Terrible is that professors are telling dialectics.
"Please judge this ass," Professor said, "Is it good or bad?"
I have to say: "No."
"Wrong," Professor said, "Anything has contradictory, there is a bad side, there is definitely a good side
. "
"So say it is right?" I asked.
"Of course." Professor said.
"It is not good."
"Wrong. You only see the contradictions on the side of the struggle, did not see the unity of unity."
I have to look at this serious problem carefully, think about it carefully: "This fart is not good, but bad one
The surface is the main, in the dominant position. "
"Wrong. You are a problem with you. Contradictions will conversion each other, today is in the dominant position
It must be in the secondary status tomorrow. "
"Do you mean that the whole human beings will cheer for my fart?"
"Don't do this, but you can't deny this development trend"
I have been a big one, I have to say hard my scalp: "My fart is not good, I am not good. Today
Not good, will be fine tomorrow. It may be good today, and I will not be good tomorrow. "
The professor heard his head and said, "This is a thorough skepticism, not the dialectic point of view."
In this way, just because I put a fart, I became a skeptic.
Professor then lectures: "The power of dialectics is not only to refute any views easily, but he can
Easily find the theoretical basis for any point of view. "
"But I don't have any basis for my fart." I protest.
"That's because you didn't find it. It is actually very simple. It is an inevitable result of the contradiction between the contradictions in your belly.
"
My dumb is speechless.
Professor said: "Let's don't talk about the fart, talk about a more complicated question: a watermelon, a sesame, no matter how you
The sample is selected, there is a theoretical basis. "
I quickly said, "I want to pick up watermelon and lose sesame."
"Very good." Professor said, "You have seized the main contradictions, that is, you seize the key to solving the problem."
"Then I will pick up sesame, lose watermelon."
"The first has a change to achieve the quality change. You solve the problem of the problem is very correct."
"I have to be watermelon and I have to be sesame."
"That is to grasp the main contradictions, and you will not let go of the secondary contradiction. You are seeing a problem with a comprehensive look."
"I have to smash watermelon and step on sesame seed."
"Very good, you are seeing problems with development. New things are negative for old things. Everything is inevitable
Destroy. The death of old things is the premise of new things. "
"I have to eat watermelon, and I have to smash watermelon. I have to pick up sesame, and I have to step on sesame. However, there is only one
Western melon, one sesame, what should I do? "
"You can't pay the dialectical approach, it is important that the contradictions are not only opposite, but also have a unified side.
. You eat watermelon, of course, it has its reasonable side, but you have to smash watermelon, and it is not unreasonable. Only two
Unity can enter a higher level of struggle. "
I opened my mouth, stunned: "However, you didn't solve my problem."
Professor smiled and said: "The dialectic does not solve any problem, its use is to first turn people into fools - if still
Someone is not a fool. "
"Do you say 'first'?" I asked.
"Yes, then jump from the reversal to the scholar." The professor began to organize the lectures, "about why not understand the dialectics
Deciding questions, how to turn people into fools, and how to achieve the leap from fools to scholars, this is the next class
content. "
Professor, I jumped and walked out of the classroom.
Second Class: Professor: "Let's talk about the use of dialectics. We have to give a more complex example: How to think
Chinese traditional culture? "
I said: "That must use the dialectical point of view."
"Yes. We have many big-name dialectics, they will make full use of the three laws of dialectics, theoretical connection
In the actual, the bypass is from the booth. The pen is thousands of words, tight around the body. Finally, give you a conclusion:
Its essence, go to it - do you admire? "
"Yeah. Is the dialectic not very useful?"
"I used to think so until I met a wild dog of a funeral - it changed my opinion."
"Wild dog?" I inexplicably.
"Yes. There is a garbage pile after my home, one day has come to a wild dog. It doesn't look at other things.
Look, '哧 哧' a bit, bit a bone. "
"This is not surprising, all the dogs will be like this." I said.
"Yes. The problem is for the dog, this bone is 'essence', except for bones in the garbage pile,
Brick head, iron block, broken bucket, etc., why should he ask this essence? How do he know that takes a fine?
Hua, go to it? Is it possible to fully understand the discussion of large-scale scholars? "
"It seems that it will not."
