I saw the article on the soft test arrangement today. There is a paragraph in it, I feel very funny:
*********************************************************** ***********
"The range is wide, professional. The reform is divided into five major categories of computer application technology, software, network, information system and information services, a total of 20 vocational and technical qualification exams. In 2004, the first year of soft test reform will be opened. Software design and network management two series of three levels of three levels, specifically system analyst (senior engineer level); software designer, network engineer, database system engineer (engineer level); programmer, network administrator (assistant The engineer level). The program is simpler, and you can also be awarded in school. New soft test is greatly simplified for the application procedure, and the applicants no longer have restrictions on education and working hours. Candidates can directly apply for any door and level. Exam. I have to get a title certificate, break the old practice of the alignment, so that the power has returned! Especially worth mentioning, at school can also participate in any level of soft test! Get the title certificate through the exam means with others Experienced people stood on the same running line, and got rid of the "recent graduate = no practical work ability" such a embarrassing situation. "
*********************************************************** ************
After all, the soft test is still the exam. Chinese students are not afraid of exam. What is the exam? There are always those training courses that can be tested, and they can get it. This is a truth. Let's take a look at our current four or six exams, see those fish mixed training? What is even more, the teacher said directly in the training class. "Let's listen, let's take a test here!" . . Such training exists, the exam is no problem. But what is the ability? Chinese students are definitely a good hand in "back". The ability is definitely stayed in "back".
I hate the current evaluation of title, why? Indeed, existing title assessments are all from your work, do not consider your actual work ability. But use the exam to evaluate the title, especially this national public examination to assess the title, is it too late? Recent graduates = there is no practical work ability. I agree that the graduates with actual work ability will definitely take his learning time to get this work ability. This is sure, then he is definitely not a good student. Actual work ability is still going to get a drop in actual work! The first step in entering society is to learn this practical work ability. If you really have mentioned in this article, if you get the exam, you will have this situation if you have to have a year, graduates have taken the "Engineer" title certificate, and then the unit will take him as an engineer after paying the post. With direct access to the project, the final project completely failed. . . . . . It is definitely not a cruum, I think if this soft test is true, there will definitely have a training class, then there will be this situation!
Exam, can't take this way! Just like English four or six, now there is also a meaningfulness of the English four or six exams? It is only because there will be 6 million candidates every year, and there will be so many English test training institutions, and there will be so many "talents" who use it!
As the requirements of the title assessment, the software exam allows me to think of specially specially hot computer international certification, what mcse, mcdba, scjp, scjd, etc., it is extremely hot two years ago, but it is because the corresponding training center appears. I also found that China's MCSE was not known after the group strategy, and China's SJCP did not know what is object. (I also participated in this kind of training, I also have passed a 512, and there is a MCP certificate, but I have been shy to take it out because I know how this certificate is coming! Then I gave up this test. This kind of training. Because I realized that the Chinese is smart, only have a test will definitely have a variety of cheating methods, direct, conceald ...) to keep my words, the future of the soft test It is not far from this. Don't deceive students, especially students who are still studying, they need to learn to learn. Instead of this kind of call! ! ! ! The so-called fair is not this creation! The exam is not a test! Work ability is to accumulate!
