The discussion about ERP can be said to be a container, it is really a bit of appearance, and the popular argument is not necessarily correct. We should still calm, avoid going into some misunderstandings, some views of this article may be worth your reference. Why do some companies do not dare to go to ERP to hear two statements in the country: Enterprise management is good, you must help it by ERP; enterprise erp does not go, because of management is not good. From the perspective, these two sentences have some truth, but they are placed, and they immediately show the contradiction between application ERP ideas. This is better than someone says "You are not running, you will buy a car to open; if you don't drive, because you are not running." Is this not too strange? As a leader of the company, we will have doubts about ERP under the facial contradictory statement. In fact, in most cases, enterprise management is not "good", but "can not" consideration. This is the same as "if you don't drive, you will be unhappy". Not well managed, more refers to the quality of "decision making" is not good; in the transaction section, it is possible to directly seek ERP assistance, ERP can bring labor, correct, timely automation, and so on. Enterprises need ERP assistance to reduce the cost of information processing, and its success or failure is not directly related to the level of management. As a result, companies must be assisted by ERP, so-called "management is not good, I can't go." Is an error-friendly view that is too rough for management. Do you have to do BPR before implementing ERP? There are some people who advocate: don't go on ERP, because you don't do "business process remangle (BPR: Business process rengineering", this is an error in the BPR and ERP relationship thought. This is better than someone who wants to improve his hand wash the process (enterprise process), hoping to save more effort (cost of enterprises), the clothes are washed faster (corporate transaction efficiency) and more clean Therefore, he went to buy a washing machine (enterprise to buy ERP system), but before learning to use this washing machine (before entering the ERP), let him complete him to wash clothes on the laundry board, and Try to improve (enterprise to do BPR), otherwise this washing machine can not be used (businesses can't go up to ERP)? Of course this is absurd! BPR ignores the importance of content in the top of the foreflow, and its revolutionary approach (by zero-re-design process) and ignoring human factors bring huge scourge that have brought fierce criticism in foreign countries. It has achieved part of the part of the achievement, in fact, it can be done with the use of ERP systems and overall optimization. However, BPR has a poor and unreal technology, but there is one of the trends of death, and is extensively promoted to the implementation of ERP, which is very strange. After retiring 10,000 steps, even if the company should do BPR, management of the administrative analysis and foreign empirical experience pointed out: ERP can help companies do BPR, how can it be used to use BPR to cooperate out ERP? Before implementing ERP, must first do demand research? Many years ago, there are people who advocate: Before the informationization, we must first take the internal needs of the enterprise. Do this. right? If a person will not drive, don't take other people's car, will you know what kind of car you want? Can you tell the configuration and specifications of the car you want? A person who has never used a washing machine, can you ask what to buy a washing machine? Tools will change the practice, and knowledge cannot be replaced with experience. Therefore, the traditional practice of demand research is wrong.
Otherwise, why did these methods do not help companies succeed in ERP? First of all, it is training! The ERP project can be started by the transaction management, that is, avoiding the problem of decision management. We have said that the transaction partial ERP has been able to produce great benefits; after trading and data management, it can reach the ability of decision management again by ERP. The order of "first trading, post decisions" is the same as our learning, first learn the skills of driving a car (like enterprises to deal with trading), then consider further problems such as route and driving time (like enterprise upgrading decision) quality). Therefore, it is directly on the ERP, do not pull the problem of decision-making, and add trouble! ERP thinking is suitable for China's national conditions? China has a similar inference in the early 1990s: 1/3 of the MRPI IT system cannot be used, 1/3 is available, 1/3 should be modified. There are also many people who have recently claimed that Chinese companies have their own characteristics without the thinking of ERP. Nowadays, I am very popular with "Impathetic Tree" to compare the company information system: management as our body style, buy a generally applicable ERP system is like buying a clothing to wear, if you don't fit, you can get it, and this Modifying to ERP is secondary development, or called customization. Wearing clothes is subject to body type, and clothes should be modified to match the body. On the contrary in corporate management, you have to buy an ERP system with high thinking, rigorous, verify effective, and internal management practices do not appear, to change management, rather than modifying the ERP system. If you want to take clothes to make a metaphor, you should buy a suit made of steel plates. According to standard body type, if you find where you don't fit, you will move to adjust the body, until you wear it, and body Also change the standard. So what is called secondary development? The management says "There is no standard," is there, and the second development is based on what standards? Only the existing in the enterprise is existing, less standard management, how can the result? China's special national conditions are manifested in business faces, market faces, industry development facials, or people's subject matter inside, without the need to express transactions and decisions in internal management. The special ERP demand triggered by business habits is foreseeable or prior verification. What special difficulties will there be? "Happy family has only one kind, unhappy family has their own misfortune." The truth of ERP is the same. Conclusion China's speed and achievement of economic development in recent years, and worldwide attention. However, during a short period of high-speed development, the results of IT and management technologies in advanced countries have been highly compressed, and a brain plug in, the most advanced and very backward concepts coexist, it will inevitably Generate so many management ideas that do not match and confuse. However, the entrepreneurs who are chaotic, and the entrepreneurs who are brave in information and improvement, so that we can use their experience to seek more correct practices. Today, the efficiency and management advantages of informationization have not been ignored and delayed. I hope the reader can borrow this paper, establish the correct ERP idea and ensure the success of ERP. When should I start to act on ERP? yesterday! **************************************************************************************************************************** (Super Baby: Reading this article, feeling a lot, some views on the original author and the propensity method, very disadvantage It can be said that it is an overwhelming place. It is really a thing that people look at, and the popular arguments are not necessarily correct. We should still calm, avoid going into some misunderstandings, some views of this article may be worth your reference.