"It is definitely not, so the big scholars have passed the exquisite conclusions through precise discussion, in fact, even one mourning
The home of the wild dog will know early. In this case, why should we cheer for them, worship them?
? "
"Yeah, why?"
"The only explanation is that the dialectics have successfully turned you into a fool."
"I understand."
"You understand, you must ask: You are useless. Take your essence, you know anyone. The question is what is
Jinghua, what is a mess. "
"Yes, see what he said."
"It's hard to fall, he will make full use of the three major laws of dialectics, theory contacts actual, the next signing, cross
捭 捭. The pen is thousands of words, tight around the body. Finally, give you a conclusion: specific problems, specific analysis. clever
Not high? "
"It makes sense."
"But I think: This is not only boring, useless, is nearly rogue."
"What is this?"
"Is there a specific problem, abstract analysis? The world's wild dog came to the garbage pile,
Is it like Aristotle, first divide all the things, to make the connotation and extension, and then return
In the case of the first, I finally determined whether it is eating brick or eating a bone? is it possible? "
"It's impossible. If you have a brick, you can eat bricks."
"Yes, scorpion can be taught. No one will 'specific questions, abstract analysis', 'specific questions, specific analysis' this sentence
The words are equal to not saying. However, dialectical practitioners like to use abstract methods to analyze specific questions. Because of dialectics
The law is the universal truth that is in the four sea. So if you see a dog who eats bricks, you can't see you.
It may be a famous scholar. "
The professor also packed the lectures and said: "The fundamental of the dialectics is the use of 'comprehensive, development, contacts"
See the question. Like all lies, this sounds very realistic. The origin of the dialectics of the next class,
And it is the relationship between school. "
Third class lesson
"So far, human beings use three methods to study this world." Professor is not polite, single knife direct, "first
Is 'butfler', most scientists are this way. They analyzed the world's minor parts. The study of biological does not study all organisms, some study only animals; research animals are not research
Animals, there is only a mammal; study mammals, some only study the monkey; study the monkey
Only study the tail of the monkey. They only see trees in their eyes, and they don't see the forest. It is an extremely view of view. "
"Not a dialectic point of view." I said.
"Yes," professor will then say, "Not only that, they try to cut research objects with other things, in
Try not to interfere, see what he is like. Scientists spend a lot of money construction laboratory
And don't do experiments on the street, the main reason is here. Now some experiments have to get in space,
Even the air gravity is subject to absolute, visible, in order to cut the relationship between things, these scientists are unscrupulous.
. "
I said: "Contrary to the view of the dialectics."
"It's right, but still more than this, they still don't care about a monkey, how is it, only taking it?
Knife slaughtered, see what it is in its stomach. They use a thorough standing point. "
"Very brutal, and very awkward." I said.
"So I called it 'Butcher'. But this is the foundation and source of all of our scientific knowledge. No one
There is no science. They should be respectful - their personality, talent and them
The method should be respectful. "
"Who doesn't respect them?"
"There are a lot, you may be one."
"how do I say this?"
"They use isolated, stationary, one-sided way, this method has a name, your secondary school teacher taught you
Yes? "
"Calling and going to school, but it is a derogatory term?"
"Yes, I am called, I am going to school, this is the past scientists, now most scientists used methods.
"
"Why is it a derogatory term?"
"Because it is incompatible with the dialectics, and it is relatively tied. Some people not only think it is correct, but also
Others are wrong. Surprisingly, the dialectics tell about the unity of the whole day, and the dialectical is coming and dialectics.
He refused to be the same, but the attitude of killing a stick in the same way. "
"I understand."
"It is also a scientist using the second method, I call it 'robber', this scientist is more important.
They don't do anything, and scientists who have equal shape and go to school have studied more exact results. Based on this basis.
China. Thousands of scientists studied thousands of animals, plants, and microorganisms, Darwin took one
Comprehensive, evolution is presented. "
"This is very easy."
"It is not easy at all, and you need a higher intelligence and a broader vision. Einstein is the most
One of the colors. His vision is very open, and even studied dialectics. But he said dialectics did not study his research.
Have any help. "
"What is the dialectic?"
"The third method of studying the world is the method of dialectics, I call it a method of 'God's".
