Nowadays, books can already be said that it is difficult to imagine how to spread it when they don't use books.
But now, although there are more books, it is good.
This time, I wanted to buy some books, I went to the bookstore for a few days, but I did not worth buy.
I mean is not because my level is high enough to see the level of the book, but in my opinion, it is not classic.
I don't like famous, because I said it. But where is it? I have a break in the intermittent, I have a lot of books, and I have seen at least ten more than one hundred of the rabbit, but what are those? More, it is a discussion on life society. I have always thought that those things, in a period, there are ten eight people in a period. Society is a smooth development of a semi-jumping mode, which can be said that it is not transferred. Many times, there are some things that can indeed affect the development of the social era, but it is definitely not those famous.
I have always believed that the master is adapted to the development of the times, not because of the history of the era. In other words, it is a time to be famous in the times, and there is a related thing, not because the famous is coming, it will affect the development of the era.
China has always believed in Marxism, and social development is also done according to what he said. But I am thinking at the same time is: Is it really because Marxism guided the development direction of capitalism? If there is no Marx, do you have Niu Xi, Kejan to write some things?
In the early 18th century to the medium, capitalism's development is indeed very fast, but is it really a kind of theory? The actual situation is that the workers have some awareness, but there is no better than Marx. So a lot of workers' exercises will fail. Now research also shows that Marx does not adapt to the current development of the current situation. For example, the old Soviet model, or now Chinese model, really use Marxist guidance is North Korea, now how everyone can see it. If you are welcome, it is a pure national terrorism.
In many times, a thing is in accordance with the development of the times, it will be famous, otherwise it will be forgotten.
Now, Chinese classical four famous, in fact, most of them are not as good as everyone thinks. Nowadays, a lot of writing is actually better than them. Regardless of the four famous families such as character construction, language structure, writing, etc..
Of course, it is undeniable that at the time, the four masterpieces may be the best. For example, the red land dream, although I have never been very precautions, but I admit that in many ways, I can represent the highest level of the old novel. As is the use of poetry, the character environment is characterized, there are also some attention to people that are more developed by the times, which are best at the time. Now there is a lot of theoretical things development, like some pure feelings, and the subtle description of some things, the complex diversification of writing, these are ancient things that cannot be combined.
In fact, what is the best? I think it is martial arts and romance, because they are really giving "people".
The ancient cultural development is not very good, you can literate some elite characters. Like the West, literacy is not a nobles are priests, corresponding to it, developing the Bible research and the ideal philosophical system, literary forms are mostly the knights, right, there is a fourteen poems, the drama is also Greek mythology and heroic legend, king story, etc. Chinese people inherit a kind of utilitarian thoughts, and the reading is good. That is, all literature is done for this goal. I have always considered a different number in China. Maybe Chinese people prefer some things that regulate template, or some small skills are smart, "scrutin" becomes a classic, maybe it is hard to imagine, foreign literature is the whole It is difficult to understand why China's poetry rhyme is so strict. In ancient Chinese culture, the object of culture is not most "mass main body", but a little "cultural elite", so the form of literature is more in high, deep, and elegant. But it is also normal, writing shallow things will make you joke.
Opera, more fleeing this restriction. Tang Poetry Song Word Yuanqu, only the art form of the Yuan Dynasty is not literary, because there is no knowledge of the literati, the literati status is extremely low, so more in-depth layers, the art has more "custom" cultural characteristics. Demonstration and vulgarization like the Yuanqu, the literati in other eras is disdainful.
Modern society, the threshold of culture is almost no, at least 80% of people know, but truly cultural cultivation, it does not account for 1% of the body. This is why there are many reasons why the cultural forms are not falling, such as poetry, such as pure literature.
Commercial society, stronger profits to maximize, in other words, the more booking, the better. However, don't forget, now more people don't have more ideological "literacy" people, now write a deep thing, people may only have few very little parts, in circulation, these are It is very difficult.
So now the mainstream of literature should be those who are suitable for most people. For example, romance novels, martial arts novels, some gossip journals, sports, games, etc.
Now a more bad phenomenon is: You can go out with money. There are more books, but more than 99% are garbage. It is also very garbage in liberal arts. I want to see some social history, but I can't see it in a few pages. I am very suspicious, do he know what he wrote.
Writing a book, what is a doctor, a master, a professor, but is it true? How many of them are familiar with their own fields, more is that Niang Lang is a big. Think of a joke, at a seminar of Sichuan University, there are foreign experts to participate, but he is amazed, almost all people's views are the same, and they still refute a different person with different opinions. Why? It is very simple, it is a teacher taught. And this discipline is also this school.
Nowadays, many academia are like this. For their own interests, more is the party hidden, resolutely destroyed different opinions, and written books are also a lot of views.
I like to see some history, but there is less, because the scholars are studying, not Bo. Like someone asking a lot of a poem, but not knowing. Tell him that this poem is written by Li Ba, and the result is that he only studies the poem of Li Bai, and I don't know the early stage. This is now the scholar.
I miss some masters of Chinese studies, such as bear 15, etc., their books are a book, there is absolutely no too much garbage.
I don't really like Zong Baihua. His aesthetic has become a thousand gold oil, painted everywhere, and scratches everywhere, but I am afraid that Zong Baihua is more than one hundred times more than knowing the bear. When many, the knowledge is not necessarily proportional to the name. Now it is said that the direction of literature is developing. I think this is right. The classic is adapted to the times. In a time that is not easy to have a classic era, you may wish to make a uncleary thing.
Now the book can be said to be a layer of bubbles, you can see it, the study doesn't have to be, in fact, all the books are the same, you can say it well, what he wrote.
About 3K, just these.
