Yesterday I saw a few games, and I went two times (all the defeat: b). I feel that Go is a magical thing, and the surface is very easy to calculate with very easy exhaustion, but the calculation time and space cannot be affected. Thus, it is to solve the wisdom of human beings. Similar things are designed, decomposition factors, etc., these things are not available, but the time cannot be relied. That is, these things are too bored, 2 people are free to decompose because of the faster (but there are 24 points).
It is because the time / space used in this simple solution is not tolerated, and people have to use more complicated, but the code is poor, but the effect is poor. Thoughts on humanity. Take a look at the size of the Gnu Go, you can know it, but you can no regrets for a few months.
Think of the programming, feel that we do so many Class, Interface, abstraction, are helping computer learning how to think, let the computer approach our way of thinking. Of course, OO has structural benefits that make the modification more convenient.
I thought of our own, is we calculated? The gene is 4-based, and there are quantum studies in the next, which seems to be the essence of the universe, but our mathematics is indeed showing us a continuous implementation ...
Of course, suppose we are calculated, the future is determined, just like Go, we have no time to know this determined "future" (or if we are in this future, so it is impossible to determine this future Because it is necessary to store this future, it is necessary to make a bigger space than this future, but we don't have compression, use a part of the substance to show all the future? Is there a collection of paradoxes?), So we still have to If there is no such thing, it makes sense when it is uncertain to continue to live. Only this kind of good hypothesis (not destroying anything - you don't accept this assumption, you can't predict the future, why bother? Different phenomena)
Biology seems to reveal the difference between human flesh and ordinary animals, but people think about their minds and moral concepts. But where is this "moral concept" come from? Chasing the roots, it should be just a high-level reflection? When we say it, it is not a thumbs up to others. It is not for your own interests, but it has received moral driving, so "subjective is self-objective, objective for others", this is wrong with experience in experience. But we can't deny such a thing, we will feel happy and meet them in morality. In the human level, morality has also become a basic physiological needs. It sounds terrible, it seems to say "subjective as yourself, objective for others", but it is likely to be a moral underlying mechanism. But for our lives, what does this affect? Absolutely not. The actual moral achievement of things and our ideal morality need to show exactly the same, we also have the ideal moral explanation of our ideal moral explanation.
It is just a different interpretation of the phenomenon. It may be surprised and unpleasant in certain phenomena, but if there is no effect on this phenomenon, then this is not so fast to reflect it.
Avoid discussions about ethics, then the "we can calculate" assumption. This assumption suggests our "intelligence", which is simply possible to implement (rather than simulation). Interestingly, this implementation (comparison with the calculation of "future"), there is no flavor of the paradox. The film photographed on this topic is also a lot, such as the 13th floor, etc. Now there is a so-called gene calculation. If we think, we know the structure of our genes, to recognize it is a code, is we possible "calculation gene"? Gene is a program that runs hardware is an organic organism, but can the machine can be used to run it (if you can, the program needs some level of transplant)? Or, if you can't (thus prove that we are not calculated), then you can find out if we can join our computing model? In addition, even if we understand the truth of a phenomenon, it is still necessary to use the old model to think. How much value is this "truth"? It may help to answer those "form" problems we have always wanted to understand, but a form of problem is that why? What is the meaning? Also we can also ask: What is the meaning of understanding the answers to these problems? However, according to human curiosity, understanding will always be a sense of satisfaction. That may be the most fundamental motivation we explore these issues.
I have nothing to do, I want to think about it.
