This thought, there are a lot of people like to be Wang Hao, see what is not pleasing, in order to show their own high, see who likes to cut a knife. It is not only to see from one aspect, and it is necessary to dialectically see it. Everything has a good side and bad side, everyone's opinions are their own, can't give yourself a view to others. As long as I am willing, I can easily say that Qinzi is good, Yue Fei is bad, not very difficult, and some people say, why do people like to know about it? Show yourself! Show yourself! ! Show yourself! ! ! In order to be famous, many people don't want to face, I have seen it, huh, huh, here, there are. What is the meaning of the debate? Is it to explain what is truth? Wrong, the debate is to vent. There are a lot of people in my heart, I don't like the quiet environment, I must have a little more happy. This is easy, you will find trouble, you will stand up, you will die, you will die. How to returnit? It is also very easy, finding Jingcha uncle, or learning pigs, it can be. I have been thinking about what the results have occurred in each debate? Will one party meet the other party? I haven't seen the results of the results yet? But why still does someone like? People's heart. Everyone has a selfishness, and the private expansion will appear uncommon. What is wrong? That is to say. Can you say it wrong? Yes, as long as you have the right, there is a right to have everything. Is there mingzhu in the world? This is a debate, I will not tell you. Because each party can write N of N's N ......... The post of K's post to indicate your own point of view. This is what the literati is doing, they are bored. The literati is not responsible for the progress of history (some absolute, there may be a big debate, huh, huh). In mathematics, absolute fairness is not existent. Establishing on a fair basis (there is a problem with a problem) people Zhu is not existing, so there is only the right. Some of them are far away, pull back. Is it meaningful? Why is anyone likes to argue? Why? Why? ? Why? ? ? To break the style, chase a person who is familiar with? Forcing others coming out and arguing with him? Psychological problems literati, no corresponding level, criticize criticism is the easiest to let one people need more than double more than him to criticize one person, you can write a post, you can have anything, there is a vulnerability (this I dare to guarantee that I will omit the procedure, may wish to be a axiom), causing the disadvantage, Everyone Can do IT. Does the chat room need OP? Some people say no need. Does BBS need to argue? I don't need it. If you do your own things, you don't want to run the monkey. The post has been left back. The moderator can handle itself.
