Professor Li Xingjian talks about idiom regulations If the more than-time thing is to use "tomorrow Huanghua", or use "Yesterday Yellow Flower"? "July flowing fire" refers to the sky is cold? Still nothing to do? Idioms were treated as treasures in national language, and there were hundreds of idioms in my country. In people's language practice, the situation in which the idiom is used is, and more worrying is that some idioms' correct usage and wrong usage are very small, so that many people use mistakes. A few more advertisements have changed to the symphomy, and the phenomenon of irregularity in idioms has raised the role. In response to this situation, Professor Li Xingjian, member of the National Silicone Committee, led a group of experts and scholars to edit a "modern Chinese idiom dictionary". This is a dictionary that corrects the error usage and establishing the correct example. Under Qiuyang, Professor Li Xijian came to some problems in the process of study, and fascinating. · Idioms have a chaos. Li Xingjian said that we can notify many of the differences in idioms. This shows that the norms of idioms in modern Chinese are already a reality issue that cannot be ignored. For example, "Ye Gong Ye Long", "Ante Car", "怙 当", etc., there is a problem that is easy to read; "高 骛" is "好 骛" or "鹜", "inexplicable" It is "name" or "Ming", and often has different phenomena. The symmetry of idioms is more complicated. The most typical example is more semantically changed by "hole wind". Some of the various dictionaries explained it as a basis, there is a cause; some say that it is to indicate that Ziwu has, no basis; some dictionary simply explains the two opposite interpretation. The "Modern Chinese Idiom Dictionary" editorial group used the example of using this idiom for more than ten years, and found that the "hole wind" said that "there is a cause" has not been encountered, so the editor decided to take only "no basis" "This kind of question. Li Xingjian said that if the usage of these confusion is not standardized, it will have a great difficulty to communicate with each other. And everyone is now unfair to pay attention to this issue. For example, someone else often uses the "not satisfactory" as a language. In fact, in the two statements of "as as people", "don't have any satisfactory", "all" is the meaning of "complete"; "If" is the verb, it means "conformity". There is no doubt that "if" in "If you are not satisfactory" can't be lost, otherwise the sentence will not pass by lack of verbs. Li Xingjian also took a newspaper, and the article above said: The reporter reported that all color TV companies have followed them after Changhong's price cuts, and the comments were convinced, and the comments were convinced that this price reduction promoted the company's winning fitting.. This actually uses the wrong idiom. Because the previous price cuts is not there, it is not "servant". Therefore, in this special context, you should use "go back". · There are a lot of idiom error correction methods. How to regulate idioms? Li Xingjian said, according to the different situations in the current idiom, experts put forward different processing methods: The first is to clearly propose "pair" or "wrong". Many issues in idioms are because people used by people understand the idioms, or the meaning of the words, and cause misuse. For example, put "painting the floor is a prison", writing "according to the class", "pressing the class", understanding the "difference" to understand the willingness of the subjective, put "10,000 people empty alley" into everyone, don't go out For "July Fire Fire" is used as summer hot, it is difficult to heat. For examples of these misuse, you need to indicate the correct usage help correction. Li Xingjian also has a detailed explanation of "Tomorrow Huanghua": this idiom originally written by Su Shi's Chongyang Festival, "Meeting without busy, tomorrow Huanghua Butterfly" Today's meetings. The "tomorrow" here is the "today" of relatively writing poetry. Later, "Ming Yellow Flowers" refers to the scope of the scope, with it to compare the excessive things.
