The impact of "strong people" on the company's operating costs:
> The easiest and direct idea, with a strong person of 10, even if you take 5 times the salary, the capitalist can also get 5 times the gross profit, then minus a little fixed capital, or greatly profit. It is very reasonable from the surface, but he has a limitations, the premise is only for individuals. In a person's company, personal profits can be equivalent to the company's profits, while the company has expanded, which will not be as simple.
> If the high efficiency of 1 strongman has played a role model to another 10 people, everyone has an additional passion, which is gratifying. But there is no need to develop in the direction expected, and the other 10 people seem to have only one half of the work, and 11 people have done 10 people, while salary is 15 people. This account is cut down, it is too depressed, I believe that all bosses will be heartbroken.
> The problem is concentrated to other human efficiency problems, overall efficiency issues. If 1 strongman only does 8 people's work, putting another 2 jobs together in cooperation with other 10 people, putting the team building, just like a stepper team must have two rescue guards, timely remedy on the battlefield You can save a lot of effort. As long as there are 2 excited into 1 when 10 people can ensure that the cost accounting is high.
The "Strong Man" itself does not have any problems. The problem is whether the company has a construct of "strong people" team. The "strong person" here has extended a team that has unexpected team, how to effectively organize the rejuvenation team capability The problem was on.