Why do some companies do not dare to go to ERP to hear two statements in the country: Enterprise management is good, you must help it by ERP; enterprise erp does not go, because of management is not good. From the perspective, these two sentences have some truth, but they are placed, and they immediately show the contradiction between application ERP ideas. This is better than someone says "You are not running, you will buy a car to open; if you don't drive, because you are not running." Is this not too strange? (This class is better than the first thing, "Enterprise Management is good" is a monopoly statement, indicating a willingness to a will; "running is not fast" is a morphous statement, indicating a state. The original sentence means management The level should be improved, you need to be ERP to help, not the manner, it is necessary to use ERP. This is clearly different: "Management level should be improved", there is such a need for enterprises, and at least the management has a certain level, And getting it, it is better; the management level is not good, it is not that the Gener is not reached. Domestic enterprises generally do not meet the standard standard. For the implementation of ERP, it is required for the object of implementation. Goodbye education, People with university levels or at least high school levels are accepted, feasible or basically feasible, and the result can improve the knowledge level of this person; if it is accepted by people with only junior high school, the result is often cost time and no harvest And also manufacturing pain. Therefore, it is possible to conclude that the management level does not meet the standards of the standard enterprise does not have the implementation of ERP, as a leader of the company, is facing such a contradictory statement, of course, will have doubts about ERP . In fact, in most cases, enterprise management is not "good", but "can not" consideration. This is the same as "if you don't drive, you will be unhappy". Not well managed, more refers to the quality of "decision making" is not good; in the transaction section, it is possible to directly seek ERP assistance, ERP can bring labor, correct, timely automation, and so on. Enterprises need ERP assistance to reduce the cost of information processing, and its success or failure is not directly related to the level of management. ("Decision" is one, the method of specific operation is also extremely important. In addition to the "old" wisdom, it is necessary to have a good organizational architecture and a good business process. The operation of the company is not a single relying on "old" "One person is done) Therefore, the company must absolutely need ERP assistance. The so-called" management is not good, but can not go to ERP "is an error-friendly view of the management understanding too rough. Do you have to do BPR before implementing ERP? There are some people who advocate: don't go on ERP, because you don't do "business process remangle (BPR: Business process rengineering", this is an error in the BPR and ERP relationship thought. This is better than someone who wants to improve his hand wash the process (enterprise process), hoping to save more effort (cost of enterprises), the clothes are washed faster (corporate transaction efficiency) and more clean Therefore, he went to buy a washing machine (enterprise to buy ERP system), but before learning to use this washing machine (before entering the ERP), let him complete him to wash clothes on the laundry board, and Try to improve (enterprise to do BPR), otherwise this washing machine can not be used (businesses can't go up to ERP)? Of course this is absurd! BPR ignores the importance of content in the top of the foreflow, and its revolutionary approach (by zero-re-design process) and ignoring human factors bring huge scourge that have brought fierce criticism in foreign countries. It has achieved part of the part of the achievement, in fact, it can be done with the use of ERP systems and overall optimization.
