The important position of "strong people" in the development of small companies:
> First, state the "small" and "strong people" are the concept of mutual contrast, in the first-class company of talents, the primary task of people who can be called "strong people" is to do "ordinary".
> Software companies in Zhongguancun, a small company, two or three small companies, only one product, only one, a person's production line, channel stenosis, resulting in any "wind blowing". At this time, "strong people" was born, he had extraordinary perseverance and courage, defeating a difficult intervention, finally achieved "success." They were called "Hero" as the idol of countless programmers.
> As long as the company starts to walk, the business is not in a single, the tentacles should not choose the depth, do not choose breadth, at this time, a "hero" is difficult to facilitate the situation, and countless "San Tao" scene appears before the "lens". This is the key to the company's jumping development.
> We have quantified a strong man's role to "1 when 10", and the company's productivity is measured with equivalent. In other words, if a 1 person company, only 1 person is a strong person, then the company's productivity is 10. In this way, according to simple data, the average annual company can increase a strong person, then the company's productivity improvement has increased the company's size and company productivity in 10 years:
Company scale: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 100,
The company's productivity: 100%, 50%, 25%, 20%, 16%, 14%, 12.5% 1%.
> When the company is 100 people, the efficiency of productivity will only be 1%. This is also a good luck in the company's development stage, and the level of strong people is in place, and do not consider 100 strong people will be in a company. What is the situation.
So, to ensure the company's stable development, most major companies adopt, appropriate sacrifices to the growth rate of the company, in exchange for stable growth
> This speed loss should be spending time is often: an effortless team with a "strong man", or has a good combat team, just as: the infantry end with TANK's aggressive array. Perhaps the construction of the team around the "strong man" is far less easy. Relatively speaking, let the "strong people" appropriately reduce and work with others, and the combat power of the team formed, can make up for the "loss" that does not fully play "strong people" ability.
> I said that I am like running the question. In fact, I will explain a "strong man" should flood in the ocean fighting in the team. From a certain angle, it seems that "strong people" lost their own opportunities, but from another perspective, if it can become a group of collectives that achieve greater achievements, the achievement and team's return must be true. "Strong People" is proud and proud.
> Do you choose to do "strong people"?
