Questioning "National Excellent Doctoral Paper" One Selected Works July 02, 2004 03:27:35 Reporter Li Liping
The main content of the paper sent two international authority academic publications, both were returned twice, and the relevant experts were consistently given a negative evaluation. American Chinese, internationally renowned scholar Qian Shi --- News Beijing July 1st "In view of the fact that this paper is consistent with experts related to experts, the content is far from the authoritative magazine, so please education The department reconsides the results of the selection. "This is the objection to the" 2004 National Excellent Doctoral Papers "in the 2004 National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation. Falling review: "Not only lack theoretical value, but there is no practical meaning" "The main content of the paper has sent two" Signal Processing Journal "(Transactions), two times. Both returned without retaining. "Qian Shi said. Mr. Qian's objection to the Ministry of Education has already issued more than a month, but it has not received echo. On June 29th, after the Beijing University speech, Qian Shizhen met the reporter of this newspaper and stated that his opinion on this paper and the doubts of the "National Excellent Doctoral Papers". The selection of "National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation" begins in 1999, an important part of the Ministry of Education "Revitalization Action Plan for 21st Century Education] The purpose is to strengthen the training of high-level creative talents, encourage innovation spirit, improve the special education of Chinese graduate education. It is the quality of doctoral education. Because each selected excellent papers do not exceed 100 articles, it is called "National 100 Excellent Dr. Paper". The US Electronics Engineer Association is the most authoritative, most influential academic organization in the international electronic and electrical engineering field. The publication is also the core, most important, most important, most level of academic publications in the field of electronic and electrical engineering, and has a good reputation in the world. The domestic school community is also very valued for IEEE. If you can publish an article on its publications, it is a very high honor, in a variety of respect, and the assessment will account for very weight. Xi'an Jiaotong University Telecom Academy of Telecom, confirmed to reporters that Mr. Qian Shizhen enjoys a high visibility in the field of signal processing. Currently, the general engineer of the US national instrument company is currently a total of 15 signal processing in the United States, Europe and Japan. His work is considered a graduate textbook by some American universities. Even in this paper is criticized, some research results are also included. Therefore, the IEEE "Signal Management Journal" asked him to serve as the review expert. Mr. Qian Shizhen told reporters that the main content of this paper has been sent to IEEE "Journal of Signal Processing" last year. The journal editors have been reviewed by authoritative experts in this professional field. The result of three experts agreed that this article is from theory. It is wrong to say it. Editing is then returned without reserving. At the beginning of this year, the author was revised again to the IEEE "Signal Management Journal". Edited this time, the other two experts were reviewed, and Qian Shi was one of them. Qian Shi said that after he read, "I feel that the quality is very poor. In theory, it is basically wrong, and there is no application value", I think it should not be published, another review expert is the same as his opinion. As a result, the editor once again retained this manuscript. Mr. Qian introduced that there are several international top academic publications like IEEE. For contributions, there are several ways to handle: completely accept, make a relatively small modification and accept, do a relatively large modification, then accept, the last is not retained , That is, it is completely unacceptable. He said: "If the two contributions are returned by no retains, then this article is really not high." In this regard, another selection of "2004 excellent doctoral thesis" also said that international The academic publication is very strict and cautious about the review of the paper. If there is a "no reservation return" process, it is definitely the quality of this paper. On the original fax of the Ministry of Education, the reporter saw the IEEE "Signal Processing Journal" Decisive comments, "the author's work not only lack theoretical value, but there is no practical meaning.
All data simulations are almost all artificial patchwork. "" Excellent papers "The papers of the selection competition" can't get a doctoral degree in American university! "Qian Shi said. A professor of Xi'an Jiaotong University also involved signal processing, and also saw the relevant content of this paper. His evaluation is;" This doctoral degree has not innovated, even in China, Requirements to doctoral dissertations. "Mr. Qian Shi does not understand is that the papers do not reach the doctoral degree requirements can be elected national excellence? Because the" National Excellent Doctoral Papers Selection Measures ", the selection criteria of the national excellent doctoral thesis is:" Selection For the forefront of this discipline, there is an important theoretical significance or practical significance; innovation in theory or method, achieve breakthrough results, reach the advanced level of international similar academic students, with good social benefits or application prospects; materials are informative, reasonable, strict, text Accurate expression. According to another "2004 excellent doctoral thesis", participate in hundreds of selection people, generally declared in August after the doctoral graduation, the materials submitted are: dissertation, during the doctor's period and Ph.D. I graduated from the articles related to doctoral thesis, published the paper by the proof of SCI or EI, as well as some award certificates. The selection process is to make a communication review by seven peer experts, and then there is another group of experts sitting Discussion. Peking University, an educator who is unwilling to disclose the name, from the selection procedures and selection criteria, "National 100 Excellent Doctoral Paper" is very strict, fair, but the problem is that the doctor's research direction Very professional, even the experts in the same professional field may not be proficient, let alone, to read a doctoral paper, at least a week, and now experts are busy, sometimes look at the abstracts of the paper, reference And the professor of Xi'an Jiaotong University, also pointed out some problems with "100 selection". He said that an important indicator of the selection is that the relevant paper is included in SCI and EI. But now many publications in China Not very strict, and some publications retrieved by SCI and Ei are comprehensive magazines, and the professional level is not high. The educationist of Peking University is engaged in graduate education, and he analyzed the "national excellent" Reasons for inferior paper in doctoral thesis: now, "Excellent doctoral thesis" not only brings great honors and benefits to the winners and their units --- Selected by the Ministry of Education 500,000 to 800,000 yuan Fund, and have become an important indicator of doctoral education in colleges and universities. All colleges and universities have attached great importance to this, and the school-speed competition is very fierce. In order to be selected, they do all kinds of work, of which It is inevitable that there will be unfair competition and even black boxes. "Hundreds of selection" is not an academic competition, but the competition of the name, interest, which leads to the "National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation". Selection is getting more and more This scholar believes that the "100 selection" selection system itself has drawbacks, the academic achievements are not at the forefront of the international, originality, require a long inspection process. Doctoral thesis is carried out again Evaluation is unscientific. In addition, even if you want to engage in this selection, it should not be hosted by the government. The award-based role of the government hosted is too strong, and it is easy to cause malformed competition. Mr. Qian Shi said that he is the Ministry of Education It is possible to disclose an objection and disclose it to the media. It is hoped that China's technology and education can be more better. He worked in the United States for 15 years, and many of the universities of China, the research institutes, I feel that the domestic research level and international gap are still Big, "This is not the problem of money, but the problem of people." Mr. Qian believes that domestic students are first-class, but the teachers are three-flow.
