Ninety old lady arrested
Ding Lin
http://www.dscn.org/00002/00002235.htm
A few days ago, I wrote a "Ninety Old Nai's Long March". Written is a ninety-year-old lady called Tao Lis Han Dao, in order to call on "reform the campaign fund", just five thousand kilometers from the United States, across the United States. Finally, I was written, in the capital Washington, a federal judge met him in his judge. How did she ask the judge room? This is another story: Taoles old lady in the Federal Capitol, let the police gave it!
It is said that the old lady has completed the "Long March" in one step in one step, and the last stop is going straight to the US Federal Capitol. Her "reform campaign" calls for the call of Congress is not a Congress, there is final destination. It's hard for more than a year, it is for this day, Tao Lao Tau has already got the idea. In the round hall of the famous Federal Capitol, publish her political speech under the high dome, to promote her Reform political view.
So, is the US Congress Building? Let's say, if you play an example, the Capitol is in the tourist season, squeezing alive, full of tourists, full of tourists. No matter who, as long as you don't have a gun, it is absolutely no problem. Therefore, when the old man is smooth, it has entered the most lively central circular hall. The problem is in the next step. how?
After entering, they put out the propaganda, and the peach old sirl took out the manuscript, and he thought. This is a matter of law. The US law has a rule, that is: Capitol is legislative, there is a member of Legislative Council, as long as it is under this roof, it is not criminalized, it will not be arrested. He has legislative immunity. As long as you are not a Congress, you must not publish any political speech here, and you can't have any political demonstration. If you do it, it is a breaking method, and the police have the right to grasp you. This is a very strict rule.
Why is there such a "inequality" rule?
That is to protect the legislators, can speak smoothly, and smoothly say that the people represent the people represented by the partitions. You think about it, if a legislator is wrong, it is possible to be arrested, and he certainly impossible to express his own opinions without concerns about a legislation. Therefore, the first article is obviously necessary. However, why can't the people can't express their political views here?
This is also to make the expression of the legislators do not afford pressure. If the conference hall is close to the hall, the lobby is awarded, gathered with an angry heroic protest, or too enthusiastic supporters, or very sorrowful appeal, it is a speech, it is a slogan, and singing, will inevitably Generate a "square effect" to form an atmosphere of "the people who are in the conclusions". This atmosphere must be psychologically psychologically, which may force them to succumb to people's pressure and distort legislation. Legislation is the rules, must be just, long-term, take into account the long-term interests of all the people of the whole society, rather than anyone who is big. Therefore, legislation should be neutral, rational processes. This reason is inevitable to transform into an inertial process if the members of the members are surrounded by the actual surroundings of the people. This is not an alarmist. During the French Revolution, the Russian October Revolution took place to legislation, and the people rushed into the Parliament. What is even more, the people even have a gun threatening the legislator, and even drive a member with force. Going to this step, the so-called democracy is of course finished. It is to eliminate the above situation, and the democratic country has set up the rules above. There is no political expression of the people in the Capitol, whether you are, no matter what you express. I want to speaking, I want to express, I want to demonstrate, I have to go outside. When I arrived, anyone would you, anything, what do you expressed, how do you do it. Since this rule has this rule, it has to be strict. As a result, the peach and her supporters who don't listen to the police advised, they were arrested by the police in the Capitol. If the police don't catch it, they don't dare to open this precedent.
Everyone knows that the old man is not malicious, then say, or a ninety-year-old "Long March Record Creation". Everyone respects her. However, the rules are not bad. The characteristics of the law are there is no exception. Therefore, the old lady must also accept the arrest and on the court. The federal judge is in court, how is it to be judged, or it is necessary to follow the rules. I can't see the old lady who is the grandmother level, I broke the rules, because the rules have no one, people have to find a reason to break one, otherwise it is not unfair? The rules are broken, this law is not a law.
Old stretch, so, she will "plead", she is "pleading guilty", she is in the court statement, and she has expressed her own views on political reform, and gave "democracy". All the official judges, prosecutors, lawyers, reporters and lively, and gave a classic democratic lesson.
The judge is also very interesting, and she is "imprisoned for the time of imprisonment", how long, did not say, anyway, she is officially arrested, it is also a minute, "Time". She and her supporters immediately "released", each person judged the Ten US Tribunal.
This judgment, everyone feels impartial. Think about it, there is no more implied than this. After the judgment, after the rule was done, the judge respects the old Taisar to his office to express his respect for the old lady. It was at that time. The judge said that the passage of her, "Many of our laws in our United States are caused by ordinary people who have worked hard like this."
The reporter reported that when the judge said this sentence, he and the people around him, his eyes were flashing.
"Http://www.dvscn.net" Site (http://www.dvscn.net) is collected in 2002-08-20
