Current situation
I came back from the evening last night, I saw the introduction of Lei Jun on the Internet. Wake up like a dream!
For a long time, I thought that my future is very beautiful, I can be happy! It is considered to learn knowledge in the university, and other things are just a cumbersome! Of course, such an idea is also punished in many times, but she understands since he read his brief, our time is too limited. What we have to learn is too miscellaneous. Each door is an idea that it is lack of vision.
Lei Jun's first night in his university, go to the self-study class, I also greeted himself: "I am also".
But can I do with the same?
If I can't do it, is it my own reason?
If it is not just my reason, do you have anyone or this school, this society?
Society can be excluded, at least I think the society's attention is far more than what they have returned, but as we see, if the party last night is only the second, we have a chance to create better !
I am very reluctant in a learning environment like us.
The students are too lack of learning enthusiasm, and they have no hunger for learning! This situation is equal to the loss of appetite. Then I have to eat with a classmate who has no appetite, it will make you lose your appetite.
It will be very good at Lei Jun. We certainly don't need to complain. But as we have such an environment, it is difficult to have big, and the personal breakthrough is my previous idea. However, if you have actively guided it very well. There is more beneficial for no classmates. When the Lei Jun was in college, I really like to work in the laboratory. We have a good hardware here, but we will always be issued to a part of a part. I don't think that our environment is difficult to improve this way.
For yourself, the Lei Jun is a good example. His learning attitude and method admire. In the university, we should learn to give up, and why we will give up. In fact, I will give up, if I have a college, if I have a test, it is equal to killing me. Sometimes I pay too much attention, our school is mostly the case. The school's scholarship did not say that you have a good job in that way. I think this kind of school choice will only make some knowledge and don't understand.
It's really hard to do: "Let's put down" words. We need support! The whole value of our entire value has been distorted, such as the scholarship evaluation of the previous school year, there are some classmates to compete with the teacher, it is really unbearable! !
Especially for us, we have to spend more time in hand. The group is a good start, but she lacks flexibility, and initiative, she disposable "space" limited. The Lei Jun returned, he has 3 laboratory keys. He very much attention to hands. I have to do this. We should do this. Theoretical learning spent too much time, I think it is right!
In a big social environment in our so, we should have a better opportunity! And many good students, their goals are not a postgraduate study, of course, I have also planned yourself! (Although I don't think it is a good student)
Now, this is a kind of self-value definiteness: you need to make others feel yourself with a diploma, or oskil. Lei Jun did not do it.
I don't appreciate Li Yanhong, I think we are trying to do better. As long as we have the opportunity, we can succeed. Just like a Lei Jun.
But we have a very bad tendency here. When someone says we have no research, we can always ask our opposition. However, we also have to realize that our project is more: website. I think the website is not much more helpful to develop with our classmates.
For China's software industry, there has not been experienced society, so there is no idea. I don't know if this is a kind of madness or my own. But it is also strange. As I am like this, it should not be a few. It is a college student that should be striking or guided, so you don't know! However, we can still get a little information from some places. In every lecture, if you manage a lecture, there will be many students from all major, if the technical class is very likely to sit dissatisfaction, do you have a future manager.
This is a mistake! I'm sure!
I agree with the admiring of management, but it is a blind follower. Our society needs a variety of talents, this is a fact. Of course, whoever thinks only to do management class. But what I want to say is that I have forgotten this now, I am too early!
As everyone knows, the real manager has a lot of technical pointers! If you give me rights, undergraduate does not have a course of management. We have to have more time to learn technology. Management is for practice.
The host last night said when China had a Bill.gates. I am thinking, is this necessary? Is the software industry going to make some people get rich? This is not China.
Moreover, there are not a few good things in China. Does our goal show BILL? I think this goal is unrealistic, if it appears, it may be deformed. What we want is the power of national software industry, not to get some people. I think the emergence of the Software Institute is a very good reform. At least it emphasizes the market and needs (this is Dr. Ma SF).
We need to develop the foundation! !
There may be more complaints above, but I don't think that this can at least explain the dissatisfaction of the status quo.
For the status quo of China software, it is basically from the teacher from the network and next to the side, and there is basically no idea.