However, BPR has a poor and unreal technology, but there is one of the trends of death, and is extensively promoted to the implementation of ERP, which is very strange. After retiring 10,000 steps, even if the company should do BPR, management of the administrative analysis and foreign empirical experience pointed out: ERP can help companies do BPR, how can it be used to use BPR to cooperate out ERP? (The management level of domestic enterprises is usually not reached by the standard; there is no condition for implementing ERP. If this is implemented, it is like a course called the first middle school students directly to college or graduate students, can it be?? The most indeed method is to make the backward student to the lack of knowledge. Part. BPR is a process that can scientify and standardize the original Chinese enterprises in the original intensity, chaos, disorderly organizational structure, business processes. It is also the process of our supplementation.) Before implementing ERP, must first do demand research? Many years ago: Before informationization, we must first develop the needs of the company, and work well with the overall information system; there are many Enterprises asked Professor of school to help do this. right? If a person will not drive, don't take other people's car, will you know what kind of car you want? Can you tell the configuration and specifications of the car you want? A person who has never used a washing machine, can you ask what to buy a washing machine? Tools will change the practice, and knowledge cannot be replaced with experience. Therefore, the traditional practice of demand research is wrong. Otherwise, why did these methods do not help companies succeed in ERP? First of all, it is training! The ERP project can be started by the transaction management, that is, avoiding the problem of decision management. We have said that the transaction partial ERP has been able to produce great benefits; after trading and data management, it can reach the ability of decision management again by ERP. The order of "first trading, post decisions" is the same as our learning, first learn the skills of driving a car (like enterprises to deal with trading), then consider further problems such as route and driving time (like enterprise upgrading decision) quality). Therefore, it is directly on the ERP, do not pull the problem of decision-making, and add trouble! (What is the name of ERP? "Enterprise Resource Plan" is also. Why is it "planned"? Make it more scientific, more and orderly, operate more efficient. Therefore: Implementing the process of ERP is to adjust, optimize enterprise resources. Go to the process of cheating. Sun Zi: "Know yourself know each other, no war" Other people, will you know what kind of car you want to buy? Can you tell the configuration and specifications of the car? A person who has never used the washing machine, can you ask what to buy a washing machine? "This is indeed a kind, the customer is not all IT professional, and the communication between the two sides is obstacles. And the enterprises have basically not forming a reasonable" enterprise operation model ", so in some cases, the customer is basically a demand. It is not very clear. So for such cases, in the development, implementation, Spuper Baby has a relatively possible way: prototype - gives customers an existing system (although this system is not very perfect. It is not perfect. ), Church customers use this stuff, and then communicate with customers in such a platform. Examples have proven that the "Prototyping" has a great role in the demand acquisition of large complex system development.) ERP ideas China's national conditions? China has a similar inference in the early 1990s: 1/3 of the MRPII system cannot be used, 1/3 is available, 1/3 should be modified. There are also many people who have recently claimed that Chinese companies have their own characteristics without the thinking of ERP.
Nowadays, I am very popular with "Impathetic Tree" to compare the company information system: management as our body style, buy a generally applicable ERP system is like buying a clothing to wear, if you don't fit, you can get it, and this Modifying to ERP is secondary development, or called customization. Wearing clothes is subject to body type, and clothes should be modified to match the body. On the contrary in corporate management, you have to buy an ERP system with high thinking, rigorous, verify effective, and internal management practices do not appear, to change management, rather than modifying the ERP system. If you want to take clothes to make a metaphor, you should buy a suit made of steel plates. According to standard body type, if you find where you don't fit, you will move to adjust the body, until you wear it, and body Also change the standard. So what is called secondary development? The management says "There is no standard," is there, and the second development is based on what standards? Only the existing in the enterprise is existing, less standard management, how can the result? China's special national conditions are manifested in business faces, market faces, industry development facials, or people's subject matter inside, without the need to express transactions and decisions in internal management. The special ERP demand triggered by business habits is foreseeable or prior verification. What special difficulties will there be? "Happy family has only one kind, unhappy family has their own misfortune." The truth of ERP is the same. (Change, it is really painful, said big, it is also called "revolution", it is to "leather" "life". But "leather life" may die early, not "revolution" must wait for death. Everyone weighs itself, use ERP, implementing ERP, is a "two-way match" process. There must be a method of working hard but unseasonless unreasonable ways, this so-called "Salt is a sauce". There are some suitable high-efficiency but do not conform to foreigners' habits. This is our true "feature", it is necessary to develop secondary development to suit the need.) Conclusion The speed of economic development in recent years in recent years Achievements, attractive attention. However, during a short period of high-speed development, the results of IT and management technologies in advanced countries have been highly compressed, and a brain plug in, the most advanced and very backward concepts coexist, it will inevitably Generate so many management ideas that do not match and confuse. However, the entrepreneurs who are chaotic, and the entrepreneurs who are brave in information and improvement, so that we can use their experience to seek more correct practices. Today, the efficiency and management advantages of informationization have not been ignored and delayed. I hope the reader can borrow this paper, establish the correct ERP idea and ensure the success of ERP. When should I start to act on ERP? yesterday! *************************************************Correct Your point of view, I also want to mention my own opinions. Now the domestic enterprises, can not use the measured body, to metaphor, now many implementation companies in China, all through secondary development, to meet the needs of customers, personal feelings Is not right, go up ERP to last a mature ERP software, so that the company does not meet the process of ERP, to achieve optimization, rather than let the unreasonable process, through secondary development, to adapt to the company.
