If you only look at the bad place, even if you look accurate, what is it there? British philosopher bacterina also warned: "There is no need to save the authors when reading," Some people like to argue, but for argumentation, give up from the other party (whether it is a person or a book) to absorb nutrition opportunities, it is a pity. If you always see the benefits of the other party and benefit yourself, you will not stay at a certain level can't be improved?
People who conversations as arguments regardless or not, just want to act as a confroniency, just want to successfully expose to victory. Readers who use this spirit to read the book, the purpose of reading is to find something he can oppose. For those who love argue, they will always find things that argue argue, whether you are willing to argue with him. However, if he realized the true benefits of the conversation lies in learning something, if he realized that it would win knowledge, not to defeat others, he will know that there is no benefit.
Of course, this is not to say that we can't express different views or pointed out the mistakes of others. We just say that you should be as prepared to agree with others.