That is, the content of our next lesson. "
Last lesson
"I was opened," the professor said, "The last lesson today. Please ask."
I said: "Some students say your point of view is a bit among you."
"He is right, I am not only extreme, but there is a mistake. I deliberately set a common sense wrong.
But it is not to give me. Now I have to teach you the most important thing: no one is
All is correct, up to just part. If the world is the elephant, we are the blog of the group. We want to know the look of elephants, but we can't finish this elephant. all I have
If the blind is adding together, it is not possible. If your life can only touch the tail of the elephant, you must take care of it.
If you are confident that you fully understand this tail, you must insist on your own point of view.
Don't listen to others say that elephants are like a pillar or like a fan, it will easily change your point of view. Bode is not terrible, terrible
It is the wind that is rain, there is no otter. If you insist, there is nothing big, it must be more
Smart blinds give you a mistake. Science is this to extract a truth in thousands of errors.
. But if you are right, you didn't persist, the world lost an opportunity to advance.
"In addition, you have to remember: no matter what you are right, you just understand the small part of the elephant. Listen to not
How is it saying? Can't believe, you can't believe it. Don't choose, only use your rationality, it may have
More deficiencies, but it is the only thing you can trust. A person's rationality is very limited, but the rationality of many people
The power is huge. If you don't know how many people are rationality, then I tell you - that is science. Department
Learning is not enough, I must be broken in the future. But then you need a lot of people smarter than Erinstein, Ken
Not you me.
"Rational, criticism, and tolerance are the most important thing I said."
I didn't ask questions this time, and there is no other person.
"The words returned to Zheng Chuan, continue to talk about the dialectics." Professor had to say, "dialectics is also a blind man, but he
Do not touch. "
"Don't he want to know the elephant?" I asked.
"Of course, he wants to understand the elephant, but he thinks that it is not used, or it doesn't matter. He thinks an elephant is everywhere.
Running, it is still growing from small, and the forest, earth, and even the solar system around him, the Milky Way
Unlimited contact, use 'isolated, stationary, one-sided' to go to school, in vain, only use 'full
The dialectics of the face, development, and joint "can figure out the elephant. "
"But there is nothing to touch, how to fully, develop, contact?"
"I don't know, I don't know, only God know. So I called it a method of 'God's style'. Dialectical
The first in China is popular in China, Fuxi gossip, yin and yang five elements, Confucius's "Overcoming", Laozi's "counter
"The" Easy "" Yin Yin Yushu "," Yellow Emperor's Internal Classics "" Internal and External Time, Evil Can't invade
Union is a prolonged law. Only Aristotle proposed the prototype of dialectics, neither, not specific.
Engels said he expounded the basic principle of dialectics, I don't know where to say. But this is not a need, modern
The dialectics in the sense is starting with Black Gal, this point Engels and me, and anyone else will
Have any opinions. "
"You just say Engels, why don't you mention Marx?"
"Marx and dialectical relationship are not big."
"Dialectical materialism is not the soul of Marxism?"
"I don't agree with this point of view, Marx has written a" sacred family "and painful" pan-logic "
", Pan-logistic theory includes dialectics. I have never seen him in the future. Detailed to his most late philosophy.
In the Second Edition of Capital, he joked himself to the dialectics. But what is the dialectics?
Marx has never an answer. "
"So how do dialectics enter Marxism?"
"It is completely Engels, from" anti-Durin "to" Nature Dialectics "that Engels who did not want to publish, the dialectical talent became the so-called soul of Marxism. This is the same as the advice, Marx is not
Agree to 'dialectical materialism' this statement. This is entirely the needs of future generations. But "anti-Du Lin" is
I am agreed by Marx, this is the fact. "
"What are the dialectics?"
"First of all, three laws: first, quality intervals, from Hegel" Logic "first" presence "
. Second, the contradiction is unified, from "Logic" second "nature". Third, negative negation
Law, from "Logic" third "concept". This is the surface, that is, Marx said.
"Mysterious profile". It is worth seeing problems with comprehensive, development, contact. Its essence is hidden
Then the two majorities: First, the truth. Multivariate and relativeism against truth. This has already become
Historical garbage. Second, the truth is not divided, the truth of local affairs is part of the overall world, isolated
The study found these truths. Only in the forest is looking for trees, it is not possible to start researching the forest from the trees. This is not only
Extremely absurd, and unrealistic. "
"Why is not realistic?"
