Human pieces "productivity investigation" and "investigation of individual productivity costs"
I am a person who is not reading efficient. It didn't become Jin Yong fan because I only saw three works, and each department had to see 2 weeks, and to be willing to drink. Plus now is busy, information explosion, too many books are tempting us, "people" is a long time, I bought a book, until I haven't finished it, I only see Chapter 8. Perhaps my reading habits are too bad, this is not, I have seen less than 3, I want to write something.
"Productivity Survey" is a comparative authority investigation by Chapter 8 of "Chapter". The entire survey process is very dense. At least there are at least many points worth trusting. Data that have accumulated for many years. The company has a lot of households, which is complete, and anywhere is reflected. The spirit of science (I have extended).
The result of the survey is that the development efficiency of high productivity developers is several times that of low productivity developers. Similarly, their working environment has significant differences, the former is better than the latter; there is the same development efficiency personnel They are all in the same company. The author gives 2 conclusions: because the working environment is good, the development efficiency is high; or the development efficiency will choose a company with good working environment, or the company that is poor work is unable to keep working with high work efficiency.
I quote this "survey" and his conclusion is to lead my think: Is the individual productivity consistent with their remuneration?
It is believed that the author is to explain that attention is valuable to improve the company's competitiveness and is suitable for the current "competitive" social approval. However, the author did not say that the two conclusions were that he thought it was correct. I guess is that the author knows that the results of the survey are different for readers' meaning. But if the author is a survey to analyze individual productivity and their remuneration, the company's cost is analyzed, the company CEO will be more willing to adopt this data, because shareholders can judge, pay attention to human capital investment Whether it matches the higher productivity obtained. (If this is a deep distort the author's intention, I hope the author is not necessarily mind)
At first, when I read "people", it was because I would like to get some nutrients in the articles of "sculpture". Because, it is not possible to persist, and "sculpture" is different, so we wrote those lengthy words. "Sculpture" was originally a "collaborative" thinking, hoping to solve the problem of waste of total social resources in the long run, unable to condense. (Friends have repeatedly reminded me, this is a "ideal") because I can't evaluate the starting point of the author of "people", but I am on the bookmark of the bookstore, more, popular is to teach you how to get competitive advantage The discussion of balance between cost and value is the subject.
Three phenomena: 1 is a worker with high productivity has received less compensation and at least matches. 2 is a laborer having a low productivity does not have a productivity. 3 is that productivity cannot be condensed and unable to shake a larger market.
Ideal: All productivity can be condensed together, whether it is a small addition of simple addition, loss is allowed, but it must be increased. This will make bigger markets, achieve greater achievements, which is the maximum savings of productivity, but also respect.
Friends introduced that there is a considerable scholar to recognize similar problems, which is actively trying, perhaps in brewing greater productivity change. I am now practicing, I hope to dig "ideal" business value to sufficient, just the value of the ideal implementation of the future is not enough, excavate the value of the "ideal" process, which helps people's investment.
