Doing a "computer application basis" to add up for nearly two weeks. Columns the catalog and tried to write a multi-content (more than 30 pages). Today, Wang Ding said that it is temporarily stopped, ready to do other books. Now, write the middle idea to exchange.
Because I haven't received your reply, I just try to write some content first with my own idea. I have brought a few "Computer Application Basics" classes in several times. I feel that there is such a problem in the textbook: I don't understand the students. Even if the test is examined, the student assaults reading, nor does it know what it is talking. The textbook is difficult to distinguish between operability content and theoretical content, and theoretical content is misconduct. Second, you can't do it. When I was internship, I was very awkward. I don't know what to do with the computer. So play card games, use the notepad training to type the wind. Some subtots are strong, and I don't know what to do. Some section operability is more, and the internship is too much digestion. Third, it is not used. Teaching materials and teachers have too few, computer "master" is unsatisfactory, and I don't know how to learn. For example, Word has finished learning all the contents, and can't do a class.
So when I was writing, I tried the following aspects: 1. The theoretical knowledge is simple and practical. I can read it when I see my book, know what this section is talking about, what to learn. Second, practice into the body. Put the content of the operation section, clearly divide the text, try to achieve the book. The "uploaded operation" is added to the content, putting a variety of operational methods and application skills into it to practice tape. (Practice as much as the guide, such as talking about the drawing program, must give a few creative good and flexible graphics). Third, advanced and improved. In order to put advanced, the content of the study is placed in the "advanced improvement" part behind each section. On the one hand, it is a complete knowledge system, and on the other hand, the learning method also has a guiding role.
In addition, in the organization of the content, there is no order such as a common summary, file, accessory, and control panel. Because, I think Windows is mainly an operational platform, focusing on understanding and understanding of this platform. Accessories and control panels cannot be taught (and their various tools are not known for the accessories and control panels). I want to explain step by step according to the process of usually touching the computer. The first is to understand the concept of the operating system and Windows (3.1 Operating System Overview); then boot to see the desktop; take a look at the point at the point; students self-study "roaming WinodWSXP" and "Help and Support Center"; (3.2 Windows XP's basic understanding of understanding and understands the window; understanding the file concept; new and replication. (3.3 Windows Basic Operation) Next is the start of running procedures, the first program tells notepad; this is entered in Chinese; (3.4 English input and five pen words), it is a drawing, media player, installer, and commonly used Tool software, Windows Advanced Management This piece of knowledge.
The above is my idea of this book, coming out, hoping to criticize.
