Now there is a lot of information on how to upgrade to Windows XP SP2, they continue to repeat the necessity of upgrading, such as safe, protected, updated technology, etc., etc., I don't think there is nothing necessary. Upgrade to XP SP2, if the user is a staff member engaged in IT, there is nothing necessary to upgrade.
I most want to say that the latest memory code verification technology belt, I think this will reduce the overall running speed of the system, because each time the new application will perform some necessary code verification work, for more professional I think this is not necessary.
Although SP2 also brings us a few major changes include "Windows Security Center", "POP UP Blocker", "New Windows FireWall", etc., but sometimes not we want. "Windows Security Center" This stuff Even if he feels that he is somewhat, it is well known to Microsoft Anti-Virus products do not work, but it is necessary to do anything inside and virus-related tips. Some are not professional ~, "Pop Up Blocker", even It's not used to it, always feel that the window of the Google toolbar is more useful, "New Windows FireWall", this stuff is more interesting, when you start it, you find it and the interpose machine The other FireWall software conflicts, and only after the other FireWall is completely deleted, some network software can be used normally (such as foxmail, etc.), but I have ZoneAlarm, and there is nothing necessary to install it, and my own firewall also Can be upgraded ~~~
Take a look now ~ What is left now? Wireless Bluetooth can not be used in the desktop, so although even XP does not have memory code verification technology, even the operating system is still very fast, although there is not so much New features, but even Norton Anti-Virus ZoneAlarm Google Tool Bar more professional software can be upgraded at any time can be replaced at any time, so I feel that there is no change in it ~
Oh, the above is purely personal opinion, talk about it ~
