Note: This article has been published to "Developing Master" Journal No. 2004. Copyright belongs to Netfire himself, magazine and 9CBS, if you need to reprint, please contact me or magazine, thank you!
University graduation design, when the students will experience, they have experienced the mystery of them. It is a teacher, those so-called "mystery" is what I have to try to avoid. I first took graduation design in 2004, but I found that I can't avoid anything ... Only silently abide by the existing "rules", let's let "mystery" ...
In the second half of 2003, I was told that I would bring the graduation design of the 2004 electronic information engineering professional student, so I started to be joined. In my eyes, students of electronic information engineering students should have any questions about programming; then, in addition, this will be my first graduation design, so an additional emphasis, I will pay my topic at the end of the year. At the beginning of this year, I started writing a short message, ready to choose the student of my topic, I hope they can recognize the importance of the topics through my telling, and shake the spirit, completely put the whole. The topic of the proposed at the time was - to the topic of the topic of my topic. The first time I came into contact with the mid-this March, after the school's graduation design mobilization meeting, the mentor and the students met, and the results found that they have not seen the topic. They have not given them the topic at all, just in accordance with certain rules. Group. 10 people in our group, I have a preliminary understanding - ask: What languages have you learned before? Answer: 8 people C, 2 people qb. Ask: How many people are more familiar with computers, or is more familiar with computers or networks? (Chatting those are not counted) answer: ... Ask: How many people understand the B / S structure or C / S structure? Answer: ... Ask: How many people use VB, VC or ASP, PHP, etc. Answer: ... Ask here, I have already been witnessed ... I went to say that we have some questions (90% of the topic I am involved in programming), and the relevant preparatory knowledge, the problem is difficult Wait. The students have not yet listened to the surprise - I have to learn a new language? To write a program? ...... Then I will copy the list of questions, and the preparation knowledge of each topic, and then tell them to go back to the topic. If I feel that I can't do it, I will contact my college. The students scattered ... I explained to the team leader in our group, and then I will prepare for about one day with another colleague. My main thing is to introduce the relevant things of B / S, and it is best to use an instance to tell how to complete it step by step. And another colleague is primarily speaking database knowledge. Speaking of this and student's first contact, I am screaming with my colleagues. How can an electronic information engineering? Does these topics really should not do it? Later, and a teacher with a computer application professional, I didn't talk about it. I found that his situation wouldn't go ... So, I only had hard scalp at that time, I hope that students can compete.
Shortly after this, I used my colleagues to give them a general introduction. Finally, I took three students, two girls do B / S procedural, a boy to do B / S and C / S integrated procedures. (For the convenience of the article, referred to as - girl A, girl B, and boys a) I didn't tell me about the short message, because I think it is not suitable. Their foundation is too bad ...
After booking, after graduation design preparatory knowledge, they also selected the topic, and their respective preparations. At this time, they all often come to me, maybe it is not enough to understand the topic, not very good, so I am very patiently given them. It is also possible to give them a reference book, let them go to the library to borrow, so as not to be late. Such starting, very good, because I have always thought - the attitude determines everything. Although they are not good, it is very gratified. The answer is very good, at least I personally satisfied with my student's work, especially the understanding of the topic, more than my expect. But I also found a problem - not independent! I have to ask me to open the question defense slide format, content framework. After the opening defense, I found them three, saying how to do it next step, what should I pay attention to? Before the opening debate, I think I need to look at these three students every day. I often greeten. Ask the progress, but the success of their success makes me relax, I think it will give them freedom, let them play, there is What questions I have worked hard to solve them, I'm talking about the heart to tell them - you work hard, there will be no relationship, we solve the problem together. If the end is not complete, I will still consider it as appropriate. Seriousness is willing to violate ... Starting in the middle of the time, girl A is very active, and growing faster under my guidance. In addition, the analysis of the topic is now in the database modeling and the familiar language programming phase. It can gradually find that she doesn't come to me, I have said a few times, I also said to work, I forgive her, because she said before starting. The girl B is better than the girl A, and I will have a total of two times and have never come again. Every time I come, I let her go back and ask the girl B, let her talk to me, I can't come every time. Boys a. The opening defense is very good. There are not many come, and each problem is very small. After completing English translation, it is hard.
It seems that this is my mistake. I shouldn't let them go so. I think if I have to take them close, the situation will not be this - more than half of the one in 11 weeks , In accordance with the school practice for punctual interpretation. The boy A actually changed the content of the task book, directly reducing the difficulty to the message, the C / S part is not, 6-7 weeks wrote less than 30K code ... Two girls even one code I haven't written ... girl A even said - "... May 1 is not going to rest, can understand ..." I suddenly fire ... "May 1 holiday is not in your next time? Then you Go to ask your dean, if he said no, I can extend you a week ... "" You think can you make a clever in me? I just said that I will say it here, I am one here, II is two Other impossible. "" But you can't do the most, you can't do it ... "" I said so? I am talking about, you have worked hard, I can't say it. But you now do it now. What? There are still 4 weeks, you have at least one week to write a papers, what do you do? "..................
