My Go is mad (2)
??????? Let's change your Go again. One of my ideas is that if each party can walk two steps, what will be? This also attracted a problem, and each of the two steps of each side is the "first", or "simultaneously"? Its meaning is that if the second step can be taken in the blank point after the first step, otherwise it will not. I found that under these two different premises will develop two very different Go.
??????? Let's take a look, if you are two-step chess, how is it. First of all, in terms of death, each chess is still two-eyed play, because according to our premise, you can't fall in two eyes. But some common shapes still have changed, such as straight four, not live, straight five talents. Fang four originally reserved, but now makes two hands. The board is not alive, in short, the original other party has the place where you have a job, you need to make chess now.
The impact on the robbery is also very big, because everyone will take both hands, so as long as any party is willing, he can immediately rob. Of course, here is to clarify that the basic principle of robbery is "prohibiting global integrity and reproduction", so this is the case:
?
Wheel and white, white can lift the two sons, but the black chess can't immediately connect two sons, can only mention one, and then find a job, so it will not lead to "intersperit". Or black chess can walk around elsewhere, if white must be two hands, the black chess can be reclined, this is the robbery under this rule.
Similarly, the three robbery is no longer a win-negative, see the figure below:
Bai Lian took two hands. But this is very interesting:
Wheel, if Bai Lian raises two robbery, black must also make two hands; but white chess can also choose to take one hand and then take off him. So the conclusion here is that if both parties persist, it is no loss. But the situation of the situation will not choose this, for both parties, here can be said to be a double, but the other party has endless hobby. This shape should belong to the usual "shake robbery".
If you are robbery, you may have a loop without winning, such as the following figure:
When the white walking, the white must even raise two robbery, when the rotation is black, the black is also in the state of being played, so black must also make two robbery, thereby constitute a loop without winning.
In addition, even the effects of two hands on other laws are also very affected. You have to avoid the shape of you will be "playing", because it is "playing", it means that the second hand is taken away. So the monk does not exist.
The above discussion is based on the two steps of each, "Successfully" out, and look at "At the same time", "the" success "and" simultaneously "have no difference, but" simultaneously "walk two steps will be exported An important inference, three "eyes" is active chess! Because you can "simultaneously" fill in the two eyes of the opponent, put chess. With this inference, I think this is more fun than the kind of assumption!
Since it is a three-eyed play, the form of the entire Go has changed. Dirty life, "straight six" is not alive, "straight seven" live. "Board Six", "Board Eight", and even "board ten" are not lived (the change of board ten is complicated, please help me verify, you have to remember, two-step chess is simultaneous, you can't This is important to refer to the blanks left behind the other party.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to follow the rules of the above rules, so I can only do this discussion. Overall feeling is that this chess is more difficult, and the two sides eat more. But each side is walking two steps, it is also a balance. In addition, I mentioned a three-dimensional chessboard in the last article, in which a child can have six mouthfuls. So I feel in this board, every one is only one step, it is very interesting because you are hard to eat. Let us make a calculation of it. On the ordinary board, each child can be tight, so each step can be reduced by 25% of each other. Each side is two steps, the two sons are connected to the up to six gas, each round can be tight, so each step can reduce the altitude of 33%, this value is much larger than ordinary situation, so it is easier to eat. According to the same calculation, three-dimensional chessboard, one step per side, 1% per capita, 20% of each round, 20% per round. So, is it more reasonable to even two steps on this board? Of course, this is an unfounded ratio, everything should be based on practical inspection.
I hope who can practice and talk about your new discovery.