"There is a western unbeaten professor very well: the facts are fully proven, isolated, stationary, one-sided to study things
The method of understanding the situation in human existing understanding is the best way to understand the essence of things. because
If the contact between things is thousands, if all the associations are considered, it is equal to anything.
Just like our old ancestors, I can only hold a "Taiji two instruments, two instruments," this thinking lazy
Symbolic days. Wait until the various characteristics and laws of things have more detailed grasp, put it in the system.
Conduct very cautious observations and research. And Chinese traditional thinking is always a big fat man, open
Starting from the overall view of the nature. This tradition with the characteristics of the original thinking is unable to meet
, Or dialectics is only a modern representation of ancient Chinese ideological methods. The Chinese never lacks this kind of thinking.
Invitably, it is necessary to make up the class is isolated, stationary, one-sided to study the icon. "
"How did the dialectic come?"
"How did your middle school textbooks say?"
"It seems to be a comprehensive and correct summary of objective world, human society and the law of thinking."
"This kind of saying is extremely absurd, and it is completely in any fact. It is a thorough mistake. First, don't say black
When you live, it is in the 21st century, human beings just understand the objective world, very small
a little. I only know half a point to human society. It is not possible to understand the laws of thinking. One elephant we just
Understand a few joints on the tail, a few hair on the legs, plus a piece of skin on the ear, talk about what full
Summary, correct summing? It's purely a dream.
"Second, you can take a look at" Marx Engerator Collection "Volume 3 469, 12th line to Chapter 14:
"There is a dialectical outline in Hegel's work, although it is from a completely wrong starting point.
Look. "Engels said in less than 20 places, this error starting point is idealism. Who
They all know that Engels called the dialectics from Hegel's "Logic", as he said
However, "crushed the shell of Black Galdene," took his "rational kernel" of his dialectics. You
Do you believe? Humans have to go to the detour from the departure point. And an empire called Hegel
Professor, but from a wrong starting point, "comprehensive, correctly" summarizes the objective world, human society, and the correct laws of thinking. Is this what people say?
"I will never believe. Just then tied me to the hot criminal column of the new context, baked me before bakeing for two hours, I
Still don't believe! "
"I don't believe it." I whispered.
"But believes quite a few people. Since the shackles of Christianity, dialectics is the biggest in the road of scientific development.
Obstacles. He prepared modern science to go to school, mechanical theory. Make science stagnates some places
before. In the 1920s, a dean of the former Soviet Academy, because of the hybrid improvement of crops
The head was lost. "
"What is it?"
"Because hybrid improvement is based on Mendel Moore theory, with dialectical Gegene."
"Are you very familiar with the former Soviet Union?"
"I am most familiar is China, I have lived here for decades. But it is easier to play the flies on others."
I asked: "How is the science against the discrimination of dialectics?"
"Western philosophy uses exclusiveism, logical experience, the modern science is not the sound.
It is only constantly developing, producing more food, steel, machine, and human except for the spiritual needs.
When this has become an irreversible trend, the dialectic suddenly found that although it is in other people, shameful
It is himself. "
"Dialectic does not have anything else?"
"Some people say that dialectics is a premature freak, although the current stage of human understanding is not applicable, but his whole
The point of view is really attractive. The overall theory of modern science, the organicism has begun to take shape. But this is not dialectical
The return of the law, but in the development of the scientific self, if there are some principles that are now outlined. Truth one yuan
After all, it is unacceptable. Scientific never let go of any development possibilities, even the most hopes, also
Some people will pay a hundred times effort. In 1984, a large group of scientific masters founded Shengfa in the United States.
Santa Fe Institute, they include many way to win, is the field of science
The top figures, the big board of money is also known as Hech - Financial Killer Solos. Their goal is to study
The likelihood of "a diverse theory". When they don't believe what dialectics, don't study "
One elementation. They use modern scientific way to explore the general original for control complex adaptation system (CAS)
. Although I don't believe they will get any results, but this is one of the most daring attempts in the history of human science.
I wish them success - even though it will break all my ideas. "
-
