral English. Of course, there are now the fish dragon in the media world, and there is no reporter qualification, but the number of reporters is all shaken. There is no professional ethics writing irresponsible words, but it is still straightforward, and the fire can be protected. Theft can be prevented, but such a reporter is anti-fighting.
Today, the news "exposure" case in Xiangfan City, the "exposure" case is just a priority of the folk oral language: a "Chutian Metropolis Daily", "Chutian Metropolis Daily", served with the people of Xiangfan, Jiang Zongjun (do not know Without the national award qualification), only the words of the complaints exaggeted the act of the actual side, just wrote an exposure report in the Queen of Chu Tianxao 52: "Postoperative tumor is not anti-long, the five hospitals," It is said that as a reporter is responsible for the correct guidance of public opinion, and does not say that as a reporter should objectively report the facts. Single, the special interview procedure should be listened. Party parties. It is because of his grass rate, his irresponsible, he embarrassing the sacredness of the news, in which the article in just more than 300 words has three fallacies:
1. "Do laparoscopic surgery to remove intraperitoneal tumor", the truth is involved in the treatment of neutrous gland muscles (can check the medical record);
2, "Ms. Huang see the 'laparoscopic surgery 3000 yuan for the five hospitals to go to the hospital for surgery", the fact is that the five hospitals have never been able to have this advertisement (you can check all laparoscopic advertising of the five hospitals);
3, "Ms. Huang has complained of this matter to Xiangfan City Consumers Association, the hospital is willing to do surgery for Ms. Huang, and compensate some medical expenses." The fact is that the Municipal Consumers Association did not intervene, five hospitals After the patient finds the hospital reaction, the patient is responsible for the patient's responsibility, is willing to carry out the necessary treatment (if necessary, please ask the external hospital experts), but shall be implemented according to the relevant provisions of medical routine and hospitals, did not say free surgery; agree to refund Some medical expenses that are not ideal due to incorporation of negative integration, rather than compensation for medical expenses. (Can consult the Consumers Association)
What is more specific is that patient Huang Yanli on May 25, 2004, the diagnosis of the pastoral: 1, bilateral ovarian cyst, 2, uterine adenomy disease, collect the hospitalization treatment of obstetrics and gynecology in the five hospitals, on the afternoon 2:40 points in laparoscopic duplex ovarian cyst peelability, while homoproidism, after seven days, it is discharged. Approaching the doctor: Take a complete period of time, regular consultation, discomfort, with a medication (insisting on oral pregnant trilynone half a year). After discharge, the patient believed that the laparoscopic duplex ovarian cyst was good (patients also certainly affirmed). And the adenomensome and uterine muscles of adenomensome and uterine muscle are not significantly boundary, and there is no encapsulating, so it cannot be cut. At present, two methods that can cure this disease will, one is the uterus, one is menopause, but the patient does not agree to these two treatments. Therefore, the doctor has taken the consultation and solves the patient's opinion, decided to use interventional laboratory (rather than the laparoscopic surgery mentioned by the reporter). Introduction is an advanced treatment method, which is also a method of actively recommending many well-known experts at home and abroad. It can achieve the effect of radical, but may also have any effect (or cannot cure). In the preoperative conversation, the doctor has explained the effect of treatment that may be achieved to the patient.
This is a report that is not in line with the facts, and there is actually on the "Chutian Metropolis Daily"; there is no journalist who has no professional ethics, it is still "service" "service" in Xiangfan people. What a dangerous signal! The newsman always likes to expose here, exposing there, but very little I heard that the reporter will expose the reporter.
Perhaps the media also has its own difficulties, short, avoids the suspicion, Gu face ... no matter what the mentality, since the fact already exists, since everyone is unwilling to think this short, smashed the scar, I have to be more embarrassed.
2004.9.17
Posted by: Spicy Girl
