Xu Jing 2004-7-21
For a while, I want to talk. Talk about some technical articles on the network. There are such a variety of technical articles on the Internet (author points)
Reference book (typical representative: msdn), using a typical "segment storage structure", can be divided into formula segments, parameters, non-professional :) Non-professionals can't understand. Technical Specifications: Generally, it will make an explanation from beginning to end from beginning to end. Technical comment class, including reading notes.
---- Good article requires a lot, I want to emphasize two points. First, it is easy to understand, and the second is not much nonsense. An article can be divided into useful information and useless information, and useful information can be divided into interference information and practical information. The interference information is correct, but people can't understand and even misunderstand. The books of the reference book will not be easy to understand, unless you are very professional, you will feel very well. It is not within the discussion of this article. ---- I saw a lot of high-person technical articles, and I am very popular in some profound principles. I can't understand it before, I can understand it. It is easy to understand that it is easy to understand. Its core problem is not in a brush method, but is a relatively thorough understanding of the object of the discussed, and then it can be discounted. Light is a saying of techniques, not in some nonsense. There are a lot of nonsense on the Internet, and I am really a headache, I don't know how to be cloud. Excerpted a section for everyone to enjoy:
I chose to carry spiritual, faith, soul thought, desire, quirks, evil, fox odor they are parasitic in my body home. I have to treat every guest equally --------- Yisa: "Principle" My name is Cash, so I am very utilitarian; my star image is Leo, so I am a big man; my language is C #, so I have something to take. / * You can see it, this is not a regular technical article, so if you accidentally read a love story, you should not be strange. There are many people to express love, I can see Money, there are girl, there are some sex, but I didn't find love, I always believe that there is a power in this world directly from love, now still Believe. * / C # (Read as C Sharp), is a new (?) For .NET design, Microsoft's newly launched language, known as the first facing language in the C / C ". Many people think it should be like C or C , but in fact it is more like a clone, so as to get started, read the "Java language and object-oriented programming" published by Tsinghua University Press "may help you. . This article assumes that you have all the knowledge you need to learn this language, there is no tight, I will listen to the relevant link in the article, given the characteristics of the Internet, if a link is not available, please go to Google query. As mentioned earlier, I am a Leo man, once I think that Java will make me look different, but I gave up this choice for a few months, I saw the two language about these two languages. Discussion, eventually choosing C #, please don't ask me why I make such choices, many people think Chinese is the most beautiful language in the world, but who is speaking Chinese outside the Chinese world? In addition, I found that people who study Java on the forum have very personal, when someone asked what language to learn is better, he will play hundreds of "java", fill the entire screen, nor is it for what. I think this is not exempting too much too much. If you say this is paranoid, I don't object, although I am a Leo, I don't want to be seen like this. At C # just launched, most of the programmers don't want to scratem with two sentences --...... Bless: This is a technical article that explains C #. There is also a slight grasping size, usually in the back.
, Huh, who, who takes me with banana skin, stand up! !
---- It seems that such articles are easy to understand, but these nonsense is indeed uncomfortable. ---- The reader originally wanted to learn what they needed from a lot of articles, but they were confused by so many interference information, and the time to go to Roening is much greater than the time required to understand the desired content. Sorrow!
