Recently, the company has adjusted a large-scale departmental personnel, and the company entered a "very period".
The company is a software company with 150 people in the establishment, mainly engaged in system integration, hardware agents, software, etc., the current largest changes are three software business departments. There are three parallel software business units, respectively. It is the management software business department, the operation software division, the technology development center, and the business scope of the three sectors is more clear, but later with the integration of the application system, the boundaries are increasingly not obvious, forming a software range The three feet of the three feet. Maybe "Three During" is not very accurate, but this term can reflect the interior of the company, the existence of the three software division departments. I summarized the three software division issues as follows:
1. Each department is the business department, with the ultimate goal of earnings, maybe the "business department" can stimulate the potential of the department in a period of time, promote software profit, but time, the short-term exposure is obvious, you can say no means For the sake of profit, it can be done in the first half of the year, no matter whether the software design, basic technology, software products in this environment will be done. The software will never go foremost. . .
2, each department's own interests are always in the first place, the interests are damaged, which will lead to bleak the departments, it is possible to make the entire department unpleasant due to the short sectoral performance, so the power between the department and the department It's more serious, the department should go in front, just do it very well, definitely there is a worst one, the competition is nowhere, competition is a good thing, but competition can also lead to contradiction between the department. It causes knowledge closure between the department. A company with civil war will definitely not be a good company. . .
3, the organizational structure of the three parallel business, leads to between the project team and the project group, between programmers and programmers, is not good to communicate, it is not willing to exchange, this structure, This kind of power is caused to unannance, technology cannot be shared. The three departments are equivalent to one department in some sense, or not as a department. . .
4, the three software departments are made in a head, and who is the company's product positioning, the company's platform is developing, the company's software design level, the technical content is in one, sometimes a person played The role may be more important than a few dozen people, and this person has not appeared in front of us. . .
5. The most people feel that the company is in software reuse, software accumulation, it is not compliment, it has been three years, it can be said that the company is "nothing" in this area, saying is a bit exaggerated, doing software design Consider how to make a relatively universal combo, it is difficult to accumulate some experience in the design and development, some types of libraries, some procedures rapidly develop frameworks, today develop personnel wages, and develop personnel companies tomorrow, or this department develops personnel Salary, another department is also developing personnel salary, I have a deep understanding, we are doing things with your hands, and a good software company is doing things with your mind, and then we can shout loud: Our company is people, What are you afraid of. . .
The above is the shortcomings that I have summarized the shortcomings involved in the software department. Recently, the company has made great changes. For individuals, the changes are beneficial to certain people, and they may involve certain people's interests, and for the company The development of the software industry, we seem to see hope. . .
I remember that in the "dialog" program of TV, I heard the president of Yaxov said a word. How to understand the sentence, I don't say that the company will face difficulties, but more firm to confidence in this change, failure, success, but the final goal, there is only one, that is, the leading the other side. The company really entered a "very period", the company is about to succeed? Or, the company is about to fail?
