Software industry? In the eyes of the foreman, it may be a sungrower industry, with an indispensable development prospect.
In my opinion, the software industry is moving towards the bubble, just like the original network. As a software person, we should look at the actual situation of the software industry, because she is already very bad, I have to find a doctor to see the illness, or when I get to the cream, we have to drink northwest wind.
Today, I just saw an article in Blog. "The domestic software industry is in the" three lost "strange circles are going to chronic suicide." I can't help it in my heart. I started to go to the software to go to today who is wrong?
Is a software company's fault? Software companies also have to survive, no list, the company can not survive, this is a very real problem. On the other hand, in fact, many companies still want to do things well. For example, they also know that they should implement projects in accordance with ISO / CMM, and should be in place in accordance with software engineering ideas, and should design the system in accordance with object-oriented methods, but projects The funds and time are not allowed, what do you do with the company?
Is the user's fault? Software is still very strange to most users, although they are more familiar with office, windows, wps, foxmail, and even Photoshop, Flash, FrontPage and other software are more familiar. But they know that software is not easy to use, the software is stable and unstable, people are not concerned about how software is made, he doesn't care about this software is a few hundred people spend a few years. Most of the software projects is now the person in charge of the project. There is only one so-called project liaison, just responsible for people who want to communicate with what department or you have to open a demonstration, the project liaison is doing this. What is the specific software to do, and what kind of decision does he have, he can't manage it. What do you have anything or if there is any decision, you must ask the leadership. In fact, it is also asked. The leader is basically not understanding. The final response is basically "you look at it." What is the most concerned about people? How much is the cost of the cost, when can I go to the horse?
Is it the fault of the government? In fact, every year, the government has to invest many money to the software industry, think about the project in the 863 plan of the year. Current status is that there are many invested in the government to last, because the money gives out, no results, this kind of thing should be a lot, I will not give it. You will ask the government to choose 863 projects, but also pay the project plan, the feasibility analysis report, hand, the government feels good, then give the company money to develop, but the company is This project is not interested, anyway, the money is already in hand. Of course, there are some of them to take 863 projects through relationships. After all, it is a few (knowing that it is a majority of people, but I don't know ^ _ ^). Who are you talking about?
From the above, it seems that no one is wrong, it seems that no one is right. No matter who is wrong, should we now save the software industry? This is back to the topic, huh, huh. Do not order under, the following opinions are put forward, please refer to heroes.
1. Party A of the software project should appoint a person who is responsible for this project before the project (foreign company is called CIO). The minimum level of this person should be very clear about this project. What kind of work should be done, how to do it; Higher levels should be very well understood by the architecture of the entire project, which can make a project funding budget; the highest level should clearly tell Party B, the effect of Party A, what should be done, what should be done, what don't do And it can be budget on not only funds but also.
2, then someone should ask, if the unit or company can't find such a person. Looking for a project supervision company, many foreign projects have many of the supervisory companies to assist completion, but this is to pay a lot of supervision costs (^ _ ^). Supervision companies should have rich industry experience, project consultation, project implementation experience, and a qualified supervision company consultant can fully replace the CIO mentioned above. 3, what should Party B of the software project or what can I do? When the project bid or project starts, it should be fully communicated with the user, and it is clear that the cost of doing the project, the implementation process, time should let Party A clearly know the truth of "one penny". Instead of blind crimp, or to compete with competitors, blindness.
4, talk about the company that is platform software (this may be out of the question, and I am doing application software, :)). Generally, in the early stage of this company, the platform's architecture will generally be very clear in the architect's mind, even how to do it, especially the market already has similar properties, just feel bad. So the previous one or two versions are not much problem. However, with the continuous update of the previous version, the platform is constantly in-depth, but also stabilizes. At this time, many companies don't know what to do, and I don't know how to do it. This involves the prospective problem of the company. Now there is a lot of companies, and they lose the direction. Not like some companies in foreign countries, the prospect plan is very good, and even some companies think about it for 5 years, their software will be like, and the ideas remain so clear.
Who will save the software industry? Drashing by society, just like today, who is going to save? Unremitting efforts by everyone. Still, "" The future is bright, the road is tortuous. "
