I have a slightly known Chinese people's Chinese people's national development tracks. I know that the key to revitalizing the Chinese nation is science and technology. It is intellectual property, it is independent innovation, but is this easy? On Monday (June 12, 2006), there was a report on the "Beijing Morning News" report on "Sealing", the original text is WAPI is my country's wireless local area network security technology standard, which reflects my country's standard The intention of strategic and information security strategy, once triggered the "Gong Dynasty" of Sino-US intellectual property rights. At the beginning of the birth, WAPI was blocked by the US Electrical and Electronic Engineer Society (IEEE), which is not moral and unscrupulous means. Now, as a security subscription proposal for the current wireless local area network technology, WAPI and American standards launched fierce competition. ISO / IEC (International Standardization Organization / International Electrical Commission) represented by Western interests (International Standardization Organization / International Electrotechnics) For many years, some people also fantasizely proposed the development strategy of "market exchange technology". Please take a look at this report. Foreigners have blocked the opportunity to participate in international standards for their own interests. We give The foreigner market, the foreigners will give us related technologies in terms of benevolence? Please also have "the" "This is a technical violence (profiteering) era", "this is an era of exploitation in value chain" ("value chain exploited" I Write a single list of blogs in "Love, Wisdom"). "Technical violence" is the means to achieve the purpose of implementing purposes in civilized society, because "technical violence" can bring "technological profits"; "technical violence" is more crowning with intellectual property as an excuse This has nothing to do with the exudation of Westerners for more than 100 years ago to seek equality and trade. Anyway, in violation of my power is excuse, you hurt my interests, of course is yours. wrong! Why don't you open our port to Westerners free equality? Why do you destroy Westerners' intellectual property? Let the world heard the word, and more than a hundred years ago, the Westerners emphasize the power of the power and the power name stressed today, but the purpose of Westerners did not change - value chain exploitation! Wipe the eyes to see the Westerners: When we don't have intellectual property rights, they hide high-intentional property protection, but we have the technical standards of their own intellectual property (WAPI), well, Westerners do not take us Is it not evil? Do you give us a technology after you give us a good guy? This is not a kind person to open the family looking forward to letting thieves think about the stupid idea! Those who are still flickering "technology", please empty the water in your mind! Said that I heard the "market change technology" is the "Tianfang Night Tan" of the modern Oriental Edition, and it is difficult to listen to the people of the Wang Pupmer! There is also a little reminders that "market change technology", Westerners play two means in addition to the intellectual property maintenance and standard development, and there is a "art organize" under the Western Interest Group, almost, so I can improve my country's military technology. The relevant technologies of strength are all exported to China. These three tricks are like the "Sword of Dhalis" hanging on the top of our head. It is also the three tricks that are restricted by the West.
Please understand my opinion, the above sentence is true, quote Dr. Miye, to be "negotiable, and the words"! Can't talk in the society, I am not responsible as "vest" online! I was an interview with the first visit to the Linux core guardian Andrew Morton, and Mr. Andrew Morton didn't know what to meet in my head! My first question is: There is no racial discrimination in the international open source community. To tell the truth, I have questions about my opinion. I don't have a mature consideration. I will mention the angle and way of the question, this question is by Andrew Morton Mr. I heard frowned, Andrew Morton was very strange my problem, I think my problem is somewhat incredible, but I still have a detriment to answer me, and I also want to understand my doubts, I will be The "Discussion Open Source" is described in theoretical elaboration. Mr. Andrew Morton said: "Open source community is open, developers from all over the world, do not know what the other side is long, but no matter what the cultural background is in the open source community to pay attention to language polite, Use the word rough, is not accepted by other developers, yes! How can a person who does not respect others in the open source community can be able to develop together with everyone? We usually hide far away from people in life or people who are not polite in their lives! I still asked a similar problem for the nation. Please see that the officials here should not "throw the bricks" because I am also patriotic! My second question is: It is well known that China has different ideologies with Western countries, but in the Linux open source community, this background impact does not affect the development of Chinese people to join Linux kernel technology? My second question was answered by Mr. Tom Hanrahan with Mr. Andrew Morton, and Mr. Tom Hanrahan said that OSDL is not a political organization, and OSDL is in a non-profit organization (NPO) in Linux central status to promote The development of Linux promotes enterprise-level applications, and the purpose of Mr. Andrew Morton is to describe the latest trend of Linux kernel development and the direction of recent core development. Calls for more development volunteers from China to walk into Linux community development.
Then I asked the third question: In the face of many Linux communities (now the world's Linux version is nearly 400, the open source project is more than 120,000), should China's open source enthusiasts should join which Linux community? Mr. Andrew Morton directly replied: "Look at the purpose of open source enthusiasts, every Linux community has its own differences, open source enthusiasts can learn more, add different communities according to their own specialty and preferences."
Another reporter interviewed at the same time asked the fourth question: How should the Chinese join the international open source community? I regret that I was busy taking pictures without remembering the answer, I couldn't afford to look at the official.
He then asked the fifth question: What role should the Chinese government play in China's open source community? Mr. Andrew Morton replied: User benefits is the most fundamental, the government's practice is not necessarily effective, but the government can do more work in intellectual property, in patent protection, so that the international view is a good government image. Mr. Tom Hanrahan added that China has already opened Linux courses. This is very good. The government can do more work in open source education. From the student era, the establishment of young people is interested in open source is a long history!
