Can electronic replace the government?

xiaoxiao2021-03-06  55

Source: China's information industry comes in recent time, e-government has become the focus of media chase. This is not only because the state will invest more about funds for this, but also because of the myth of my country, people pay more about what kind of e-government will have.

The e-government has its breakthrough advantages compared to the traditional government operation of the traditional book letter. In theory it can improve the government's office efficiency, government regulation efficiency, effectively solve the space, and time limit. It promotes honest, open, and transparent. The broad masses can enjoy better services. It is based on this good foreground expectation, the government will e-government as one of the three major information of my country's current national informationization. At present, it has placed the "three network, four" and twelve large systems "as information. The focus of work, and began to spread in the end of 2001 and quickly horses around the ground. Many large cities have already had their own government pages, and some have even started online office, online approval, online tax return, online procurement quotes.

But the e-government really can save the IT industry and make the government's clean government construction fruitful?

The key to e-government is not "electronic", and in "government", neglects this main relationship, it is easy to make hundreds of billions of investment into black holes. The disadvantage of my country's government is not that the tool measures are not advanced, but in the form of government organization, there is a long-term disadvantage. The problem of bloated institutions, the problem of block segmentation has not been resolved, requiring government electronic components, which is difficult to achieve at this stage. In this particular thing to be vigilant is that the fantasy of the e-government is solved and even destroyed. People currently have a misunderstanding or ideal, and believe that government is electronic, to eliminate corruption and can accelerate the transparency of government affairs. Corruption is a deep political issue, what is the fundamental change in the system without changing the system? The electronic components of the traditional industry and even the emerging industry have been red to the new economic boom. For example, the electronic components of commercial banks have been considered to replace traditional counter network services. The online banking is also considered to provide so-called 3A (Anywhere Anytime) Anyhow is a model of banking services, and online banking customers can enjoy convenient and fast services in any location and time in the world. Later, people gradually wake up, banking services were not pure cold ice. For example, a credit department for a company requires the internal credit department and the background customer data management department within the bank; it is necessary to repeated, face-to-face consultations and exchanges between the person in charge of the company and the company. Therefore, thinking that the computer can replace the human brain is ridiculous and absurd. The same problem exists in the e-government, and it is also unrealistic that the e-government can eliminate all kinds of officials, push and corruption. At this point, not only the computer cannot replace the human brain, the tendency of corruption is not inherent, but it depends on the economic and political system. What kind of vulnerabilities in the system, the behavior of government officials will have corresponding deviations. As a result, Gore has said that countries around the world will face such problems when developing e-government, namely bureaucratic and e-government is incorporated. Bureaucracy is not dead, what is the e-government?

If the government itself cannot be reform, there are many layers of electronic networks may also cause trouble and more efficient. At present, there are about tens of millions of netizens in China, and these netizens are about 3 hours a week, while netizens are mainly in 35 metropolis youth. This makes people can't help but ask: How many civil servants have online common sense and adapt to the e-government? And what is the ability and habit of enjoying government services through an electronic government? The government service is to tilting the vulnerable group and provide convenience, or serve a small number of people in the metropolis? This is the key to the e-government that can popularize and get rid of the same virtuality, there is no reason to optimize. China's Internet has entered a downturn in the world after experiencing capital arrogant, wealth and impulsive, entrepreneurial boom, media myths and even foam. Coupled with China's long-term economic cycle adjustment stage, demand is not strong, IT industry is difficult to get out of the valley. At this time, China's e-government has increased, and the government procurement has increased, and e-government has been sought after by many manufacturers. It seems that China's government has reached the universal universal. The momentum of "electronic government" exceeded "governmental electronics". It is a misleading of my country's government's simplicity to electronics, causing heavy electronic and light government affairs. my country's e-government has a series of cases of hardware, light software; heavy investment, light management; heavy supervision, light services, etc., does not pay attention to national conditions, the e-government may cause digital divide in China. Not only that, the "tofu slag" project of infrastructure is also easily exposed, and the website is not good, the content of the webpage is old, the "tofu slag" of the electronic government is more concealed, and it is slightly inadvertent e-government. Billion funds sit on the mountain. Those simple thinking that "new technology can plug and play, the municipal government is efficient," improvement, "is ridiculous. The government's function does not change, and the effort is put into the government office electronic technology does not have any essential difference between the new government office building. If the "tofu slag" of the Jiujiang Union has a Yangtze River flood to confirm, then we can't give it that the e-government's "tofu slag" has no flood to brush, so it is more likely to form a terrible black hole.

It seems that the effectiveness of e-government construction depends on the improvement of government governance efficiency. If it is still in the system of power to transfer resources, it will make an information on an information on an e-government, and the hidden "tofu slag project" can be tested in the Yangtze River flood. E-government is a government service, it is just an advanced management means, and the true purpose is to reform government affairs. E-government needs is political leadership, not technical leaders. Electronic government affairs is always a small part of government affairs and will never be all the content of government affairs. Only Yangguang is deeply rooted in the heart, and the electronic "government" can only be steady on its long road.

The disadvantage of my country's government is not that the tool measures are not advanced, but in the form of government organization, there is a long-term disadvantage. The problem of bloated, block segmentation, etc. has not been resolved. It is difficult to implement the e-commerce, this stage is difficult to achieve.

转载请注明原文地址:https://www.9cbs.com/read-117132.html

New Post(0)