When I wash your hair today: We don't really need so complicated software. I use AutoCAD2005, with Excel2005, use DOTNET2, and want to achieve the purpose, it can be achieved with AutoCAD11.0 Excel5.0 ASP. My IBM T22 runs XP SP2, the best performance is best, I still feel poor, and the PII 266 of Jinlun Fei, I can't believe in Win98, I can't believe, Ghost recovers only 90 Second, each time you use Win98 customers, there is always a smooth.
Or we are really loving by this industry, like a donkey, if this is true, stupid.
Every time I sit down, the time is very fast, I have been analyzed carefully. Many times are used in the equality computer installation, and other pages are displayed. Find information, no roaming, transform keyword googling, there is time just sitting, I thought I was thinking, even if it was programmed, I used it to Alt Tab and click Mouse, I really need this? Or, this industry misleaded me.
In these days, the company is dismuting, I really think that our team is 8 people, in fact, work is very simple, and a person is getting fixed and efficient. But this person must be able to analyze the problem, do you really need 8 people? Perhaps the application of the computer is more tired of a person, allowing the other to wait for the boss to find them very idle, then cut.
I don't understand why I said that I have to complete a program for half a year. He said that someone can complete it so quickly, and I just heard that he was very strong in this piece. Deceptive, because the program was completed, and the rest of the half-year time to learn to play games, becoming the Local Empire, to make up our college did not play such games. Perhaps no one misleaded us most people.
Time this thing, I found more, I found more, I accidentally discovered less.
So many people are using new software products, write evaluation reports, write related notes, mutual help, so many people solve constant problems in this industry, and the new version of the tool is solved unchanged, when IT Is it really a knowledge economy when it is more than agriculture? I think this must be relative: For those who pay for money, Something is Wrong, we are really misleaded, developing countries are like growing children, it is easy to be misleaded; for busy money People who have not covered, do not compress the enemy's firepower, let the enemy can't see the truth, how can it easily get the money known as "knowledge". We are damaged. We do a lot of work for it. It is essentially bubble. It is only to buy bubbles to make money. Who bought bubble? It is a stupid, unfortunately, our bubble is enough, you will definitely deceive those officials who don't learn. The unpredictable official bought the bubble with the money from the sky, and most of these money entered the hand of the tissue to make foam. And the people who really make foam think that they are doing the most interesting work, but I don't know if I am just a foam, it is not really real. If this foam looks hard, which maker will have a pleasure, this is probably the source of Java enthusiast passion. Maybe the programmer is deceived.
From this industry, we should think about it. Before we deceive n 1, this is the right development concept, this is no romantic color, there is no impact of ideology and the development concept of materialism. Nature has never chooses those animals that are growing, and they have never choose those animals that can use money to make themselves. (If there is no law, or if there is no cover to the place, it is not strong, there is no money, it should die the fastest, and one thing to remember, this world is not possible, this is the method The definition can be recognized.) This is pragmatism, simple and vulgar; this is the basis of our looks not vulgar.
This is my future, although I have to do solid stacking, I have to seriously, but I have to deceive money with such a program. This is likely to make my career. Microsoft is the representative of this way, I want to go, maybe this is the reason I like Microsoft, and before, I have always been "Moming, I like you." ---- BTW thinks about the GF a few days ago, if you have something you feel very clear, but you can't tell others to understand, then the root source is that you don't understand, not that thing. Will not be able to pass .. There is no natural science in history, it can only usually make a matter, and the social science that can only be considered is that the discipline itself is not deep enough, so people can mess up, just like the early natural scientists, it is not right. If the study is not deep, this is unclear.
