Zi Yan: "Can you learn, you can not be able to have; you can have a way, you can not stand; you can stand, not right."
After reading the remember of Teacher Li, he knew that "the right to trade" is an important issue of Kong Xue. His explanation is the difference between principles and flexibility, and it feels more appropriate, and it is also very conforming to the culture of the Chinese. As the selected note: "Right, the saints are used. Failure to say, the Sky has not been able to do it, it will be unfast." That is, flexible is the best realm. But not a general person can reach, don't want to run.
The right is always a very subtle topic. On the one hand, it seems that you can use the right to resolve all principles (standing), on the other hand, this work is not anyone, just like the previous note, you have to "saints" Talent, but still "big", which is to get the spatial line. And who is not who says that he is just. So, when is the right to rights. It looks extraordinary and mysterious. In the end, it became an excuse for political rulers or moral rulers to deliver unlimited corruption under their unlimited power. That is: the people violated the truth are mistakes, and the violation of the big person is flexible.
Of course, on the other hand, although it is not that everyone can go as good, it is actually so universal. (This is also just that the principle itself is also "right"). The so-called "there is a policy", "said the difference between learning, and the difference between saying. Originally, the power of "right" is used in silently, and this in turn will force the policy's formula to pull the policy (Jing), hope to pass "teaching" matte between the two The gap, on the other hand, to exercise the policy through "right", making the gap between the two more. Two-phase role, eventually forming a set of sets around me, there is a lot of truth but can't fully act in accordance with the truth.
Corresponding "right" words can also be seen in the role in our language. "Weighing" is a relatively neutral word, but this word is basically the judgment of a person in a single thing, and there is no way to accumulate improvement, and there is no way to ensure "procedural justice". The right to "power", "power", probably refers to the state of "saints", has completely overwhelmed the principle (after), almost for what you want. And the right to "power", "power", "power", basically, is completely opposite, and generally as a derogatory, people who use these methods generally do not consider what principles, just use Every means get that "right", which is the status of "saints" can be a violation of the principle. And please note that there is no "talent human rights" in our language, and the right to "saints" can be operated by "saints". If there is any weight, it is also a "saints".
Then I have this "right", just say that Kongberries have understood the concept of the time to make an understanding? In my opinion, it is not so mysterious, it is necessary to make it on flexible, cultivate to "saints". In fact, chasing the source, "right" refers to the weight, then "right" is quantitative meaning. Why doesn't it mean that it doesn't mean an authority, that is to say that the qualitative judgment is still not a true mastery, only understands quantitative analysis, knowing the critical state is the boundary of the principle, is true, the principle, so the so-called The right, that is, the precise definition "" "is to know what kind of principle, when not, there are several principles to choose which one. (Combined with two sentences, "if there is only a hoe in your hand, then the world looks all the nails." If you can't think of three mistakes, you don't really understand it yet. it"). Thus, the so-called right, not the context of "Jing", which is not considered in the general sense of the above, is exactly the opposite, is the precision of principles, and the principle that is really useful. It is a pity that our culture is very lacking this quantitative tradition and ability. As Huang Renyu said, China's modern revolution and development is to achieve the society that "can manage" on number words ", and this shift is not just a technical problem. Basic point, China's so-called "Jing" itself lacks a strict definition, it is difficult to further quantify. Basically stayed in experience (a large number of accumulated phenomena), principles (according to a strategy obtained), inference (further development under the conditions established in principle, may be inspected, may also be inspected). However, there is no principle (the description of the facts in the case of conditions). That is, only "hook 3 shares 4 strings 5" and there is no "two straight horns squares and equal to the slanting square". This is also what I can't agree with Mr. Li's judgment of Confucius learned "practical rationalism". There is no "reason", what is "rationality", and "rationalism".
