B15378C
Author: TOM Technology 2003-10-30 13:38:54 blog China (Blogchina.com)
Rob coverle
Rob Enderle is a famous American IT industry analyst, which was one of the "TECHNOLOGY MARKETING" magazines as "TECHNOLOGY MARKETING" magazine. Currently, Rob Enderle is committed to research company companies IT. Specific issues, such as "The development of the computer for employees" Communication between the Linux population. As the Linux group always looks like the Microsoft's broken side, I also tend to look at the Linux group from the one hand. Typically, we have views of a person or company from a particular understanding. For example, when the reader browsing the SlashDot website, even the most ordinary readers will also say that the above discussion is not based on people's personal understanding but based on their information from others. And these understandings may even have turned once or twice. In my impression, most people who make criticized opinions on my columns do not see the work of the evaluation. However, it is like a lot of understanding of the people who are infected by a bunch of people, my understanding and some of our media workers are similarly contaminated, and it is probably contaminated by people in the same group. of. So I think maybe it is necessary to share my understanding of Linux support from a few Linux supporters in the past few months. Perhaps reading this version, many of you will find that your formation of apples, Linux or even Microsoft is so similar. When considering writing this article, I found that there are three main three categories of open resource software: professional workers, pastors and fanators. To a large extent, my formation of open software view is a fanatic activity. When you are reading this article, please put yourself in the face of the analyst or reporter of the same person, ask yourself which group is the biggest impact on your belief. Linux professional workers professional workers are platform unknown. They just want to complete their jobs, and they write to me but just try to prove that they don't have a good job in work, I don't want me to get commented here to support a certain argument. Professional workers usually look at the same SCO litigation like other other people, and keep themselves from any related events as much as possible. They can't talk about Linux or Windows, just want to find the right tool to complete the work. Unlike choices or admire a platform, these professional workers are more inclined to tell me that I should conduct more criticisms for both platforms. In addition, they use more time to discuss two platform advantages. These professional workers have maintained precociless, but they are stubborn, but they will never have religious enthusiasm. In other words, these people are a person I am happy or willing to work for my work. These people will spend a lot of time to help me understand the questions they face every day, and let me see what is important to them. If they really show a preference for a platform, it will usually be BSD, because in comparison, it is more concentrated, and there are also the advantages of many UNIX and open resource software. In addition, in order to become Linux or BSD experts, these professional workers often call themselves for Windows experts and universally live in a mixed environment is not because of a wide range of launches, but because this environment is generated in this way and runs. Good, because they don't give priority to some things that have not been destroyed. Linux priests are all good people, but no matter what is wrong, the only answer is open resource software and Linux. Instead, it is better to discuss problems with Linux pastor to discuss the unilateral speech. Pastors can write out numerous dogmas in a backup, and to a one-on-line information link. However, they are too believed in the facts. Even if they see the facts, they are also filtered through their own belief. Therefore, even for evidence of argument with the argument, they will also claim that this may only support their own point of view.
