Wen: Huang Wei
Pig: It's a little lazy: hard work, resentment
Still starting with an example: Company Background: A professional software development company company, company type: project type
There is a problem 1. Project management and confusion, project group exchange communication is serious. Severe to project managers don't know what project members do. The department manager does not know what the project team is doing. 2. Customer feedback cannot be solved in time, today promised I will forget tomorrow 3. After the task is issued, the execution efficiency is too low. The extension is serious. 4. The workload of each project is different. The workload of the project team is unsatisfactory, and the reasonable resource coordination between the group is unable. Saying that I am very busy, in fact, some people are really busy, and some people have to die.
So I have to kill some "pigs" for these situations, and a small project management system in the department has developed a small project management system in the department management, task management, and performance assessment.
The system flow chart is as follows:
In fact, it is not a small tool that is too complex, but it has received effectiveness. 1. Quantify the work of project group members, and hooks with performance. 2. Project manager can make more reasonable and effective with this tool Performing project tracking and control 3. Department managers can use this system to make reasonable group resource coordination of the most important part of this set of tools in the task tracking and control, performance is just one of the controls. Several After the month, I solved most of the previous problems. When I work, I will go to my own task before working, and then one of them will arrange itself.
To start killing cattle ...
A few months later, our director saw this system, at the time, the case should be promoted in the company. But some of the developments have not yet.
1. To follow the company's operation, based on this system, the company specializes in the project team for revision, and integrating CMM3, during project development, the author of the consultant has repeatedly proposed multiple times. You cannot pin up the company's reforms in this tool. The tool is just a tool. It is necessary to establish a series of management systems and their supporting, which will reduce the possible factors that can be generated throughout the system to the lowest, but no one responds.
2. In a few, our chairman suddenly wonders, and half of the salary and performance appraisal is not very scientific. It can only be used as a reference, because performance score is made by various project managers. Evaluation, although some standards have been developed, but it is not perfect, or the subjective accounts for a large part.
There is a policy, there is a countermeasure. The management methods of various departments are different. There are many things that have been crying after the system is officially run. 1. Project members will give themselves, the rated workers and standards are very high. 2 The task repeats, there are several cases: malignant repetition, because the quality problem task is reworked, it has become a new task. 3. The task is split too thick and cannot be effectively controlled. Everyone is going to fight, not for the project. So the project manager is good, and the number of people who have diligently add points is high. The people who are old and the people doing things are low. The entire system completely lost the original intention of the design, and the company's restricted employee, the project member relationship was tense.
The same thing is successful in the small range of sectors, but the company is failed. Kill the pig's knife killed the cattle! !
It's like the original bullet, used to generate electricity is a good thing, it is not good!
