I have been recruiting testers, constant interviews, but it is always a good test person.
First of all, people who are willing to do test work are relatively small.
Most IT workers have a unique closure for development work, like to write code, do not like to make a more boring test work. So most resumes I have received are ladies or graduates. It is not my gender discrimination, because our ladies here are already more, and IT work is still more tired, it = I'm Tired, huh, I am afraid that MM will not suffer. New graduates, generally do not have too many experiences, need to be trained after a certain period of time, but good plasticity, some new thinking, use our Leader to say that you can wash your brain, but it is often horizontal The relatively high graduates like the process of developing classes, no professional learning software test, do not know how to ask questions when interview. I also have a master's professional in software engineering, but I haven't seen the effort to be stronger now.
Second, the requirements for testing are relatively wide.
In fact, I think a tester should be the kind of knowledge, but it will not be required to achieve every aspect, it is best to stand on the system's perspective. For example, it is best to use every UNIX platform for a while, each database has been used for a while, most of the mainstream development language, development tools have seen, it is best to use, but not required to be proficient Language. In fact, we also like those who have been developing for a while, join the test team, in accordance with the requirements of the testers in the textbook, in fact, it is also demanding design, development, huh, but now it is often not high. , People who can't be developed think of "I can do test it", my attitude is: As long as it is in the interview, this idea is not! Because I think the most important thing to recruit testers is to see that this person is interested in the test work itself. If it is just to say that the company is saying, it will be avoided.
Finally, some misunderstandings are misunderstood.
The average person thinks that the test work is to take someone else's things, just click on the click, there is a problem, this kind of work is boring and boring, salary is definitely less than the developer. This can only be said to be a misunderstanding. In fact, no matter how the actual test work is now, it is definitely an indispensable part of the R & D process, it is also an important part of quality assurance. If you don't say it, you don't say it. I feel that if you do your test work, you still have a lot, this "deep" is still paying attention to, you have to do test characteristics, don't always follow the developer Give them a deficiencies, such as the application of test tools, test case design and implementation, management and analysis of defects, etc., as long as they do deeply, it is a very deep learning, which is never to find someone It is ok to press the east point. In addition, since the test and development are one ring in the R & D link, why is the payroll of the tester better than the developer? At least in our company is not absolute. So I saw some resumes for the posting test position, "expective salary" written 1000 ~ 1999 yuan / month, is this the value of testing in his mind? If you have no confidence in this work, let's talk about your work deeply?
Oh, due to the recruitment of the competent testers, the heart is urgent, now a lot of things will continue to increase, the recruitment indicators apply, and the person is still in place, so I wrote a bunch of words, but also This time the interview works.
We also post posts on the website to make recruitment promotion, hoping to recruit real test masters http://www.sztest.net/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7023
http://www.testage.net/bbs/dispbbs.asp?boardid=8&id=2573
Don't write, someone will come to interview.
