Today, I participated in IBM UNIX World's annual speech, and heard some famous manufacturers (SAP, Gold Disc, UF) in the ERP industry, quite emotion. I also saw a lot of differences. ???? A product, whether it is clothing, software, it should emphasize a core competitiveness. So what is the core competitiveness? I think the user's most needed to achieve the product is the core competitiveness of this product. For example, a new medicine is in the world, its advertisement should focus on its efficacy, not how it produces, and it is not its packaging. Because how to produce it doesn't matter, even if you are hand-oriented, as long as your effect is good. This concept can be understood in life, but it is not this in some software companies in China.
Speaking of ERP, to say that it is to see if it is dry, saying that the big old roughness is used for corporate management, and the management effect is good, it is good, it is not good, its core Is it possible to provide good management capabilities, software is not very easy to use, not how it is developed. Domestic software seems to hang technology in the mouth, saying what structure they have adopted, how to advance, one mentioned that there are many kinds of vocabulary, or some of the concept of some mysterious. ??? Let's talk about some of my opinions, I think these are facts, may not be very smooth. 1. A software company, what technology is adopted, this is your personal thing, and there is no relationship with the user. Users only ask you to implement the features he needed. Of course, some functions may be convenient to adopt more advanced technologies, but this is still a software company's own business, and there is no relationship with customers' needs.
2. Software belongs to software, hardware belongs to hardware. Don't put two things together. A lot of companies like to provide a package, obviously in the ire, but the opening closing is what is said to use, what kind of hard disk is used, what is the network structure. I don't know what they are doing. This is like a hospital advocating the elevator in the hospital, how advanced, halo, dizzy, do not know what to say.
3. The management concept is not necessarily the latest, it depends on it. The so-called hypothermia is right. To give an exaggerated example: kill a chicken just a knife. Suddenly one day, one person found that the cannon's killing is bigger than the knife, and she is desperate to kill the chicken. . . . I believe that everyone must treat him as a madman! The company has his own development process, and the management needs to be different in different phases. A huge company, the smoothness and integration of information is required. For a micro company with only two people, don't remember something, what software is, it is hand-made. . . , Tell him what modern management concept is really no time. Similarly, some concepts proposed by large foreign companies are equally applicable to domestic companies, and the scale is not in a magnitude. Specifically to some companies in China, even if there is a problem, such a company will also mention what zero care management, purely pulling! 4. Unless there is nothing to have, the modern Chinese phrase that has become used is unable to accurately express a concept of the company, do not use the phrase. If there is already a word expression, you may think that his synonym "may" will express more clearly, don't do this, because you know that others will be confused. The audience will use huge brain cells to analyze the difference between the two concepts, and finally find that it is not really real when it is a thing. One fact is now there are too many concepts, the company is too much, unless you are Microsoft, IBM, Intel, no one will spend energy to study your "new" concept. Enterprises are generally mature users, only them Familiar things can be bought. This is different from New New People!
??? Listen to SAP's speecation, let's take a personal introduction, then introduce the company, say very simply "SAP only do ERP", then introduce the latest ERP products for SAP. Then, a lot of cases, I can't see a little virtual, and I didn't listen to what software used to develop because they know these is not related to the user. Compared with domestic companies, the statement is a technique that has been used around their software. How many of the top programs have been developed, and there is more blow to what they have achieved. Is it more than the thin point, better than technology, and core technology? Just like the C language understanding, no matter how deep it is also known, people have a good understanding, people provide a platform, we just develop applications, technology comparison on this basis? Finally, I said some virtual concepts, what ERP has long been out of time, what is management now. 40 minutes speech I probably looked at it, the listener below gone 1/3. It is said that this is what I think of the example of selling medicine. "You can't cure the disease, I am using the medicinal medicines for Chinese medicine ..." Domestic management software!
