9CBS came along the way, from nothing, slowly, slowly, he has to do more days, but positioning? I opened it, and the fire a few days, destroyed. For a long time, there are many garbage, as described above.
Today, Wiki, wiki is a good thing, but what is the 9CBS used to do? It is not a waste. It is not a waste. Frankly, many people will be a three-minute heat, today poke a few pokes tomorrow, and later, this wiki has become a garbage station, in vain Surf wide bandwidth and server. Come, just catch a page, declare, this is not a matter.
Of course, the things on the home page have been enough Wiki, it is really all, it is encyclopedia. But take a closer look, is it? ? Fox, 牛 牛 牛 · Sheep, desperate cat, Netnew? ? ?
In addition to a 9CBS indicator, this page is 9CBS? Who is it? This page is very font and style, and whether the entire 9CBS is coordinated? Get rid of a slight improvement? Even if I only change a style sheet, don't let me see the webpage of the era of 1997, okay?
The next is blog, you said that everyone is used .Text, why do you get the 9cbs so ugly? See blog.9cbs.net, I want to cry. Difficult, quality, 9CBS gathers how many masters, but compared to Bo Hall, the bloggers are worse, and the two are loose, relying on the participants' consciousness, compared to 9CBS should be advantageous, As long as there is one or two edits, you can roughly control the quality of the article. check it out
Repost? ? ? Is an inappropriate partition released?
Look at this, so many things repeat in so many districts, is the editor?
I can only do myself, I can't go to constrain others, but 9CBS can properly constrain everyone's behavior. Although some people can be enrolled, most people can still understand.
As for the development of .Text blog based on .Text blog, then talk about it, see so much, is there anyone feel uncomfortable? For a typical articles that appear in the article, please do it.
I sincerely hope that 9CBS has become a more professional IT portal, I hope that everyone can truly participate in 9CBS, truly have, think.