Then, people happen more unexpected things. When the girl b is still ignored, I also decided to see what she could do, I have to give me here, go to the defense. The girl A gradually exposed my horse foot, the design also stayed in demand analysis, concept design phase. The boys a must not have, actually change my task book, of course, finally being persuaded, old and old. Time is in such a process, I keep discovering their problems, constantly pointing out how to change, I need to do it, I don't let me satisfied every time ......... I think, you do it, no matter what the final result, As long as I see you hard, I hope you can live! I have repeatedly emphasized the work you have done again and again. Other introductory things are less written. The papers came out, my heart is very clear how many components they have. When I rigidly browsed the papers they handed over, I found a very big problem - they all changed their original design, and some signs show that they are now "What made" is completely plagiarism. Everyone's papers, unfortunate points, long-term big interlaced technology is simple, almost rarely involved their work. More winners, actually appear - when conducting the design of Xinli Group's website, I chose McOMEDIA's webpage production three swordsmen: Dreamweaver, Firework and Flash. When did I tell him the "Xinli Group"? ? ? ! ! Of course, they did not show me what they did. I started to call a call - "The afternoon put your finished product or semi-finished products to me." As a result, the girl A ended up, and the girl B was doing with a classmate, the girl B is from the Internet A program, the boys A completely completed 60% of the B / S portion (the same online program is changed), and the C / S section has made several interfaces, and it will not be able to run.
In fact, from the beginning I hope they can try to learn something, I have completed it independently, and I will hopes that they will try to do it. As long as I do it, I will try my best to make them all. But so, I really don't know how to make them? As the saying goes: temporarily hold Buddha foot, but they don't even know what is the feet? How to hold? Finally, I will find them separately to talk about their design. I am listed in my opinion. I will give them a variety of words. How to change it, I hope they can seriously change, like it. reply. It can be said that here, I have made the biggest concessions, I hope they can pass. Nowadays, I have to reflect on myself - I haven't started at all, I'm too fantasy, I would like to choose the student of my topic, I hope they don't have eight or half pounds. When the student is in contact, it is not what I imagine so good, then start adjusting the mentality, I hope to do this graduation design with these students. Before the opening debts, I would like to hurry these students, because they are not very good. But their opening privileges made me very surprised. I saw that they pre-preparatory work is still more, I think I may not need to look like primary school students. I am too trusting them in the next day. When the graduation design was inspected, they found many of their problems, I had to decide to grasp them again, check their progress at least twice a week. Because I found these students, I have a large extent to a large extent after the opening defense. In the end, I am still disappointed. Although they have been analyzed and designed, they can be coded, they can't do it, because they don't spend time at all, they have to learn the language. They only do it, let them give finished products or semi-finished products. It is unrealistic. The fact is true, they are given, not the code coming back, it is only the interface, or it is not to help it (of course, it can't complete the function after the analysis) ... The facts prove that they do not And my guidance is also failed. So, I explain to other teachers, and then prepare how to do it when reviewing / reviewing their papers. rule! ? Two days before the defense, the teacher of our reply group took out all the graduation papers. First, I will review my students' papers and write a review. Then handed over to other teachers, and finally decided to go to the graduation defense.
I have a three student, I am old and I have a good review. The personal opinions of materials that have been completed during the first period of time, the final work, and the final submitted papers, etc. Then, I asked the head of my group, and the team leader said to let them participate in the defense, so I gave them a proposed score - 60 points. (In fact, when I see their papers again, I almost "lick", they are almost in order to use ... As for the review of opinions, I will write anything in violation of my own principles. What is the last defense, just look at themselves. When I wrote the review of other students, I really don't know how to write some students to have some teachers, I have to see others, the result ... ......! ! ? ? ! ! I am exactly the following - the materials submitted by the student are detailed, the graduation design tasks are basically completed, which meets the relevant requirements of graduation design. The paper reflects the workflow, design ideas, research routes, design processes of the item management system, and reflects the idea of software engineering. The design of the program interface is clearer, concise, and basically completed the relevant tasks specified by the task book. English translation is relatively smooth and accurate. The graduation design workload is basically full, meets the requirements, and the recommended defense. I didn't look at this student's paper, but his guiding teacher is my colleague. From the beginning, I have not seen himself a few times. And from the usual chat, this student is not very good, but also makes me a headache, but another teacher gives my colleague this student's review opinion? ? ? ! ! Let me be shocked. This is not forbidden to make me think of a graduation defense for computer application to see when I have just graduated for almost a year. I took a plate with my colleagues who graduated from the same year. I listened to the students' defense, a series of questions, let the student dumb. In fact, those basic issues, as long as they are independently completed. A few students are brought by him, and a few have been asked, he only maintains his own students to answer. Does he experienced the pain like me, but also helpless? Is this the rule? In the blog of my subscription, I also saw teachers in other colleges, also for this headache. I don't dare to say that "rules" is to let the people pass by eight percent, and the two percent people are unlucky. I only hope that every step in the whole process is true, all the reactions of the actual situation! Facts are in front of me - not as I think! Please allow me to boldly assume, other teachers' reviews, maybe - is this! ! why? ? I take this question to participate in the reply ............
The defense respond is basically carried out in a relatively mild atmosphere. Generally only reviews the teacher and hosted the teacher. Very precocile reply, the problem seems to be some editing, or too floating, answering the east, but it is all appreciated by the teacher. ... I didn't like last year, I will cut the big knife, just silently looked there, every student, the doctrine of the doctrine. And I have brought the truth, I don't violate my principles, for other teachers, I have not helped me to defend my students, let's reply. Suddenly, the scene of my graduation reply - I was the first in the afternoon, the big classroom, the front zero zero scattered some teachers, followed by the bustling of this reply group. My classmates. I was a subproject of an Oilfield ERP project, I did it with another classmate, and he made a front desk. I made my graduation papers into a slide outline, and then explain how I started, how to choose technology, what problems encountered, etc., then ask questions. I don't know who my review teacher is, I only remember that there were two teachers to ask me, a total of four questions, and asked about interface design and future e-commerce ... The last result is of course not good, I bring The two girls should also participate in the so-called "Rack Avoidance" because they can't demonstrate the procedures, and the boys are lucky ......... After I heard, the two girls have passed. At that time, I didn't have a sense of accomplishment, no joy, no pleasure, but an abnormally lost, fascinated, 惆怅 ...
